Scientific Argumentation in Chemistry Education: A Literature Review of Practices, Challenges, And Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v14i1.14666Keywords:
chemistry education, literatur review, scientific argumentation skilssAbstract
This study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) on students' scientific argumentation skills in chemistry education, focusing on practices, challenges, and potential solutions. Articles selected were sourced from the Scopus database using Publish or Perish (PoP) and published within the period of 2015-2024. Some of the notable issues identified in this review relate specifically to limited teacher preparation and low student engagement, which hinder the development of argumentation skills. Effective instructional models, strategies, and media that promote argument-driven learning are crucial according to these findings. Also, enhancing these specific skills requires targeted teacher training, curriculum integration of argumentative practices, and supportive classroom environments that cultivate inquiry-based learning and critical thinking. Generally, it sheds light on the importance of valid assessment tools to evaluate students' argumentation skills. Thus, strengthening these skills is essential for classroom members. Not only for acquiring a better understanding of chemical concepts but also for promoting scientific literacy as well as informed decision-making in broader societal contexts.References
AACTE. (2010). Teachers for the 21st Century. Education, (September), 1–40. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teachers-for-the-21st-century_9789264193864-en
Aflalo, E., & Gabay, E. (2013). Learning Approach and Learning: Exploring a New Technological Learning System. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070114
Al-Ajm, B., & Ambusaidi, A. (2022). The Level of Scientific Argumentation Skills in Chemistry Subject among Grade 11th Students: The Role of Logical Thinking. Science Education International, 33(1), 66–74. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7
Aldahmash, A. H., & Omar, S. H. (2021). Analysis of activities included in Saudi Arabian chemistry textbooks for the inclusion of argumentation-driven inquiry skills. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100968
Arslan, H. O., Genc, M., & Durak, B. (2023). Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103905
Bambut, K. E. N., & Rahayu, S. (2020). The patterns of discussion in teaching argumentation skills in chemistry learning. In 3rd International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education: Strengthening Mathematics and Science Education Research for the Challenge of Global Society, ICoMSE 2019 (p. 020003). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000529
Chen, J. (2020). Environmental Education, Knowledge and Awareness in China: A Case of Xiamen University Students. ASIANetwork Exchange A Journal for Asian Studies in the Liberal Arts, 27(1), 54–72. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.16995/ane.298
Do Vale, W. K. M., Batinga, V. T. S., & Do Nascimento Firme, R. (2023). Análise De Textos Argumentativos Produzidos Pelos Licenciandos De Química Sobre A Questão Sociocientífica Utilização De Agrotóxicos Nas Lavouras Brasileiras. Investigações Em Ensino de Ciências, 28(2), 218–239. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2023v28n2p218
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher (Vol. 23). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(200005)84:3<287::aid-sce1>3.0.co;2-a
Duhita, Suyono, S., Harun, N., Bertha, Y., Anggita, I. K. D., & Wardani, S. (2021). The Validity of the Internalized Argumentation Skills Test for Chemistry Students. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 328). EDP Sciences. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132806008
Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., Bakar, A., & Harizon. (2020). Skills to argue: Using argument-based learning (AbL) and socio-scientific issues to promote university students’ argumentation skills in chemistry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1567). Institute of Physics Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022042
Effendi-Hsb, M. H., Harizon, Ngatijo, Fuldiaratman, & Sulistyo, U. (2019). Promoting indonesian secondary school students’ argumentation skills in the concept of chemistry reaction-rate: A comparative effect of three cooperative learning strategies. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1317). Institute of Physics Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012143
Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran Dengan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Melalui PBL (Problem Based Learning). Biodidaktika, Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(2). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v13i2.3677
Farida, A., Rosidin, U., Herlina, K., & Hasnunidah, N. (2018). The Influence Of Application Argument Driven Inquiry Model To Junior High School Studen’t Argumenttion Skills Based On Difference Of Gender. Journal of Physics and Science Learning, 02.
Fitria, R., Wiyarsi, A., Dyana, M. R., & Arifa, M. F. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Argumentation skill towards Socio-Scientific Issues in Chemistry Learning. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 159–163). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/3631991.3632015
Gazali, A., Hidayat, A., & Yuliati, L. (2015). Efektivitas Model Siklus Belajar 5E terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (JPS), 3(1), 10–16. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17977/jps.v3i0.4833
Gazali, F., Rahayu, S., Munzil, M., & Wonorahardjo, S. (2024). Profile of The First Year Student’s Argumentation Skills on General Chemistry Courses at a Public University in West Sumatera: A Preliminary Study. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 481). EDP Sciences. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448104004
Hardini, S. D., & Alberida, H. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Peserta Didik. Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 17(1).
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2020). The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.6
Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the Epistemological Underpinnings of Students’ and Scientists’ Reasoning about Conclusions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach (Vol. 38).
Hosbein, K. N., Lower, M. A., & Walker, J. P. (2021). Tracking Student Argumentation Skills across General Chemistry through Argument-Driven Inquiry Using the Assessment of Scientific Argumentation in the Classroom Observation Protocol. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(6), 1875–1887. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01225
Ilmi, I., Janah, N., & Subroto, W. T. (2019). Comparison Of Cooperative Learning Models With Inquiry on Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4, 178–182. Retrieved from www.ijere.com
Inkomara, W. Y., & Suyono, S. (2023). Kelayakan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Melalui Model Argument Driven Inquiry Pada Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Redoks : Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Dan Ilmu Kimia, 6(1), 19–26. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.33627/re.v6i1.1133
Karadeniz, A., & Üniversitesi, A. E. (2016). The relationship between faculty of education students’ argumentation skills and critical thinking, creative thinking and problem solving skills. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, (Special Issue for INTE 2016). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312130770
Karpudewan, M., Michael Roth, W., & Sinniah, D. (2016). The role of green chemistry activities in fostering secondary school students’ understanding of acid-base concepts and argumentation skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 893–901. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00079g
Laily, T. R. N., Prastika, A., Marfu’Ah, S., & Suharti, S. (2020). Learning buffer solution through modified POGIL justified by student’s scientific argumentation skills. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2215). American Institute of Physics Inc. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000690
Lourenço, A. B., Ferreira, J. Q., & Queiroz, S. L. (2016). Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers And Scientific Argumentation: Trends In Discursive Actions In Classroom. Química Nova. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.20160035
Majid, A. (2013). Penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya .
Masbakhah, I. M., Utami, S. Y., & Nurbaity, N. (2019). Analysis of students’ argumentation skills in chemistry class of grade XI through product life-cycle analysis assessment on colloid lesson. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157). Institute of Physics Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042013
Nakano, T. de C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21st Century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(3), 237–246. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300002
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
Nurdiyanti, D., Permanasari, A., & Mulyani, S. (2020). Learning Electrochemistry With A Modified Writing To Teach Approach To Enhance Student’s Argumentation Skills. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, (Special Issue on AASEC2019), 68–79.
Primadianningsih, C., Sumarni, W., & Sudarmin, S. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Analysis of Ethno-STEM and Student’s Chemistry Literacy Profile in 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 650–659. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2559
Putri, R. A., Munzil, M., & Sumari, S. (2021). Developing multiple representation’s teaching materials assisted by blended learning to enhance students’ scientific argumentation skills. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330). American Institute of Physics Inc. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043261
Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56–66. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i2.454
Rusmini, Suyono, & Agustini, R. (2024). Effectiveness of the Connected Learning Cycle (CLC) For Training Scientific Literacy Skills And Argumentation Skills In Prospective Chemistry Teacher Students. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 18(3). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-154
Saija, M., Rahayu, S., Parlan, P., & Fajaroh, F. (2023). The Effect of Chemistry Instruction Strategy Contextualized by Local SSI-OE3C on The High School Students’ Argumentation Skills. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2569). American Institute of Physics Inc. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113474
Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2
Septyastuti, H. L., Sutrisno, S., & Widarti, H. R. (2021). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning with OE3R strategy for scientific argumentation skill. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330). American Institute of Physics Inc. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043148
Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 7. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x
Sulistina, O., Rahayu, S., Dasna, I. W., & Yahmin. (2024). Enhancing the scientific argumentation skills of prospective chemistry teacher using integrated chemical literacy strategy. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(6), 4346–4353. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.26935
Suyono, Nasrudin, H., Yonata, B., & Sabtiawan, W. B. (2021). The Claims Statements from Viral Videos for Instrument Development to Assess Argumentation Thinking Skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1899). IOP Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012174
University of Kansas. (2009). Learning-Strategies. The University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.
Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., Tuysuz, M., Sarici, E., Soysal, C., & Kilinc, S. (2021). The role of the argumentation-based laboratory on the development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ argumentation skills. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 30–55. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1846226
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tiara Swastika Putri, Suyanta Suyanta, Eli Rohaeti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.