Development of Interactive Multimedia on Acids and Bases Contextually (IMPAC) Incorporating Multiple Representations

Authors

  • Dwi Rizki Mutiarasani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Muhammad Anarda Wiguna Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Tafani Tafani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Suyanta Suyanta Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v14i2.15518

Keywords:

interactive learning, multimedia, acid-base, multiple representations, contextual learning, chemistry education

Abstract

The research for the development of the interactive multimedia IMPAC carries important implications for chemistry education, particularly in the topic of acid-base solutions. The contextual approach applied makes the material more relevant to students’ daily lives, thereby enhancing their motivation and engagement in learning. Research method 4D Development. Validation by media and content experts, as well as practicality tests by teachers and readability tests by students, respectively, resulted in ideal scores of 95%, 87%, 92%, and 94%. All scores were categorized as “Very Good,” reinforcing IMPAC's feasibility for broader implementation. Therefore, IMPAC has the potential to serve as an innovative and effective learning medium that not only strengthens conceptual understanding but also fosters a more engaging, interactive, and meaningful chemistry learning experience. The implication for research is to provide recommendations for teaching materials on the acid-base solutions topic.

References

Ainsworth, S. (2014). The Multiple Representation Principle in Multimedia Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition, 464–486. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.024

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! Computers & Education, 166, 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159

Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconceptions in chemistry: Addressing perceptions in chemical education. Misconceptions in Chemistry: Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education, 1–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70989-3/COVER

Broman, K. (2020). Chapter 4. Engagement and Relevance Through Context-based, Everyday Life, Open-ended Chemistry Problems (pp. 52–72). https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788016087-00052

Bruce, W. C., & Bruce, J. K. (1992). Teaching with Inquiry. Alpha Publishing Company.

Cattaneo, A., Schmitz, M.-L., Gonon, P., Antonietti, C., Consoli, T., & Petko, D. (2024). The role of personal and contextual factors when investigating technology integration in general and vocational education. Computers in Human Behavior, 163, 108475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108475

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2008). An evaluation of a teaching intervention to promote students’ ability to use multiple levels of representation when describing and explaining chemical reactions. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-007-9046-9/METRICS

Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2016.11.005

Chen, C.-Y., Yang, S.-H., Xie, M.-X., Fan, Y.-C., Wang, J.-H., & Chen, G.-D. (2023). Creating Meaningful Connections: The Role of Simultaneous Multi-Situational Learning in Knowledge Contextualization and Application. International Conference on Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.58459/ICCE.2023.1013

Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 8(3), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90035F

Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2016). Design of learning objects for concept learning: effects of multimedia learning principles and an instructional approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1355–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1006237

Chiu, T. K. F., & Hew, T. K. F. (2018). Factors influencing peer learning and performance in MOOC asynchronous online discussion forum. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.3240

Chiu, T. K. F., Lin, T. J., & Lonka, K. (2021). Motivating Online Learning: The Challenges of COVID-19 and Beyond. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40299-021-00566-W/METRICS

Consoli, T., Désiron, J., & Cattaneo, A. (2023). What is “technology integration” and how is it measured in K-12 education? A systematic review of survey instruments from 2010 to 2021. Computers & Education, 197, 104742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104742

Davies, R. S., & West, R. E. (2014). Technology Integration in Schools. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition, 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_68

Derman, A., & Ebenezer, J. (2020). The Effect of Multiple Representations of Physical and Chemical Changes on the Development of Primary Pre-service Teachers Cognitive Structures. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1575–1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9744-5

Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2010.03.003

Eichler, J. F. (2020). Case Studies in Chemistry: Engaging Students by Connecting Chemistry to Real World Issues. ACS Symposium Series, 1343, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1021/BK-2020-1343.CH013

Fauzia, E., Lutfi, A., & Yonata, B. (2017). The Development of SABC (Solve Acid Base Case) Game Oriented Android as Intructional Media Acid Base for Eleventh Grade Senior High School. DEVELOPMENT, 6(2), 339–344.

Fraile, M. N., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Lacambra, A. M. M. (2018). Development of Digital Competence in Secondary Education Teachers’ Training. Education Sciences 2018, Vol. 8, Page 104, 8(3), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI8030104

Fütterer, T., Scheiter, K., Cheng, X., & Stürmer, K. (2022). Quality beats frequency? Investigating students’ effort in learning when introducing technology in classrooms. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 69, 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2022.102042

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2020a). Students’ competence in translating between different types of chemical representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00301G

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2020b). Students’ competence in translating between different types of chemical representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00301G

Glynn, S. M., & Winter, L. K. (2004). Contextual teaching and learning of science in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16, 51–63.

Halawa, A. A., Yulita, I., & Adriani, N. (2022). The development of Acid-Base Electronic Chemistry Comic Learning Media for High School Students. Journal of Science Education Research, 6(1), 24–30.

Hammer, M., & Avram, E. M. G. (2024). Online Interactive Activity: Using a Web-Based Multimedia Activity to Teach Balancing Chemical Equations. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(10), 4510–4516. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00786

Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856/METRICS

Hu, L., Chen, G., Li, P., & Huang, J. (2021). Multimedia Effect in Problem Solving: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1717–1747. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-021-09610-Z

Hwang, G.-J., Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C., Chu, H.-C., Kinshuk, K., Chen, C.-Y., & Chen, C.-Y. (2012). A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry... Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5).

Johnson, E. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It’s Here to Stay. Sage Publication.

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x

Jones, L. L. (2013). How Multimedia-Based Learning and Molecular Visualization Change the Landscape of Chemical Education Research. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(12), 1571–1576. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4001206

Kapici, H. O. (2023). From Symbolic Representation to Submicroscopic One: Preservice Science Teachers’ Struggle with Chemical Representation Levels in Chemistry. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(1), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJRES.3122

Kozma, R. B. (2002). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education: Advanced Designs for Technologies of Learning, 11–46. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602671-8/TH-USE-MULTIPLE-REPRESENTATIONS-SOCIAL-CONSTRUCTION-UNDERSTANDING-CHEMISTRY-ROBERT-KOZMA

Lee, T. T., & Osman, K. (2012). Interactive Multimedia Module in the Learning of Electrochemistry: Effects on Students’ Understanding and Motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1323–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.295

Lin, Y. I., Son, J. Y., & Rudd, J. A. (2016). Asymmetric translation between multiple representations in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1144945

Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of Learning Method Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) for Increasing Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(3), 37–46.

Lucila, G. M. T., & Adolfo, E. O. Valdivia. Dr. (2021). Introducing Chemistry of Cleaning through Context-Based Learning in a High-School Chemistry Course. American Journal of Educational Research, 9(6), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-6-2

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia Learning.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-007-9047-2/METRICS

Murni, H. P., Azhar, M., Ellizar, E., Nizar, U. K., & Guspatni, G. (2022). Three levels of chemical representation-integrated and structured inquiry-based reaction rate module: Its effect on students’ mental models. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 758–772. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.148

Muslim, F. E., & Ardhana, I. A. (2023). Development of Android-Based Chemistry Virtual Laboratory Media on Acid-Base Materials for 11th Grade High School Students. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 11(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i2.7222

Nagel, I., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Afdal, H. W. (2023). Teacher educators’ professional agency in facilitating professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2023.104238

Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things. www.basickbooks.com

Nurani, I., & Suyanta. (2024). Development of Multiple Representation-based Electronic Teaching Materials Using Guided Inquiry on Acid-Base Topic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 1674–1683.

Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple Representations in Physics and Science Education – Why Should We Use Them? (pp. 1–22). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_1

Opona, A. J., Sanchez, J. M., & Bondoc, K. (2022). Use of Multiple Representations in Online General Chemistry Class: Promoting Chemical Understanding during the Covid-19 Pandemic. KIMIKA, 33(2), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.26534/kimika.v33i2.21-33

Osman, K., & Lee, T. T. (2014). Impact of Interactive Multimedia Module with Pedagogical Agents on Students’ Understanding and Motivation in the Learning of Electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-013-9407-Y/METRICS

Pangemanan, A. (2020). Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach on Statistics Material Against Student Results. International Education Studies, 13(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n4p1

Prasetyo, Y. D., Ikhsan, J., & Sari, R. L. P. (2014). The development of android-based mobile learning media as chemistry learning for senior high school on acid base, buffer, solution, and salt hydrolysis. Journal Education of Mathematics and Science, 15, 18.

Reid, N. (2021). Chapter 3. Johnstone’s Triangle: Why Chemistry Is Difficult (pp. 48–71). Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781839163661-00048

Rodiah, S., Diawati, C., Kadaritna, N., & Fadiawati, N. (2012). Developing Animation Media of Arrhenius Acid-Base Based on Multiple Representation. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 1(2), 1–15.

Sarwari, K., & Kakar, A. F. (2023). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through Contextual Teaching and Learning. Journal of Cognition, Emotion & Education, 1(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.22034/CEE.2023.172192

Schmidt, S. J. (2021). Helping students connect the macroscopic level to the molecular level. Journal of Food Science Education, 20(4), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12232

Sears, S. (2003). Introduction to Contextual Teaching and Learning. Fastback. ERIC.

Sristy, S. M. I. H., Muteti, C. Z., Vasquez, Y., & Mutambuki, J. M. (2023). Integrating Real-World Contexts and Application Cards Activities in the General Chemistry I Course Increases Students’ Achievement Scores and Perceptions of Chemistry Relevance. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4608–4618. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00516

Taber, K. S. (2013). Three levels of chemistry educational research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP90003G

Tarawi, O., Noer, A. M., & Linda, R. (2020). The development of acid-base e-chemistry magazine as interactive teaching materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012012

Tavares, P. R., Pereira, D. A. de S., De Brito, F. C., De Sá, G. B., Gomes, L. F., Fujiyoshi, M. R. dos S., Modesto, V. T., & Da Cruz, R. C. das V. (2024). The role of digital information and communication technologies in modern education. CONTRIBUCIONES A LAS CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 17(2), e4980. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.17n.2-015

Thiagarajan. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children . National Center for Improvement Educational System.

Trang, D., Thompson, M. S., Clark, B. E., -, al, Wohlfarth, K. S., Wöhler, C., Grumpe -, A., Luviani, S. D., Mulyani, S., & Widhiyanti, T. (2021). A review of three levels of chemical representation until 2020. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012206. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012206

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Hardvard University Press.

Wiguna, M. A., & Zamhari, M. (2023). Development of Google Sites-based Multiple Representations Learning Media on Benzene and Its Derivatives Topic. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 8(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.15575/JTK.V8I1.25666

Wu, H., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126

Wu, Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.1033;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Yunitasari, I., Widarti, H. R., & Nazriati, N. (2019). Miskonsepsi Asam Basa Berbasis Multipel Representasi pada Lintas Jenjang Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(12), 1635. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i12.13082

Zhu, J., Dawson, K., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2020). Investigating How Multimedia and Modality Design Principles Influence Student Learning Performance, Satisfaction, Mental Effort, and Visual Attention. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29(3), 265–284.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Mutiarasani, D. R., Wiguna, M. A., Tafani, T., & Suyanta, S. (2025). Development of Interactive Multimedia on Acids and Bases Contextually (IMPAC) Incorporating Multiple Representations. Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 14(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v14i2.15518

Issue

Section

Articles