Enhancing Computational Thinking and Learning Engagement through STEM-based Water Turbine Project

Authors

  • Diana Maulidia Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Nanang Winarno
  • Lilik Hasanah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Mutiara Syifa Illinois State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v14i2.16029

Keywords:

computational thinking , learning engagement, STEM, water turbine project

Abstract

In today’s digital era, students face challenges in developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills essential for success in an increasingly complex world. Computational Thinking (CT) has emerged as a pivotal 21st-century skill for innovation and problem-solving. This study investigates the impact of STEM-based learning through a water turbine project on students’ CT and Learning Engagement (LE) at the secondary school level. A quasi-experimental approach with a pretest-posttest control group design was employed. The participants were 76 of 445 8th-grade students from secondary schools in Bandung, Indonesia, divided equally into experimental and control groups, each comprising 38 students. Statistical analyses using the Mann-Whitney U test on n-gain scores revealed a significant improvement in CT for the experimental group compared to the control group (U = 50.00, sig.). < 0.001, and a large effect size (r = 0.80). Similarly, LE in the experimental group increased significantly compared to the control group (U = 10.50, sig.). < 0.001, and a large effect size (r = 0.85). These results highlight that STEM learning through the water turbine project effectively enhances students’ CT and LE. This study demonstrates the potential of STEM-based approaches to foster essential 21st-century skills among secondary school students. However, further research is needed to explore its application across diverse contexts and skill areas.

References

Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2022). Computational thinking integration into science classrooms: Example of digestive system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(1), 99-115.

Chongo, S., Osman, K., & Nayan, N. A. (2021). Impact of the Plugged-in and Unplugged Chemistry Computational Thinking Modules on Achievement in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4).

Çoban, E., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2021). An alternative approach for measuring computational thinking: Performance-based platform. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100929.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2021). Computational thinking for professionals. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 30-33.

Donham, C., Pohan, C., Menke, E., & Kranzfelder, P. (2022). Increasing student engagement through course attributes, community, and classroom technology: lessons from the pandemic. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(1), e00268-00221.

El-Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Martín-Barroso, E., Mondada, F., Zufferey, J. D., Bruno, B., & Román-González, M. (2025). The competent Computational Thinking test (cCTt): A valid, reliable and gender-fair test for longitudinal CT studies in grades 3–6. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-55.

Fadhilah, N., Risanti, D. D., Wahyuono, R. A., Sawitri, D., Mawarani, L. J., Muharja, M., Arimbawa, I. M., & Raafi’u, B. (2023). Energy Experiment Teaching Kit sebagai Alat Bantu Materi Pembelajaran Energi Terbarukan yang Interaktif dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sains Siswa SDN Ajung 01 Kalisat. Sewagati, 7(4), 634-642.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw Hill LLC. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=neCZzgEACAAJ

Gao, X., & Hew, K. F. (2022). Toward a 5E-based flipped classroom model for teaching computational thinking in elementary school: Effects on student computational thinking and problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 512-543.

García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on student performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171-197.

Guerra-Mota, M., Minas, D., Xenos, M., & Sa, M. M. (2024). Development of a 3D virtual world tool for sustainable energy education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10586.

Gundersen, S. W., & Lampropoulos, G. (2025). Using Serious Games and Digital Games to Improve Students’ Computational Thinking and Programming Skills in K-12 Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Technologies, 13(3), 113.

Harangus, K., & Katai, Z. (2020). Computational thinking in secondary and higher education. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 615-622.

Hsu, T.-C., Chang, C., Wong, L.-H., & Aw, G. P. (2022). Learning performance of different genders’ computational thinking. Sustainability, 14(24), 16514.

Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2022). A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational researcher, 51(2), 146-151.

Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in human behavior, 72, 558-569.

Lee, H.-Y., Wu, T.-T., Lin, C.-J., Wang, W.-S., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024). Integrating computational thinking into scaffolding learning: An innovative approach to enhance science, technology, engineering, and mathematics hands-on learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2), 211-247.

Lei, H., Chiu, M. M., Li, F., Wang, X., & Geng, Y.-j. (2020). Computational thinking and academic achievement: A meta-analysis among students. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105439.

Li, Z., & Oon, P. T. (2024). The transfer effect of computational thinking (CT)-STEM: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 44.

Lin, X., Ma, Y., Ma, W., Liu, Y., & Tang, W. (2021). Using peer code review to improve computational thinking in a blended learning environment: A randomized control trial. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1825-1835.

Liu, S., Peng, C., & Srivastava, G. (2023). What influences computational thinking? A theoretical and empirical study based on the influence of learning engagement on computational thinking in higher education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1690-1704.

Lodi, M., & Martini, S. (2021). Computational thinking, between Papert and Wing. Science & education, 30(4), 883-908.

Manikutty, G., Sasidharan, S., & Rao, B. (2022). Driving innovation through project based learning: A pre-university STEAM for Social Good initiative. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE),

Markandan, N., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2022). Integrating computational thinking and empowering metacognitive awareness in STEM education. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 872593.

Martín-Núñez, J. L., Ar, A. Y., Fernández, R. P., Abbas, A., & Radovanović, D. (2023). Does intrinsic motivation mediate perceived artificial intelligence (AI) learning and computational thinking of students during the COVID-19 pandemic? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100128.

Pambudi, N. A., Nanda, I. R., Alfina, F. T., & Syahrial, A. Z. (2024). Renewable energy education and awareness among Indonesian students: Exploring challenges and opportunities for a sustainable future. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 63, 103631.

Paucar-Curasma, R., Cerna-Ruiz, L. P., Acra-Despradel, C., Villalba-Condori, K. O., Massa-Palacios, L. A., Olivera-Chura, A., & Esteban-Robladillo, I. (2023). Development of computational thinking through STEM activities for the promotion of gender equality. Sustainability, 15(16), 12335.

Peel, A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Using unplugged computational thinking to scaffold natural selection learning. The American Biology Teacher, 83(2), 112-117.

Peel, A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2022). Algorithmic explanations: An unplugged instructional approach to integrate science and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(4), 428-441.

Pujawan, I. G. N., & Suryawan, I. P. P. (2021). Effectiveness of STEM Approach on Mathematical Communication Ability. 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020),

Rahayu, S. (2022). Implementasi PBL terintegrasi STEM dengan flipped classroom untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir sistem siswa SMA pada topik usaha dan energi.

Ramachandran, A., Ellis, N., & Gladwin, D. (2024). Energy literacy: A review in education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 55(3), 191-202.

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary educational psychology, 36(4), 257-267.

Sari, U., Ulusoy, A., & Pektaş, H. M. (2025). Computational Thinking in Science Laboratories Based on the Flipped Classroom Model: Computational Thinking, Laboratory Entrepreneurial and Attitude. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-25.

Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2021). Improving 7th-graders’ computational thinking skills through unplugged programming activities: A study on the influence of multiple factors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100926.

Tadena, M. T. G., & Salic-Hairulla, M. A. (2021). Local-based lesson on hydrologic cycle with environmental education integration: Designing learners ideas through STEM. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,

Tariq, R., Aponte Babines, B. M., Ramirez, J., Alvarez-Icaza, I., & Naseer, F. (2025). Computational thinking in STEM education: current state-of-the-art and future research directions. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6, 1480404.

Vasconcelos, L., Arslan-Ari, I., Miller, B., & Gonzalez-Tapia, R. (2025). Robotics in early childhood STEM education (REC-STEMEd): The impact on preservice teachers’ attitudes and intentions toward computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 1-28.

Weber, A. M., & Greiff, S. (2023). ICT skills in the deployment of 21st century skills: A (cognitive) developmental perspective through early childhood. Applied Sciences, 13(7), 4615.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.

Xu, X., Shi, Z., Bos, N. A., & Wu, H. (2023). Student engagement and learning outcomes: an empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework. Medical education online, 28(1), 2268347.

Yin, Y., Khaleghi, S., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2022). Developing effective and accessible activities to improve and assess computational thinking and engineering learning. Educational technology research and development, 70(3), 951-988.

Yulianti, D., Sugianto, S., & Ngafidin, K. (2022). Scratch assisted physics learning with a STEM approach in the pandemic era to develop 21st century learning skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 185-194.

Zheng, L., Long, M., Niu, J., & Zhong, L. (2023). An automated group learning engagement analysis and feedback approach to promoting collaborative knowledge building, group performance, and socially shared regulation in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 101-133.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Maulidia, D., Winarno, N., Hasanah, L., & Syifa, M. (2025). Enhancing Computational Thinking and Learning Engagement through STEM-based Water Turbine Project. Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 14(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v14i2.16029

Issue

Section

Articles