PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN STRATEGI LARI KANAN KIRI BENAR SALAH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INGGRIS KELAS IV DI MIN PEMURUS DALAM BANJARMASIN

Authors

  • Raihanatul Jannah UIN Antasari
  • Syarifah Salmah UIN Antasari
  • Barkah Alida Yahya Alumni UIN Antasari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v7i1.2022

Keywords:

Left-right run and true-false strategy, Learning Outcome, English Learning

Abstract

Left-right run and true-false strategy is the activity hearing a true statement then run to the right and when hearing a false statement then run to the left. The learning outcome is the ability the student receives after learning activities. The english language learning  was about my body's material for IV  grade. This research aims to know the result of student learning by using Left-right run and true-false strategy on learning English and to know if there is a significant influence to student learning outcome by using Left-right run and true-false strategy. This research is field research by using experimental method. The sample in this research is the fourth graders of MIN Managers in Banjarmasin. IV  grade students A are as experimental classes (using Left-right run and true-false strategy) and fourth-grade students B are as control class (using index card match strategy). The material taught is my body material. The result of the research shows that the use of Left-right run and true-false strategy can improve the students' learning outcomes in fourth grade English learning at MIN Pemurus Dalam in Banjarmasin. It is based on the analysis of student learning outcomes of experimental and control class. Experimental results of experimental class students are better than the results of the control class students. This can be seen from the average value of the experimental group students at 87.82 whereas the average grade of the control class students is 64.09. Based on average posttest results, the difference is 23.73. Left-right run and true-false strategy has a significant effect on student learning outcomes in fourth grade English learning at MIN Pemurus Dalam in Banjarmasin. This is based on a different test that states Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted.

References

Aqib, Zainal, Profesionalisme Guru dalam pembelajaran, Surabaya, Cendekia, 2002.

Arikunto, Suharsimi, Prosedur Penelitian suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta, PT Rineka Cipta, 2006.

, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2002.

_________, Mananjemen Penelitian, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2003.

Ash-Shabuni, Syaikh Muhammad Ali, Shafwatut Tafasir, diterjemahkan oleh KH. Yasin Tirmidli, Lc, Tafsir-Tafsir Pilihan (Jilid 5),Jakarta, Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2011.

Azwar, Saifuddin, Metode Penelitian, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.

Dave, Vale, Teaching Children English, Cambridge, CUP, 1995.

Departemen Pendidikan Kebudayaan RI, kamus besar bahasa indonesia, Jakarta, Balai Pustaka,2001.

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri, Psikologi Belajar, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2002.

, Guru dan anak didik, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2010.

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri dan Aswan Zain, Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2002.

Hamalik, Oemar, Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta, Bumi Aksara, 1995.

Jayadi, Ahmad dan Abdul Majid, Tadzkirah Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) Berdasarkan pendekatan Kontekstual, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

Kebijakan Depdikbud RI No. 0478/4/1992, Bab VIII.

Khaeruddin, ilmu pendidikan Islam, Makassar, Yayasan Fabiah, 2002.

Maestro. Buku Pengayaan Bahasa Inggris Untuk SD/MI Kelas IV, Kartasura, Hasan Pratama,2015.

Muhaimin, dkk, Pengembangan Model Kurikulum KTSP pada Sekolah dan Madrasah, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

Murdan, Statistik Pendidikan dan Aplikasinya, Banjarmasin, Cyprus, 2005.

Nazir, Metode Penelitian, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia, 1999.

Prasetyo, Bambang dan Lina Miftahul Jannah, Metode Kuantitatif (Teori dan Aplikasi), Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.

Rusman, Model-Model Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2013.

Sabri, Ahmad, Strategi Belajar Mengajar Micro Teaching, Jakarta, Quantum Teaching, 2005.

Said, Alamsyah, dan Andi Budimanjaya, 95 Strategi Mengajar Multiple Intelligences, Jakarta, Prenamedia Group, 2015.

Sanjaya, Wina, Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.

Shihab, M. Quraish, Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an Volume 6, Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

Slameto, Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 1995.

Sudjana, Nana, Metode Statistika, Bandung, Tarsito, 2002.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Bandung, Alfabeta, 2013.

Sudirman, dkk, Ilmu Pendidikan, Bandung, Remaja Rosda Karya, 1992.

Suprijono, Agus, cooperative Learning, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar,2011.

Trianto, Panduan Lengkap Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Jakarta, Prestasi Pustakarya, 2011.

Undang-undang RI No. 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen Serta Undang-undang RI No. 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang SISDIKNAS, Bandung, Citra Umbara, 2006.

Usman, Moh uzer Menjadi Guru Profesional, Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya, 2006.

http://rahayugita.blogspot.com/2012/03/prinsip-prinsip-pembelajaran-bahasa.html.diakses 5 oktober 2016.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-15

How to Cite

Jannah, R., Salmah, S., & Yahya, B. A. (2017). PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN STRATEGI LARI KANAN KIRI BENAR SALAH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INGGRIS KELAS IV DI MIN PEMURUS DALAM BANJARMASIN. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v7i1.2022

Issue

Section

Articles