ACCREDITED
PEOPLE
POLICIES
SUBMISSIONS
Submissions Author Guidelines Reviewer Guidelines Plagiarism Screening Privacy Statement Ethical Oversigh
Management of Education: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam (MoE) recognizes that the advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools and extensive language models offers unprecedented opportunities for enhancing scholarly communication while simultaneously posing new risks to research integrity, transparency, and accountability. Drawing upon the STM Association's 2023 White Paper on Generative AI in Scholarly Communications and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Position Statement on Authorship and AI Tools, MoE hereby establishes a comprehensive policy governing the use of GenAI across all stages of manuscript preparation, peer review, editorial decision-making, and post-publication activities. This policy is designed to ensure that the benefits of AI, such as increased efficiency in language polishing and data synthesis, are harnessed in ways that preserve the highest standards of scholarly rigor, ethical responsibility, and intellectual ownership.
Acceptable AI Use and Responsibilities for Authors
Authors submitting to MoE may employ GenAI tools for basic linguistic and formatting tasks such as grammar correction, style consistency, and reference formatting without explicit disclosure, provided that such use does not alter the work's intellectual content or conceptual contributions. However, any deployment of GenAI that substantively shapes the research narrative, generates novel textual passages, performs data analysis, creates illustrative figures, or otherwise influences the study's conceptualization must be transparently reported. Such disclosures should appear in a dedicated "AI Contributions" subsection within the Methods or Acknowledgments, specifying the tool, version, provider, and the precise nature of its input and output. Under no circumstances may GenAI systems be credited as authors, as they lack the legal personhood and ethical capacity to assume responsibility for scholarly claims. Responsibility for all human-written or AI-assisted content remains with the human authors, who must verify the accuracy, originality, and appropriate citation of all AI-generated elements.
Editorial and Peer Review Protocols
Editorial staff and peer reviewers are likewise bound by strict guidelines to safeguard confidentiality and uphold ethical review standards. MoE prohibits using public GenAI platforms for plagiarism detection, confidentiality screening, or automated decision-making, given the opacity of their training data and uncertain data retention policies. Instead, editors may engage specialized, publisher-approved AI services under formal contracts, ensuring robust safeguards for manuscript confidentiality, intellectual property, and data security. All final editorial decisions must rest on human judgment; AI outputs may inform but must not supplant the expertise of editors or reviewers. Reviewers are expressly forbidden from uploading unpublished manuscripts to public AI platforms or using such platforms to draft reports to maintain the review process's integrity and confidentiality. Should a reviewer suspect undisclosed substantive AI use by authors, they should flag these concerns to the handling editor, referencing COPE's guidance on suspected AI misuse in peer review.
Scholarly Transparency
MoE calls on readers and the broader scholarly community to respect the boundaries of GenAI use. Readers should refrain from submitting full-text MoE articles to public AI models to protect authors' intellectual property and preserve the confidentiality of unpublished data. Published articles incorporating substantive AI-assisted contributions will carry a clear footnote indicating the extent of AI involvement, enabling readers to assess the provenance and reliability of the findings in context.
Future Revisions
Compliance with this policy will be monitored through periodic audits of published content and implementing COPE's flowcharts to address ethical breaches. Instances of undisclosed or inappropriate AI use may trigger MoE misconduct procedures, potentially leading to corrections, retractions, or other remedial actions. Recognizing the rapidly evolving nature of GenAI technologies, MoE will review and update this policy at least biennially or in response to significant technological or ethical developments. Through these measures, MoE reaffirms its commitment to fostering innovation while upholding the core values of transparency, accountability, and scholarly excellence.
ACCREDITED
PEOPLE
POLICIES
SUBMISSIONS
Submissions Author Guidelines Reviewer Guidelines Plagiarism Screening Privacy Statement Ethical Oversigh
INFORMATION
Management of Education: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam (MoE)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN (Online): 2808-408X | ISSN (Print): 2442-4048 | Email: [email protected] |Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin