Unmasking Media Narratives through Comparative Corpus Linguistic Analysis: A Study of Russia-Ukraine Conflict
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v14i1.12737Keywords:
Media Narrative, Corpus Linguistics, Critical Discourse Analysis, Russia-Ukraine ConflictAbstract
In a world inundated with diverse media narratives, the Russia-Ukraine conflict emerges as a focal point of contention, revealing a complex interplay of linguistic strategies and discursive tactics. This study aims to unravel the intricacies of lexical choices, and discursive techniques employed by Sputnik, BBC, and Fox News in their coverage of the Russia-Ukraine conflict through corpus-assisted discourse studies techniques. Three corpora were created comprising 5,347 articles with 5,829,747 tokens, sampled from February 2022 to February 2023. Moreover, Sputnik’s diction strategically employs the phrase “military operation” while eschewing “war”, portraying the conflict as a defensive, legitimate endeavour, thus reinforcing a Russian geopolitical narrative that recasts Ukraine not as a victim but as an active participant with extremist factions. BBC, in contrast, adopts a pro-Western stance, framing Ukraine as a victim and Russia as an aggressor. Fox News calls Russia’s action as an invasion, and highlights the individual roles of political leaders in shaping the conflict. However, to address the limitations of this study, future studies can expand the scope, sources, languages, and genres for analysis. Furthermore, media consumers need to practice media literacy, cross-checking, and critical analysis in the era of overloaded information in order to form well-rounded opinions on complex geopolitical events.References
Alyahya, A. F. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of newspaper articles declaring the outbreak of war in Ukraine: The Washington Post vs. The Moscow Times. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(2), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.1982871.2969
Ancarno, C. (2020). Corpus-assisted discourse studies. In A. D. Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of discourse studies (pp. 165-185). Cambridge University Press.
Anthony, L. (2023). AntConc (Version 4.2.1) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.
Baker, W. D., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Patriotism or opinion leadership?: The nature and origins of the “Rally ‘Round the Flag” effect. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(5), 661-687.
Baraniuk, K. (2017). Corpus-based analysis as a method to identify Russian trolling activity. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(1), 239-255. Doi: 10.15804/ppsy2017115
Bartlett, B. (2015). How Fox News changed American media and political dynamics. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2604679
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. Continuum.
Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Wiley-Blackwell.
Berger, M. (2022, February 24). Putin says he will ‘denazify’ Ukraine. Here’s the history behind that claim. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/02/24/putin-denazify-ukraine/
Bhatia, M. V. (2005). Fighting words: Naming terrorists, bandits, rebels and other violent actors. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), 5-22.
Bowen, A. S. (2023). Russia’s war in Ukraine: Military and intelligence aspects. Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47068/1
Brusylovska, O., & Maksymenko, I. (2022). Analysis of the media discourse on the 2022 war in Ukraine: The case of Russia. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 15(1), 222-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12579
Chen, S. (2013). Corpus linguistics in critical discourse analysis: A case study on news reports of the 2011 Libyan civil war. Stream: Culture/ Politics/ Technology, 5(1), 21-28.
Cohen, S. F. (2019). War with Russia?: From Putin & Ukraine to Trump & Russiagate. Hot Books.
Develotte, C., & Rechniewski, E. (2001). Discourse analysis of newspaper headlines: A methodological framework for research into national representations. The Web Journal of French Media Studies, 4(1), 1-12.
Dijk, T. A. V. (1988). News as discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dijk, T. A. V. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Drid, T. (2018). The study of news: A discourse analysis perspective. Revue Elbahith en Sciences Humaines et Sociales, 2018(35B), 701-708.
Evans, R. (2013). The kid stays in the picture: A notorious life. It Books.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. Longman.
Fulton, H. (2005). Introduction: The power of narrative. In H. Fulton, R. Huisman, J. Murphet, & A. Dunn (Eds.), Narrative and media (pp. 1-7). Cambridge University Press.
Goddard, S. E. (2020). Revolution from the inside: Institutions, legitimation strategies, and rhetorical pathways of institutional change. Global Policy, 11(3), 83-92.
Greenberg, A. (2019). Sandworm: A new era of cyberwar and the hunt for the Kremlin’s most dangerous Hackers. Doubleday.
Haider, A. S. (2017). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of the representation of Qaddafi in media: Evidence from The Guardian and The NYT. Journal of Advanced Linguistic Studies, 6(1-2), 07-44.
Hamborg, F. (2023). Revealing media bias in news articles: NLP techniques for automated frame analysis. Springer.
Hamborg, F., Donnay, K., & Gipp, B. (2018). Automated identification of media bias in news articles: An interdisciplinary literature review. International Journal on Digital Libraries. 2019, 20(4), 391-415. Doi: 10.1007/s00799-018-0261-y
Henery, M. (2010). Why do we see what we see?: A comparison of CNN International, BBC World News and Al Jazeera English analyzing the respective drivers influencing editorial content [Reuters Institute Fellowship paper, University of Oxford]. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/why-do-we-see-what-we-see-comparison-cnn-international-bbc-world-news-and-al-jazeera
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
Hosseini, F. (2016). BBC versus Euronews: Discourse and ideology in news translation. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 3(7), 128-132.
Hurak, I. (2015). The Minsk Agreements of 2015: A forced step or a small achievement of the Ukrainian side within the diplomatic confrontation around the war in the Donbas. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 1(7), 124-140. Doi: 10.15804/cjps.2015.01.08
Ilin, I., & Nihmatova, O. (2023). The “Brotherly People” metaphor and the Russian-Ukrainian irredentist war: A corpus-based study. Czech Journal of International Relations, 58(2), 7-41. https://doi.org/10.32422/mv-cjir.504
Jones, C. (2022). What are the basics of analyzing a corpus?. In A. O’Keeffe & M. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 126-139). Routledge.
Kim, K. H. (2014). Examining US news media discourses about North Korea: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Discourses & Society, 25(2), 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513516043
Kryzhanivska, A. (2022). The beginnings: Russian-Ukrainian war in European, Ukrainian, and Russian media in 2014-15. Balcania et Slavia, 2(1), 9-26. Doi: 10.30687/BES/2785-3187/2022/01/001
Kutter, A., & Kantner, C. (2012). Corpus-based content analysis: A method for investigating news coverage on war and intervention. Stuttgart University.
Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Direction in corpus linguistics (trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs [tilsm]) (pp. 105-122). Walter de Gruyter.
Lohsen, A., & Morcos, P. (2022, February 9). Understanding the Normandy Format and its relation to the current standoff with Russia. Center for Strategic & International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/understanding-normandy-format-and-its-relation-current-standoff-russia
Liao, N. (2012, October 12-14). Construction and consumption of collective memory: The enabling versus constraining effects of strategic narratives and Beijing’s foreign policymaking [Conference session]. Annual Conference of the American Association for Chinese Studies, Atlanta, Georgia, US.
Liaropoulos, D. A. N. (2022). Information as an instrument of power: Lessons learned from the war in Ukraine. NATO OPEN Publication, 7(6).
Lindquist, H. (2009). Corpus linguistics and the description of English. Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Lukin, A. (2019). War and its ideologies: a social-semiotic theory and description. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0996-0
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). Language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory, and practice. Cambridge University Press.
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Nabers, D. (2009). Filling the void of meaning: Identity construction in U.S. foreign policy after September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis, 5(2), 191-214.
Nichols, M. (2022, April 8). U.N. suspends Russia from human rights body, Moscow then quits. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/un-vote-suspending-russia-human-rights-council-over-ukraine-2022-04-07/
Nisco, M. C. (2013). Reporting the 2011 London riots: A corpus-based discourse analysis of agency and participants. In A. Hardie & R. Love (Eds.), Corpus linguistic 2013: Abstract book (pp. 228-230). Lancaster: UCREL. https://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/cl2013/doc/CL2013-ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf
Partington, A. (2010). Modern diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project. Corpora, 5(2), 83-108. Doi: 10.3366/E1749503210000407
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pomerantsev, S. (2023). How to get away with war: a corpus-driven study on Russian media and the war in Ukraine in 2022 [Master’s thesis, University of Eastern Finland]. UEF//EREPOSITORY. https://erepo.uef.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/29917/urn_nbn_fi_uef-20230613.pdf?sequence=1
Reppen, R. (2010). Building a corpus: What are the key considerations?. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 31-37). Routledge.
Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Salihoglu, S. Y., & Karatepe, C. (2023). Investigation of online news about Ukraine-Russia war: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies, (33), 1171-1186. Doi: 10.29000/rumelide.1279172
Schoen, D. E., & Smith, R. (2016). Putin’s master plan: To destroy Europe, divide NATO, and restore Russian power and global influence. Encounter Books.
Solopova, O. A., & Ilyushkina, M. Y. (2017). Russia as a target domain in American, British, and Canadian political discourse. Bulletin of the South Ural State University, Series “Linguistics”, 14(3), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.14529/ling170306
Sun, Y. (2023). The Russia-Ukraine conflict as a discursive continuum: A comparative study of Business Today and New York Times using an extended corpus-based discourse-historical approach. Journalism. Doi: 10.1177/14648849231213502
Talley, W. (2022, April 21). Debunking “DENAZIFICATION”. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe: U.S. Helsinki Commission. https://www.csce.gov/international-impact/debunking-denazification/
Timotjevic, J. (2022). The historical context in media narratives in search of peaceful resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict: a comparative study of BBC and Al Jazeera. In I. Chiluwa (Ed.), Discourse, media, and conflict: Examining war and resolution in the news (pp. 257-277). Cambridge University Press.
Voorhoof, D. (2022, May 09). EU silences Russian state media: A step in the wrong direction. Global Freedom of Expression: Columbia University. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/publications/eu-silences-russian-state-media-a-step-in-the-wrong-direction/
Watanabe, K. (2017). Measuring news bias: Russia’s official news agency ITAR-TASS’s coverage of the Ukraine crisis. European Journal of Communication, 32(3), 224-241. Doi: 10.1177/0267323117695735
Waugh, L. R., Catalano, T., Masaeed, K. A., Do, T. H., & Renigar, P. G. (2016). Critical discourse analysis: Definition, approaches, relation to pragmatics, critique, and trends. In A. Capone & J. L. Mey (Eds.), Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology: Vol. 4. Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society (pp. 71-135). Springer.
Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and critical discourse analysis. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 1-32). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1-13). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Xu, B., & Tao, Y. (2023). National identity in media discourses from Russia and Ukraine: Amid the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war. Journal of Slavic Studies, 68(3), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2023-0021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Md. Obaidullah, Hasan Shaikh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
LET (LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING) http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/index licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
