Proses Pemodelan Saintifik pada Miskonsepsi Mekanika Kuantum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.1986Abstract
The process of misconceptions about the concepts of quantum physics in students needs to be comprehensively analyzed. This is because most of the revision process of student misconception is done directly by simply replacing the wrong explanation with the correct explanation. While to understand the theory and hypothesis of quantum physics phenomena requires abstract physics model and formal mathematical language. Modeling done by the mind sometimes does not require image image in the brain. As between the wave function and the particle position associated with the mathematical model. The misconceptions in quantum physics occur because of the wrong scientific conceptual modeling process. The scientific conceptual model is divided into four dimensions: domain, composition, structure and organization. Analysis of the misconception process modeling using these dimensions will be done on the phenomenon of quantum physics. The misunderstanding of the definition of the wave function concept Ѱ (x) occurs due to the incorrect dimensions of the model's interactive structure. While the misconception of the concept of quantity of energy and the relationship of wave function with probability, occurs in the dimension of the behavioral structure of the model. In the concept of position measurement and momentum of quantum systems, errors occur in both structures.References
Edward-Leis, C. 2012, “Challenging learning journeys in the classroom: Using mental model theory to inform how pupils think when they are generating solutions”, (Stockholm,) pp. 153-162.
Etkitna, E., Warren, A. & Gentile, M. 2005, ‘The role model in physics instruction’, New Brunswick, NJ, vol. 44, no. 1 , pp. 34-39
Greca I. M. & Freire J. O., 2003. Does an Emphasis on the Concept of Quantum States Enhance Students’ Understanding of Quantum Mechanics?, J. Science & Education, Vol. 12, pp 541–557
Greca, I. M. & Moreira, M. A. 2000, ‘Mental models, conceptual models, and modeling’, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 22, pp. 1-11.
Halloun, J., 1996, Schematic Modeling for Meaningful Learning of Physics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 33, Iss. 9
Hestenes, D., 1987, Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction, Am. J. Phys. Vol. 55 No. 5, pp 440-454.
Kalkanis G, 2003, An Instructional Model for Radical Conceptual Change Towards Quantum Mechanics Concepts, Inc. Sci Ed Vol. 87, pp 257–280.
Olsen, R. V. 2002, ‘Introducing quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: a study in Norway’, International Juornal of Science Education. Vol. 24 no. 6, pp. 565-574.
Ornek, F., 2008, ‘Model in Science Education: Applications of models in learning and teaching science’, International Juornal of envinronmental & Science Education, Vol. 3, no. 2 , pp. 35-45.
Ozcan O. & Gercek C.,2015, Students’ Mental Models of Light to Explain the Compton Effect, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 191, pp 2195 – 2197
Singh, C., Belloni, M. & Christian, W., 2006, ‘Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics, Journal of American Institute Of Physics’, vol 59, no. 8, pp. 43-49,
Styer, D. F., 1996, Common Misconceptions Regarding Quantum Mechanics American Journal of Physics, vol. 64, pp 31-34.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
