Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Study of Complaint Strategies in Banjarese and Javanese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v14i2.13764Keywords:
Banjarese, Complaint strategy , Cross Culture, Javanese, PragmaticsAbstract
A cross-cultural pragmatics exploration, particularly in multicultural and multilingual settings like Indonesia, is important for understanding language used within a cultural framework. In the comparative study, Banjarese and Javanese languages are particularly underrepresented. Thus, the research investigates and compares complaint strategies that the Banjarese and Javanese use. The current study used a qualitative approach and the Discourse Completion Task (DCT), consisting of eight scenarios, to gather the data. The study consists of 50 participants, 25 Banjarese and 25 Javanese participants, ranging in age from 18 to 60 years old. The findings of the study found that Banjarese and Javanese participants utilise mostly the same strategy, namely dissatisfaction (DS) and request for repair (RR), and prefer to avoid conflict with the interlocutors. However, Banjarese participants typically prioritise immediate resolution, whereas Javanese participants prioritise expressing their dissatisfaction first. The research highlights the significant influence that cultural context has on complaint strategies and communication.References
Al-Khawaldeh, N. (2016). A Pragmatic Cross-Cultural Study of Complaints Expressions in Jordan and England. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.197
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (2. ed). Clarendon Press.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex Publ.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Y., Chen, C. D., & Chang, M.-H. (2011). American and Chinese complaints: Strategy use from a cross-cultural perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.012
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sixth edition, international student edition). Sage.
Edmondson, W. J., & House, J. (1981). Let’s talk, and talk about it: A pedagogic interactional grammar of English. Urban u. Schwarzenberg.
El-Dakhs, D. A. S., & Ahmed, M. M. (2021). A variational pragmatic analysis of the speech act of complaint focusing on Alexandrian and Najdi Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.023
Guillot, M.-N. (2019). Subtitling’s cross-cultural expressivity put to the test: A cross-sectional study of linguistic and cultural representation across Romance and Germanic languages. Multilingua, 38(5), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2018-0116
House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2020). T/V pronouns in global communication practices: The case of IKEA catalogues across linguacultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 161, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.03.001
House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2021). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954587
Huang, Y. (2014). Pragmatics (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Iwaniec, J. (2020). Questionnaires: Implications for effective implementation. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 324–335). Routledge.
Kaharuddin, A. (2020). The Speech Act of Complaint: Socio-Cultural Competence Used by Native Speakers of English and Indonesian (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3631504). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3631504
Kasper, G. (2008). Data Collection in Pragmatics Research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2. ed). Continuum.
Kecskes, I. (2016). Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Pragmatics (Y. Huang, Ed.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.29
Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
Matsukawa, C. (2024). A Contrastive Pragmatics Study of Invitations in British English and Japanese. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10113
Moon, K. (2002). Speech act study: Differences between native and nonnative speaker complaint strategies [Report]. TESOL, College of Arts and Sciences, American University. https://doi.org/10.17606/M6SW91
Olshtain, E., & Weinbach, L. (1987). A study of speech act behavior among native and non-native speakers of Hebrew: 10. Complaints. In J. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli Papi (Eds.), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference (p. 195). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.15ols
Olshtain, E., & Weinbach, L. (1993). Interlanguage Features of the Speech Act of Complaining. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Prykarpatska, I. (2008). Why are you late?: Cross-cultural pragmatic study of complaints in American English and Ukrainian. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 87. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2008.21.05
Rodriguez, A. (2022). Complaining. In F. Brisard, S. D’hondt, P. Gras, & M. Vandenbroucke (Eds.), 25th annual installment. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Salim, H. (1996). Islam Banjar, Relasi Antar Etnik, dan Pembangunan. Dalam Tim Redaksi DIAN, Kisah Dari Kampung Halaman: Masyarakat Suku, Agama Resmi Dan Pembangunan, Yogyakarta: DIAN/INTERFIDEI.
Trosborg, A. (2011). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints, and Apologies. Walter de Gruyter.
Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction (2. ed). Mouton de Gruyter.
Yang, H. (2016). A Cross-cultural Study of Complaint Strategies by Chinese and British University Students. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Education, E-Learning and Management Technology. 2016 International Conference on Education, E-learning and Management Technology, Xi’an, China. https://doi.org/10.2991/iceemt-16.2016.41
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. OUP Oxford.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rifda Fakhira, Ni Wayan Sartini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
LET (LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING) http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/index licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.