Warga Negara, bukan Kafir: Wacana Status Non-Muslim di Indonesia dalam Situs-situs NU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v20i1.12497Keywords:
Munas NU, kafir, negara bangsaAbstract
Perdebatan konsep kewarganegaraan non-Muslim di berbagai negaraberpenduduk mayoritas Muslim diwarnai ketegangan antara gagasan tradisionalkewarganegaraan berbasis agama dan konsepsi modern kewarganegaraan yangberbasis teritorial negara bangsa. Pembahasan tulisan ini tentang penggunaanistilah kafir untuk menyebut non-Muslim dalam Munas NU tahun 2019 merupakanbagian dari kajian tentang pandangan ideologi dominan kepemimpinan NU.Pandangan ini dapat ditelusuri pada situs-situs internet NU, karena biasanya NUmenyebarkan paham dan pandangannya pada situs-situs miliknya. Kajian tentangisu ini penting untuk mengetahui apakah dalam kasus ini NU masihmemperjuangkan ideologi yang toleran, mendukung demokrasi dan menentangIndonesia menjadi negara IslamReferences
Abdillah, P. D. M. (2015). Islam dan Demokrasi Respons Intelektual Muslim
Indonesia Terhadap Konsep Demokrasi 1966-1993. Prenada Media.
Afkar, T. (2000). Fiqh rakyat: Pertarungan fiqh dengan kekuasaan. LKiS.
Anjum, O. (2016a). Dhimmi Citizens: Non-Muslims in the New Islamist Discourse.
ReOrient, 2(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.2.1.0031
Anjum, O. (2016b). Salafis and Democracy: Doctrine and Context: Salafis and
Democracy: Doctrine and Context. The Muslim World, 106(3), 448–473.
https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12158
An-Naʿim, A. A. (2010). Beyond dhimmihood: Citizenship and human rights. In R.
W. Hefner (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam (pp. 314–334).
Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521844437.014
Barton, G. (2002). Abdurrahman Wahid , Muslim democrat, Indonesian
president: A view from the inside. UNSW Press.
Basit, A., & Chakim, S. (2018). The mainstreaming of Indonesian moderate Islam:
A critical discourse analysis on Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah‟ s
websites. ON ISLAM AND MUSLIM SOCIETIES (ICONIS) 2018, 320.
Batubara, H. (2016). Persoalkan 5 “Pahlawan Kafir” di Rupiah Baru, Ini
Penjelasan Dwi Estiningsih. detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-
/persoalkan-5-pahlawan-kafir-di-rupiah-baru-ini-penjelasan-dwiestiningsih
Bruinessen, M. van (Ed.). (2013). Contemporary developments in Indonesian
Islam: Explaining the “conservative turn.” Institute of Southeast Asian
Studies.
Bush, R. (2009). Nahdlatul Ulama and the struggle for power within Islam and
politics in Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Chaplin, C. (2018). Salafi Islamic piety as civic activism: Wahdah Islamiyah and
differentiated citizenship in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 208–223.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445488
Durie, M., & Bat Yeʼor. (2009). The third choice: Islam, dhimmitude and
freedom. Deror Books.
Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. Verso.
Ellis, K. C. (2018). Secular Nationalism and Citizenship in Muslim Countries:114 ZAINAL PIKRI, SYADZALI, NAJLA AMALY
Arab Christians in the Levant. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71204-8
Elson, R. E. (2009). Another look at the Jakarta Charter controversy of 1945.
Indonesia, 88, 105–130.
Fadel, M. (2016). Islamic Law and Constitution-Making: The Authoritarian
Temptation and the Arab Spring. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2711859
Fealy, G. (1998). Ulama and Politics in Indonesia: A History of Nahdlatul
Ulama, 1952–1967 [PhD Thesis]. Monash University.
Feillard, A. (1999). NU vis-à-vis Negara: Pencarian isi, bentuk dan makna. LKiS.
Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia.
Princeton University Press.
Hefner, R. W. (2019). Whatever Happened to Civil Islam? Islam and
Democratisation in Indonesia, 20 Years On. Asian Studies Review, 0(0), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1625865
Ichwan, M. N., Salim, A., & Srimulyani, E. (2020). Islam and Dormant Citizenship:
Soft Religious Ethno-Nationalism and Minorities in Aceh, Indonesia. Islam
and Christian–Muslim Relations, 1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2020.1780407
Iqbal, A. M. (2020, October 29). Challenging moderate Islam in Indonesia: NU
Garis Lurus and its construction of the “authentic” NU online. Rising Islamic
Conservatism in Indonesia; Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010920-6
Kayane, Y. (2020). Understanding Sunni-Shi’a sectarianism in contemporary
Indonesia: A different voice from Nahdlatul Ulama under pluralist leadership.
Indonesia and the Malay World, 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2020.1675277
Lansford, T. (2015). Political handbook of the World 2015. SAGE Publications,
Inc.
Martin, R. C. (2005). From Dhimmis to Minorities: Shifting Constructions of the
Non-Muslim Other from Early to Modern Islam. In M. SHATZMILLER (Ed.),
Nationalism and Minority Identities in Islamic Societies (pp. 3–21). McGillQueen’s University Press; JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt8093r.4
Menchik, J. (2019). Moderate Muslims and Democratic Breakdown in Indonesia.
Asian Studies Review, 43(3), 415–433.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1627286
Mietzner, M., & Muhtadi, B. (2018). Explaining the 2016 Islamist Mobilisation in
Indonesia: Religious Intolerance, Militant Groups and the Politics of
Accommodation. Asian Studies Review, 42(3), 479–497.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2018.1473335ALHADHARAH: JURNAL ILMU DAKWAH 115
Mietzner, M., & Muhtadi, B. (2020). The Myth of Pluralism: Nahdlatul Ulama and
the Politics of Religious Tolerance in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast
Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 42(1), 58–84.
nu.or.id. (2019, March 1). Ketum PBNU Serahkan Rekomendasi Hasil Munas
pada JK. https://www.nu.or.id/post/read/103198/ketum-pbnu-serahkanrekomendasi-hasil-munas-pada-jk
Poljarevic. (2017). The Ambiguity of Citizenship in Contemporary Salafism. In R.
Meijer & N. Butenschøn (Eds.), The Crisis of Citizenship in the Arab World.
BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004340985_015
Rabasa, A. M. (2003). Chapter 2: Indonesia: the Jihad project. The Adelphi
Papers, 43(358), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/714027891
Rabo, A. (2012). ‘We are Christians and we are equal citizens’: Perspectives on
particularity and pluralism in contemporary Syria. Islam and Christian–
Muslim Relations, 23(1), 79–93.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2011.634598
Republika. (2016, September 4). Puluhan Ribu Massa Dukung Pemimpin
Muslim. Republika Online.
https://republika.co.id/berita/nasional/jabodetabeknasional/16/09/04/ocz5uy282-puluhan-ribu-massa-dukung-pemimpinmuslim
Saeed, A. (1999). Rethinking citizenship rights of non‐Muslims in an Islamic
state: Rashid al‐Ghannūshi’s contribution to the evolving debate. Islam and
Christian–Muslim Relations, 10(3), 307–323.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09596419908721189
Scott, R. M. (2007). Contextual Citizenship in Modern Islamic Thought. Islam and
Christian–Muslim Relations, 18(1), 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410601070990
Stepan, A., & Menchik, J. (2010). Islam in Indonesia: Democratisation from
Below - Qantara.de. Qantara.de - Dialogue with the Islamic World.
https://en.qantara.de/content/islam-in-indonesia-democratisation-frombelow
Suryawan, I. N. (2010). Genealogi kekerasan dan pergolakan subaltern: Bara di
Bali Utara (Cet. 1). Prenada.
Tempo. (1998, October 27). Wawancara Prof. Dr. Ahmad Muflih Saefuddin:
Tempo. https://majalah.tempo.co/read/nasional/96673/wawancara-prof-drahmad-muflih-saefuddin
Tempo.co. (2016, December 22). Sebut 5 Pahlawan Kafir, Dwi: Jangan Ajari
Saya Toleransi. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/829857/sebut-5-
pahlawan-kafir-dwi-jangan-ajari-saya-toleransi
Wahid, A. (2010). Gus Dur menjawab perubahan zaman: Warisan pemikiran116 ZAINAL PIKRI, SYADZALI, NAJLA AMALY
K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid. Harian Kompas.
Wichelen, S. van. (2010). Religion, politics and gender in Indonesia: Disputing
the Muslim body. Routledge.
Widiastuti, R. (2019, March 1). NU Usul Sebutan Kafir ke Nonmuslim Indonesia
Dihapus. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1180643/nu-usul-sebutankafir-ke-nonmuslim-indonesia-dihapus
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Zainal Pikri, Ahmad Syadzali, Najla Amaly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, provided that proper attribution is given to the original creator.
