THINKING MAPS - AN EFFECTIVE VISUAL STRATEGY EFL/ESL FOR LEARNERS IN 21ST CENTURY LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v8i1.2193Keywords:
Thinking Maps, ELT, 21st Century LearningAbstract
In this 21st Century learning students are encouraged to master skills that can enhance their professional in their lives. The traditional method to teach English now is suggested to be integrated with the standard modern method to Enhance higher order thinking skill. Thinking Maps is a language of eight visual patterns, each based on a fundamental thought process, designed by Dr. David N. Hyerle. Looking at to the demands in teaching English, educators need to consider Thinking Maps to their English instruction. The goals of this strategy are to help teacher having a variety of technique in teaching English and to cover the demand of 21st century learning in Enhance students’ thinking skill. Aware towards a potential of this teaching strategy, Thinking Maps could be one consideration for teacher to practice in the classroom. This paper will elaborate on how the Thinking maps implement can give the contributions in teaching and learning English. The discussion will be in the introduction of Thinking Maps, the concept of Thinking Maps in English language teaching. Furthermore, the application of Thinking Maps into real instructional context will be elaborated.References
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
Carneiro, R. 2007. The big picture: understanding learning and meta-learning challenges. European Journal of Education, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 151-172.
Cooks, J., & Sunseri, A. (2014). Leveling the Playing Field: The Efficacy of Thinking Maps on English Language Learner Students' Writing. CATESOL Journal, 25(1), 24-40
Costa, A. (2001). Developing minds. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
DeLorenzo, E. (2011). Brain compatible instructional strategies with Thinking Maps. Classroom Storytelling with Thinking Maps. Retrieved from http://eileendelorenzo.com/brain-compatible-instructional-strategies-with-thinking-maps/
Fan, Y. S. (2016). Thinking Maps in Writing Project in English for Taiwanese Elementary School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 36-57.
Gallagher, M. L. 2011. Using Thinking Maps to Facilitate Research Writing in Upper Level Undergraduate Classes. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 29(2), 53-56.
Greenhill, V. (2010). 21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Educator Preparation. Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
Hickie, K. (2006). An examination of student performance after two years of thinking maps® implementation in three Tennessee schools (Doctoral Dissertation, East Tennessee State University).
Retrievedfrom http://www.thinkingfoundation.org/research/literacy/literacy_read_comp.html
Himmele, P., & Himmele, W. (2017). Total participation techniques: Making every student an active learner. ASCD.
Huitt, W. (2009). Constructivism. Educational Psychology Interactive. Retrieved from http://teach.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/construct.html.
Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual tools for constructing knowledge. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hyerle, D. (2007). Florance McEachern. ed (in English). A Language for Learning. North Carolina: Thinking Maps Inc.
Hyerle, D. (2009). Visual tools for transforming information into knowledge. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Hyerle, D. (2011). Student successes with thinking maps. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hyerle, D., Alper, L., && Wolfie, P. (2011). Students’ Success with Thinking Maps: School-based Research, Results, and Models for Achievement Using Visual Tools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Idek, S. (2015). Thinking maps as a tool in developing oracy in English language learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
Kumari, S. & Kumari, S. (2013). Effect of Six Thinking Hats Strategy on Development of Parallel Thinking in High School Students. Indian Journal of Research, 2 (11), 56-59.
Learnovation. 2009. Inspiring Young People to Become Lifelong Learners in 2025. Vision Paper 1. Brussels, MENON, pp. 1-12. www.menon.org.gr/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ Learnovation-Vision-Paper-1_Learning-at-School-Ages1.pdf
Long, D., & Carlson, D. (2011). Mind the map: How thinking maps affect student achievement. Networks, 13(2), 1-7.
Maharani, A. A. P. (2017). Double Bubble Map: The Attempt To Enhance The Students’skill In Writing A Comparison And Contrast Paragraph. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan (Jsp), 7(1).
McLoughlin, C. and Lee, M.J.W. 2008. The three p’s of pedagogy for the networked society: personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 10-27.
Murbiyani, A. (2015). The Use Of Thinking Maps To Improve The Writing Skill Of Grade Viii Students At Smpn 2 Srandakan In The Academic Year Of 2014/2015 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta).
Omar, A., & Albakri, I. S. M. A. (2016). Thinking Maps to Promote Critical Thinking through the Teaching of Literature in the ESL Context. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 1(1).
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). Critical thinking concepts and tools (5th ed.). Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Pacific Policy Research Center. (2010). Twenty first century skills for students and teachers. Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Research & Evaluation Division.
Piaget, J. (1981) Theory of stages in cognitive development. In Gallager, J. M. & Reid, D. K. (Eds.), The learning theory of Piaget and Inhelder. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Redecker, C. and Punie, Y. 2013. The future of learning 2025: developing a vision for change. Future Learning, Vol. 1, pp. 3-17.
Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century. Education research and foresight working papers. Paris: UNESCO.
Webb, N. L. (1997). Determining Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education. NISE Brief, 1(2), n2.
Weis, L. A. (2011). The Effect of Thinking Maps on Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. California State University, Northridge (California), United States of America.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
LET (LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING) http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/index licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.