Hafizhatun Nadia


This study based on the English Department students of the second semester of STAIN Palangka Raya problems in Reading Comprehension. This study was interested in overcoming the problems by applying a particular strategy in the teaching-learning process to help the students comprehend texts better. The strategy proposed in this study is Question Answer Relationship (QAR) Strategy. The research subjects in this study were 36 students.  In this study, the researcher used Classroom Action Research (CAR) as research design. The data in this study were collected from test, and field note.  It was found that there was an improvement in the students’ ability in Reading Comprehension after Question Answer Relationship (QAR) strategy was applied. The preliminary study result showed that the average score of the students was 60.77. In the first cycle the students’ average score developed to 69.99 and it developed to 77.80 in the second cycle. Related to preliminary study, only 10 (27.78%) of the students who got score ≥ 70. In the first cycle, there were 19 (52.78%) out of 36 students who got scores ≥ 70, and in second cycle, there were 32 (88.88%) of the students got score ≥ 70 which was the minimum standard of criterion of the success. Based on the result of the study above, it was proven that Question Answer Relationship (QAR) strategy can improve the students’ reading comprehension skills.


QAR strategy, CAR and reading Problems

Full Text:



Alderson, J. Charles. (2003). Assessing Reading. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, Neil J. (1999). Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies. Canada: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.

Burns, P.C., Roe, B., & Ross, E.P. (1996). Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Carrel, Patricia L., Devine, Joanne, Eskey, David E. (1988). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.

CCSSO Adolescent Literacy Toolkit. (2007). Content Area Literacy Guide. ( Accessed on January 2nd, 2011).

Coe, Vicky Zygouris & Glass, Catherine. (2005). Modified QAR, (, Accessed on May 4th , 2009).

Cohen, A. D. 1994. Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Corner, Jenifer. (2006). Instructional Reading Strategy: QAR (Question/Answer Relationship). (Online). ( /QAR.htm, Accessed on May 2nd, 2010).

Crawford, Alan., Saul, Wendy., & Mathews, Samuel R. (2005). Teaching and Learning Strategies for the Thinking Classroom. New York: Open Society Institute.

Darwis, Djamaluddin. (1999). English for Islamic Studies. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Dennis, Sarrah & Shaw. (2010). Guided Comprehension: Self-Questioning Using Question-Answer Relationships. ( Accessed on December 17th , 2010).

Djiwandono, M. S. (1996). Tes Bahasa: Pegangan Bagi Pengajar Bahasa.. Jakarta:PT Indeks.

English Online. Collaborative Learning. ( collaborative-learning. Accessed on December 17th , 2010).

Harmer, Jeremy. (1998). How to Teach English: An Introduction to the Practice of English language Teaching. England:Longman.

Harris, Karen R., & Graham, Steve. (2007). Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. London: The Guilford Press.

Herrel, Adrienne., & Jordan, Michael. (2004). Fifty Strategies for Teaching Language Learners. New Jersey: Pearson Education Ltd.

Hillerich, Robert L. (1983). The Principle’s Guide to Improve Reading Instruction. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

Jones, Raymond C. (2006). Question-Answer Relationship. (Online). (http://www.qar-expl.htm, Accessed on May 2nd, 2010).

Koshy, Valsa. (2007). Action Research for Improving Practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Ladewig, Brian. Reading Strategies: Scaffolding Students’ Interactions with Texts. Questions-Answer Relationship. (Online), http://www.greece.KR.NY.US/instruction/ela/62/Reading/Readingstrategies/QAR. accessed on November 30th, 2009).

Leipzig, Diane Henry. (2001). What Is Reading?. (Online)., Accessed on May 5th, 2010).

Mikulecky, Beatrice., &Jeffries, Linda. 1998. Reading Power Second Edition: Reading for Pleasure, Comprehension Skills, Thinking Skills and Reading Faster. New York: Longman

Mohamad, Akmar. (1999). What Do We Test When We Test Reading Comprehension? The Internet TES Journal, Vol. V No.12. ( Accessed on January 9th, 2011).

Novak, Joseph D.,& Canas, Alberto J. (2008). "The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct and Use Them", Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. ( Accessed on January 15th, 2011).

Pakhare, J. (2007). Effective Teaching: Reading Comprehension Strategies. ( Accessed on January 02nd, 2011).

Pang, Elizabeth S., Muaka, Angaluki, Bernhardt, Elizabeth B., & Kamil, Michael L. (2003) .Teaching Reading.(, Accessed on December 20th ,2010).

Rajabi, Payman. (2009). Cultural Orientation and Reading Comprehension Models: The Case of Iranian Rural and Urban Students. (Online). (http://www.novitasroyal.orgVol_3_1rajabi.pdf, Accessed on May 3rd, 2010) (2009). Strategies for Reading Comprehension: Question-Answer Relationships. (, Accessed on December 20th, 2010).

Roe, D Betty, Stoodt, Barbara D, & Burns, Paul C. (1995). Secondary School Reading Instruction – The Content Areas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

TeacherVision, (2010). Question-Answer Relationships. (Online). (, Accessed on May 4th, 2010).

Vacca, Richard T. & Vacca, Jo Anne L. (1999). Content Area Reading. New York: Adison- Wesley Educational.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Hafizhatun Nadia

Printed ISSN : 2086-9606 | Online ISSN  : 2549-2454



LET Journal Indexed by:

Creative Commons License
LET (LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.