Dampak Literasi Media Berbasis Digital Terhadap Perilaku Anti Penyebaran Hoaks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v21i1.6419Keywords:
digital literacy, hoax, media literacy, social mediaAbstract
Digitalization brings benefits to the development of communication media around the world. Now communication can be done interactively and in real-time through digital media. Social media is a popular digital communication media used by teenagers to interact socially. The phenomenon that occurs is a change in behavior and activities of social media users, especially teenagers. The ease of accessing and exchanging information gives rise to the phenomenon of the spread of hoaxes. Kominfo revealed that there were 565,449 hoax content circulating through social media throughout 2021. This study aims to determine the impact of digital-based media literacy on the behavior of anti-spreading hoaxes among teenagers. This research uses quantitative and verification methods. Data was collected by distributing questionnaires to 100 respondents from SMA Negeri 2 Lembang students. Samples were taken based on purposive sampling category. Data analysis used simple linear regression with the help of SPSS software version 20.0. The results showed that there was a significant negative impact of digital-based media literacy on the behavior of anti-spreading hoaxes among adolescents with a coefficient of determination of 73.4%, while the remaining 53.8% was influenced by other variables not examined.References
Adiarsi, Gracia Rachmi, Yolanda Stellarosa, dan Martha Warta Silaban. 2015. “Literasi Media Internet Di Kalangan Mahasiswa.” Humaniora 6 (4): 470–82. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v6i4.3376.
Ainiyah, Nur. 2017. “Membangun Penguatan Budaya Literasi Media dan Informasi dalam Dunia Pendidikan.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia 2 (1): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.35316/jpii.v2i1.63.
Allcott, Hunt, dan Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. “Social media and fake news in the 2016 election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (2): 211–36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
Allen, Jennifer, Baird Howland, Markus Mobius, David Rothschild, dan Duncan J. Watts. 2020. “Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem.” Science Advances 6 (14): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3539.
Amaly, Najla, dan Armiah Armiah. 2021. “Peran Kompetensi Literasi Digital Terhadap Konten Hoaks Dalam Media Sosial.” Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 20 (2): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v20i2.6019.
Amanda, Nabila Rizki. 2020. “Social Interaction Among Adolescents Who Use Social Media” 395 (Acpch 2019): 112–17. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200120.025.
Andi Dwi Riyanto. 2021. “Hootsuite (We are Social): Indonesian Digital Report 2021.” Hootsuite (We are Social): Indonesian Digital Report 2021, 2021.
Antoci, Angelo, Fabio Sabatini, dan Mauro Sodini. 2014. “Bowling alone but tweeting together: The evolution of human interaction in the social networking era.” Quality and Quantity 48 (4): 1911–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9863-z.
Bryanov, Kirill, dan Victoria Vziatysheva. 2021. “Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news.” PLoS ONE 16 (6 June): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253717.
Dell, Marin. 2018. “Fake News, Alternative Facts, and Disinformation: The Importance of Teaching Media Literacy to Law Students.” SSRN Electronic Journal 35 (2). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3002720.
Fardiah, Dedeh, Rini Rinawati, Ferry Darmawan, Rifqi Abdul, dan Kurnia Lucky. 2020. “Media Literacy for Dissemination Anticipated Fake News on Social Media.” Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi 13 (2): 278–89. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v13i2.6624.
Giachanou, Anastasia, Bilal Ghanem, Esteban A. Ríssola, Paolo Rosso, Fabio Crestani, dan Daniel Oberski. 2022. “The impact of psycholinguistic patterns in discriminating between fake news spreaders and fact checkers.” Data and Knowledge Engineering 138 (March 2021): 101960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101960.
Ilmi, Muhammad Hafidz. 2021. “Peribahasa Urang Banjar Perspektif Islam Dalam Menangkal Hoax Dan Ujaran Kebencian Di Media Sosial.” Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 20 (2): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v20i2.5422.
Jones-Jang, S. Mo, Tara Mortensen, dan Jingjing Liu. 2021. “Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don’t.” American Behavioral Scientist 65 (2): 371–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406.
Juditha, Christiany. 2019. “Literasi Informasi Melawan Hoaks Bidang Kesehatan di Komunitas Online.” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 16 (1): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v16i1.1857.
Juliswara, Vibriza. 2017. “Mengembangkan Model Literasi Media yang Berkebhinnekaan dalam Menganalisis Informasi Berita Palsu (Hoax) di Media Sosial.” Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi 4 (2): 145.
Khan, Tanveer, Antonis Michalas, dan Adnan Akhunzada. 2021. “Fake news outbreak 2021: Can we stop the viral spread?” Journal of Network and Computer Applications 190 (April): 103112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103112.
Leaning, Marcus. 2019. “An approach to digital literacy through the integration of media and information literacy.” Media and Communication 7 (2 Critical Perspectives): 4–13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1931.
Lim, Sun Sun, dan Kai Ryn Tan. 2020. “Front liners fighting fake news: global perspectives on mobilising young people as media literacy advocates.” Journal of Children and Media 14 (4): 529–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1827817.
Mason, Lance E., Dan Krutka, dan Jeremy Stoddard. 2018. “Media Literacy, Democracy, and the Challenge of Fake News.” Journal of Media Literacy Education 10 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-2018-10-2-1.
Mukhtar, Saparuddin, dan K. Y.S. Putri. 2021. “Technology integrated on media literacy in economic studies on higher education.” Journal of Social Studies Education Research 12 (1): 95–123.
Murtiningsih, Murtiningsih. 2020. “Solusi Qurani Membangun Masyarakat Anti Hoax.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama 21 (2): 215–34. https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v21i2.7419.
Nahdiana, Nahdiana, dan Andi Adysa. 2020. “The Effect of Media Literation on Hoax News Acceptance Among Students.” https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-10-2019.2291536.
Pakpahan, Roida. 2017. “Analisis Fenomena Hoax Diberbagai Media.” Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Sosial & Teknologi (KNiST) 1 (2013): 479–84.
Pradekso, Tandiyo, Djoko Setyabudi, dan Rouli Manalu. 2018. “Digital Media Literacy Campaign in Identifying News.” E3S Web of Conferences 73: 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187314015.
Saleh, Gunawan -, dan Ribka Pitriani. 2018. “Pengaruh Media Sosial Instagram dan WhatsApp Terhadap Pembentukan Budaya ‘Alone Together.’” Jurnal Komunikasi 10 (2): 103. https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v10i2.2673.
Tandoc, Edson C., Zheng Wei Lim, dan Richard Ling. 2018. “Defining ‘Fake News’: A typology of scholarly definitions.” Digital Journalism 6 (2): 137–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143.
Veeriah, Jeyasushma. 2021. “Young Adults’ Ability To Detect Fake News and Their New Media Literacy Level in the Wake of the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Content, Community and Communication 13 (7): 372–83. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.06.21/31.
Virga, Rika Lusri, dan Nanang Andriadi. 2019. “Digital Literacy and Hoax on Social Media,” no. January 2019. https://doi.org/10.2991/aicosh-19.2019.37.
Wang, Xin, Fan Chao, Guang Yu, dan Kaihang Zhang. 2022. “Factors influencing fake news rebuttal acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the moderating effect of cognitive ability.” Computers in Human Behavior 130 (December 2021): 107174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107174.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, provided that proper attribution is given to the original creator.
