STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT INCLUSION CLASSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v9i1.3077Keywords:
Writing, Recount text, Students’ DifficultiesAbstract
Writing skill is already taught in school and colleges. The students of Junior High School should retells something that already happened (Recount text). The objective of the study is to identify the students’ difficulties in writing recount text in inclusion classes. The study belongs to a mixed-method research involving 30 students of 8th grade inclusion class. The data collecting techniques was testing. There were several steps to analyze the data: analyzing the students’ work, calculating the average score by using descriptive statistic and the last step is descriptive analysis. The result of the study shows that the students’ difficulties in writing recount text are related to content aspect, organization aspect, grammar aspect, mechanic aspect and generic structure of recount text aspect especially in orientation and reorientation.References
Abiri, J.O.O. 2006. Elements of Evaluation Measurement and Statistical Techniques in Education. Ilorin: Library Publications Committee, University of Ilorin.
Al-Mekhafi, M. Abdu. 2011. The Relationship between Writing Self-efficacy Beliefs and Final Examination Scores in a Writing Course among a Group of Arab EFL Trainee-teachers. International Journal for Research in Education (IJRE), Vol 29, 17-33.
Anderson, Mark & Anderson, Katy. 2003. Text Types in English 2. South Yarra: Macmillan Education Australia.
Arikunto, Suharsimi 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Asmervik, S., Ogden, T., & Rygvold, A. 1999. Barn med behov av sarskilt stod. Lund: Lund Student Literature.
Bachman, L.F. 1990. What does Language Testing have to Offer?. TESOL Quarterly.
Brown, Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. 2nd Edition. New York: Pearson Education Longman.
Browne, Ann. 1999. Teaching Writing at Key Stage 1 and Before. Bolton: Stanley Thornes.
Cresswell, J.C. 2012. Education Research, Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 4th Edition. Boston: Pearson.
Ericson, B. 1999. Reading and Writing Difficulties- A Problem?. EMIR Education and Research No.2
Fraenkel, J.R and Wallen, N.E. 2006. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Gerot, L and Wignell, P. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: An Introductory Workbook.
Graham, S. & Perlin, D. 2007. Writing Next-Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. The Elementary School Journal, 94 (2), 169-181. Vol. 4(2): 1,2016.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to Teach Writing. London: Pearson Education Limited.
______________. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching (Third Edition). London: Pearson Education Ltd.
Knapp, Peter & Watkins, Megan. 2005. Genres, Text, Grammar. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Koutsoftas , A-D & Gray, S. 2012. Comparison of Narrative and Expository Writing in Students With and Without Language Learning Difficulties. LSHSS
Lancashire Country Council. 2008. Primary Framework Support for Writing, Non-Fiction. Lancashire Country Council.
Leo. 2007. English for Academic Purpose: Essay Writing. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset.
Lorch, Sue. 1984. Basic Writing a Practical Approach. Toronto: Little Brown and Company.
Nafisah N and Kurniawan E. 2007. Writing English for General Communication. Bandung: UPI PRESS.
Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. 2007. Introduction to Academic Writing. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Prasetyo Bambang., Lina M.J. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Saragih N S & Pardede H. 2014. The Effectiveness of Using Recount Text to Improve Writing Skill For Grade III Students of Kalam Kudus Elementary School 2 Pematangsiantar. IOSR Journal: Vol 19. PP 56-64.
Seliger, H.W and Shohamy, E. 1989. Second Language Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfa Beta.
Underhill, Christina M. 2006. The Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs in Corporate Setting: A Meta- Analytical Review of the Literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, v68 n2 p292-307.
Weigle, S.C. 2002. Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
LET (LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING) http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/index licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.