Computational Thinking Skill of Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Statistic Methods Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v14i1.14559Keywords:
computational thinking, mathematics education, prospective mathematics , statisticsAbstract
The statistics methods course is compulsory in the Mathematics Study Program, which uses applications according to technological developments, including the SPSS application. This study describes the computational Thinking of prospective mathematics teachers in solving statistics problems in statistics methods courses. This research is quantitative-qualitative descriptive research. The subjects were 88 students in the statistics methods course in the 2022/2023 academic year. The research instrument was a test containing three statistics problems. The findings have indicated that the computational Thinking of prospective mathematics teachers in solving statistics problems was in the Very Good Category with a percentage of 2,27%, the Good Category was 31,8%, the Enough category was 38,64%, the low Category was 19,32%, and the deficient Category was 7,95%. The researchers suggest that ongoing research needs to be conducted to improve students' computational thinking skills, and it is necessary to look for factors that influence students' computational thinking skills.References
Aminah, N., Maat, S. M., & Sudarsono, S. (2023). Computational Thinking of Prospective Mathematics Teacher Viewed from Entrepreneur Character. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.2597
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Wardono, W., & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). Computational Thinking Process of Prospective Mathematics Teacher in Solving Diophantine Linear Equation Problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1495–1507. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1495
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Bandung (ed.)). PT. Rineka Cipta.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver, Canada.
Booconi, S., Chioccarielio, A., Earp, J. (2018). The Nordic Approach to Introducing Computational Thinking and Programming in Compulsory Education. Report prepared for the Nordic@BETT2018 Steering Group. https://doi.org/10.17471/54007
Chan, S., Looi, C., & Sumintono, B. (2020). Assessing Computational Thinking Abilities among Singapore Secondary Students: A Rasch model measurement analysis. Journal of Computers in Education,8(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00177-2 Notice:
Fauzi, A. L., Kusumah, Y. S., Nurlaelah, E., & Juandi, D. (2024). Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Kependidikan, 10(2), 640–653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i2.11140
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
Hapizah, Muli, M. A., & Mulyono, B. (2024). Assessing seventh-grade students ’ computational thinking skills through problem-based learning : Focus on integer addition and subtraction. Journal of Honai Math, 7(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v7i2.560
He, Z., Wu, X., Wang, Q., & Huang, C. (2021). Developing Eighth-Grade Students ’ Computational Thinking with Critical Reflection. Sustainability, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011192
Islami, A., Fatra, M., & Diwidian, F. (2023). Model Search , Solve , Create , and Share untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Self Efficacy. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(November 2023), 453–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v3i3.1508
Julianti, N. H., Darmawan, P., & Mutimmah, D. (2022). Computational Thinking dalam Memecahkan Masalah High Order Thinking Skill Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional MIPA UNIBA 2022, 1–7.
Kalelioglu, F., Gulbahar, Y., Kukul, V. (2016). A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. Baltic J. Modern Computing. 4(3), 583-596.
Lestari, Y., Prastyawan, A., Arlupi Utami, D., & Gamaputra, G. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Pelayanan Publik Melalui Motode Virtual Learning Virtual learning, innovative learning, method of ADDIE. http://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/dimensi/index
Lodi, M., & Martini, S. (2021). Computational Thinking, Between Papert and Wing. Science and Education, 30(4), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00202-5
M. Gunawan Supiarmo, Turmudi, & Elly Susanti. (2021). Proses Berpikir Komputasional Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pisa Konten Change and Relationship Berdasarkan Self-Regulated Learning. Numeracy, 8(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v8i1.1378
Maharani, S., Agustina, Z. F., & Kholid, M. N. (2021). Exploring the Prospective Mathematics Teachers Computational Thinking in Solving Pattern Geometry Problem. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1756–1767. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1181
Muthma’innah, M. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Mastery of Mathematical Concepts Material for Linear Equations in Two Variables. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v12i2.11070
Pei, C. (Yu), Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2018). Cultivating Computational Thinking Practices and Mathematical Habits of Mind in Lattice Land. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403543
Rahmadani, H., Roza, Y., & Murni, A. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan Bahan Ajar Matematika Berbasis Teknologi Informasi ( TI ) di SMA IT Al Bayyinah Pekanbaru. 1(1), 91–98.
Rahmadhani, L. I. P., & Mariani, S. (2021). Kemampuan Komputasional Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika SMP Melalui Digital Project Based Learning Ditinjau dari Self Efficacy. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 4, 289–297. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/
Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Ibarra-Vazquez, G. (2023). Unlocking Sustainable Development Goals through Computational Thinking : A Search to Inform Computers Education from Citizen Science Dataset. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594441.3594449
Rijal Kamil, M., Ihsan Imami, A., Prasetyo Abadi, A., Matematika, P., & Singaperbangsa Karawang, U. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir komputasional matematis Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Cikampek pada materi pola bilangan. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 259–270.
Sari, D. M., Suhendra, & Elah Nurlaelah. (2024). How Prospective Mathematics Teachers Do Computational Thinking (CT) Task? : An Analysis Of CT Prior Knowledge. Hipotenusa: Journal of Mathematical Society, 6(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v6i1.1908
Selby, C. C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational thinking: The developing definition. University of Southampton, UK
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Simanjuntak, E., Armanto, D., & Dewi, I. (16935). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pisa konten change and relationship. Jurnal Fibonaci, 04(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/doi: https://doi.org/10.24114/jfi.v2i1 Jurnal
Sundendar, A., Santika, S., Supratman, & Nurkamilah, M. (2020). The Analysis of Mathematics Students ’ Computational Thinking Ability at Universitas Siliwangi The Analysis of Mathematics Students ’ Computational Thinking Ability at Universitas Siliwangi. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042022
Susanti. R.D., Taufiq, M. (2021). Analysis of Student Computational Thinking in Solving Social Statistics Problems. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education). 5(1), 22-31, .https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v5i1.4376
Swaid, S. I. (2015). Bringing computational thinking to STEM education. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 3657–3662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.761
Tayeb, T., Idris, R., & Sulherah, A. (2014). Peranan mata kuliah statistika dalam memahami mata kuliah metodologi penelitian bagi mahasiswa jurusan pendidikan matematika fakultas tarbiyah dan keguruan UIN Alauddin Makassar. MaPan : Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 105–122.
United Nation. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Voogt, J., Fisser., P., God., J. (2015). Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education: Towards an Agenda for Research and Practice. Education and Information Technologies. 20(4), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2006). Explanation-based learning. Communications of The ACM,49(3),33–35. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16812-43
Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2014). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends, 58(6), 53–60.
Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2016). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2831250
Yuntawati, Y., Sanapiah, S., & Aziz, L. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Computational Thinking Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v9i1.3898
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Juhairiah, Hidayah Ansori, Rizki Amalia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.