A NARRATIVE INQUIRY ON HOW TEACHER PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY INFLUENCES TEACHER’S SCHOOL TYPE PREFERENCE

Maria Dewi Rosari

Abstract


Some Indonesian English teachers prefer teaching in formal schools while some others favor non-formal schools more. This preference can be analyzed from the lense of teacher professional identity. In this study, the researcher tried to find out how teacher professional identity influences the school type teachers favor more. By conducting in-depth interviews to two non-formal school teachers from different regions in Indonesia, the researchers found out that job satisfaction, self-efficacy, occupational commitment, and occupational motivation are the factors influencing the participants’ professional identity the most. Job satisfaction could be seen, for example, in witnessing students’ progress more thoroughly; self-efficacy in being able to monitor their teaching performance; occupational commitment in teacher trainings provided by non-formal schools to build their career up; and occupational motivation in receiving manageable challenges from non-formal schools that trigger eagerness from the participants to work. Those findings could function as a reference for both formal and non-formal school stake holders in making sure that their schools could accommodate their teachers’ need in constructing their professional identity as it could influence teachers’ performance a lot.


Keywords


Teacher Professional Identity, Teacher Professional Identity Elements, Non-formal School, Formal School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arlen, E. (1993). What is Nonformal Education ? Journal of Agricultural Education, Winter(12), 72–77.

Ayeni, A. J., & Amanekwe, A. P. (2018). Teachers’ Instructional Workload Management and Students ’ Academic Performance in Public and Private Secondary Schools in Akoko North- East Local Government , Ondo State , Nigeria. American International Journal of Education and Linguistics Research, 1(1), 9–23.

Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252

Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001

Billinton, R., & Chenjian Wu. (2006). Measuring job satisfaction in surveys - Comparative analytical report. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 719–724. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccece.2001.933530

Canrinus, E. T., Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2011). Profiling teachers’ sense of professional identity. Educational Studies, 37(5), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2010.539857

Charmaz, K. (2001). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 6396–6399. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00775-0

Cohen, E. H. (2007). Researching Informal Education: a Preliminary Mapping. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 93(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910630709300106

Coombs, P. H., & Ahmed, M. (1974). Attacking Rural Poverty: How Nonformal Education Can Help. A Research Report for the World Bank Prepared by the International Council for Educational Development.

Davis, J., & Wilson, S. M. (2000). Principals’ Efforts to Empower Teachers: Effects on Teacher Motivation and Job Satisfaction and Stress. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73(6), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650009599442

de la Torre Cruz, M. J., & Casanova Arias, P. F. (2007). Comparative analysis of expectancies of efficacy in in-service and prospective teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.005

Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104

Firestone, W. A. (1996). Images of teaching and proposals for reform: A comparison of ideas from cognitive and organizational research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(2), 209–235.

Friedman, I. A., & Kass, E. (2002). Teacher self-efficacy: A classroom-organization conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(6), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00027-6

Ioan, J., & Istrate, E. (2008). Manual de pedagogie. Ed. All, București.

Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 485–516. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142105

Lee, K., Carswell, J. J., & Allen, N. J. (2000). A meta-analytic review of occupational commitment: Relations with person- and work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.799

Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538.

Mottet, T. P., Beebe, S. A., Raffeld, P. C., & Medlock, A. L. (2004). The effects of student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Communication Education, 53(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520410001682410

Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL, (June 2015), 1–323. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505056

Schemjrp, P. G., Sparkes, A. C., & Templin, T. J. (1999). Identity and induction: Establishing the self in the first years of teaching. The Role of Self in Teacher Development, 142–161.

Sinclair, C., Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2006). Motivations to teach: Psychometric perspectives across the first semester of teacher tducation. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1132–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00688.x

Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Sage publications.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202

VAN DER PLOEG, J., & SCHOLTE, E. (2003). Arbeidssatisfactie onder leerkrachten. Pedagogiek (Assen), 23(4), 276–290.

Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 408–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.002




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/let.v9i2.3272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Maria Dewi Rosari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Printed ISSN : 2086-9606 | Online ISSN  : 2549-2454

  

 

LET Journal Indexed by:

Creative Commons License
LET (LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING) http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/index licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.