INTERPERSONAL MEANINGS OF MODALITY IN JACINDA ARDERN’S SPEECHES ON COVID-19

Evelina Ayu Kristianti

Abstract


Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is a theory which analyses the language function to understand the meanings and purposes of language in written text or speech. In this research, SFL is employed to discover the interpersonal meanings on Jacinda Ardern’s speeches on COVID-19, seen from the modality since it is one of the most important elements in SFL which shows the speaker’s attitudes. This research uses Jacinda Ardern’s speeches on 20 April 2020 and 15 July 2020. Halliday’s modal category is used as the theoretical framework; thus, the interpretation will derive from his theory. This research also employs discourse analysis as the approach in order to understand the relation between language elements and social context in meaning-making. This study had different implementation of modal category from what Halliday had proposed which is triggered by the social situation during pandemic in New Zealand. This research discovers that the first speech only uses two types of modality which are probability and obligation, meanwhile the second speech uses all types of modality. The difference between the first and the second speech is due to the different circumstances. However, in general, the interpersonal meanings represented from the modality in the speeches are the commitment, empathy, dan quick respond of the speaker.

 

Keywords- interpersonal meanings, modality, speech, Jacinda Ardern’s speech, COVID-19


Keywords


linguistics; systemic functional linguistics; interpersonal meaning; modality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brewer, N. M. (1987). Modality and facivity: One perspective on the meaning of the English modal auxiliaries (Phd, University of Leeds). University of Leeds. Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/472/

Chen, D., & Shuo, Z. (2018). Analysis of Interpersonal Function in Speech—A Case Study in Obama’s WHCD Address. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 6(8). Retrieved from https://ijlass.org/vol-6-no-8-october-2018/

Covid 19 coronavirus: New Zealand ranked second-safest country, after Germany. (2020, September 4). NZ Herald. Retrieved from https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12362452

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (Fourth Edition). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Litosseliti, L. (Ed.). (2010). Research methods in linguistics. London; New York: Continuum.

Next steps in COVID response. (2020, July 15). Retrieved September 23, 2020, from Beehive.govt.nz website: http://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/next-steps-covid-response

Olaniyan, K. K., & Adeniji, A. (2015). Modality in Statement of Objectives in Arts-Based Research Article Abstracts. British Journal of English Linguistics, 3(1), 42–51.

Pionery, H., & Isti’anah, A. (2017). Modality Analysis in Melania Trump’s and Ivanka Trump’s Campaign Speeches in Republican National Convention, July 19th, 2016. Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.2017.170104

Prime Minister’s remarks on COVID-19 alert level decision – April 20. (2020, April 20). Retrieved September 23, 2020, from Beehive.govt.nz website: http://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/prime-minister%E2%80%99s-remarks-covid-19-alert-level-decision-%E2%80%93-april-20

Rui, Z., & Jingxia, L. (2018). The Study on the Interpersonal Meanings of Modality in Micro-blogging English News Discourse by the case of “Donald Trump’s Muslim Entry Ban.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.2p.110

Sadia, S., & Ghani, M. (2018). Modality in Editorials of Pakistani English Newspapers: A Corpus Based Study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p144

Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar (Third edition). London: New York : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L., & Schönthal, D. (Eds.). (2019). The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Webster, J. J. (2019). Key Terms in the SFL Model. In G. Thompson, W. L. Bowcher, & L. Fontaine (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 35–54; By D. Schönthal). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.004

Young, L., & Harrison, C. (Eds.). (2004). Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Studies in social change. London ; New York: Continuum.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/let.v10i2.3995

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Evelina Ayu Kristianti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Printed ISSN : 2086-9606 | Online ISSN  : 2549-2454

  

 

LET Journal Indexed by:

Creative Commons License
LET (LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING) http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/index licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.