The Case of Fuck in American Ted Talks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v16i1.20317Keywords:
fuck, swearword, taboo referents, gender-based, American Ted talksAbstract
Swearing is part of everyday interaction. Such swear words as fuck, suck, cunt, tits, cocksucker are used more often in informal situations for a number of purposes. This study aims to explore how the American Ted talkers use fuck in their talk. The data were constructed from the Ted Corpus Search Engine. The corpus of male talk consisted of 45,037 words whereas the corpus of female talk contained 18,852 words. The raw frequency of morphological variants of fuck was counted using Concordance tool in AntConc 3.3.4. The raw frequency of the morphological variants of fuck generated from the Concordance tool was then put into SPSS software to calculate Log-likelihood scores and significance level. The results showed no statistically significant difference in the use of fuck in male and female talk. The results indicated that using fuck in male talk can show surprise, promote in-group membership, and exaggerate the problem to create humor. Fuck and fucking in female talk were integrated with other expletives such as whore, shit, and slut to bring humorous effects to the audience. The current findings underscore the importance of helping second language learners understand how such language functions in digital discourse.
References
Abdelaal, N. M., & Sarhani, A. (2021). Subtitling strategies of swear words and taboo expressions in the movie “Training Day”. Heliyon, 7, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07351
Allard, A., & Holmstrom, A. J. (2023). Students’ perception of an instructor: The effects of instructor accommodation to student swearing. Language Sciences, 99, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101562
Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.3.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
Baruch, Y., Prouska, R., Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Bunk, J. (2017). Swearing at work: The mixed outcomes of profanity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(2), 149 -162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2016-0102
Debray, C. (2023). Swearing, identity and power in professional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 215, 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.07.002
Doherty, C., Berwick, A., & McGregor, R. (2018). Swearing in class: Institutional morality in dispute. Linguistic and Education, 48, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.09.003
Downes, L., Kettle, M., O’Brien, P., & Tait, G. (2021). Responsibilisation and acceptable verbal behaviour in schools: Teachers and leaders arbitrating the boundaries of swearing. Linguistics and Education, 61, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100898
Dynel, M. (2023). Hashtag swearing: Pragmatic polysemy and polyfunctionality of #FuckPutin as solidary flaming. Journal of Pragmatics, 209, 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.03.005
Fägersten, K. B. (2017). The role of swearing in creating an online persona: The case of YouTuber PewDiePie. Discourse, Context and Media, 18, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.04.002
Fägersten, K. B., & Stapleton, K. (2023). Everybody swears on Only Murders in the Building: The interpersonal functions of scripted television swearing. Journal of Pragmatics, 216, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.08.006
Guillot, M. (2023). Doing swearing across languages: The curious case of Subtitling. Journal of Pragmatics, 215, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.07.003
Jay, T. (2009). The utility and ubiquity of taboo words. Perspectives on Psychological science, 4, 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.011
Kaya, T., & Bicen, H. (2016). The effects of social media on students’ behaviors: Facebook as a case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 374-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.036
Ljung, M. (1986). Trends in teenage talk: Corpus compilation, analysis and findings. Retrieved from www.ebrary.com. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.8
Love, R., & Stenstrom, A. (2023). Corpus-pragmatic perspectives on the contemporary weakening of fuck: The case of teenage British English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 216, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.08.008
McEnery, A., & Xiao, Z. (2004). Swearing in modern British English: The case of fuck in the BNC. Language and Literature, 13, 235-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947004044
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Pavesi, M., & Formentelli, M. (2023). The pragmatic dimensions of swearing in films: Searching for coherence in dubbing strategies. Journal of Pragmatics, 217, 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.09.003
Prawinanto, A., Prasetyo, H., & Bram, B. (2020). Swearing and its motives in the Antologi Rasa novel. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 10(1), 40-65. https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v10i1.3593
Smith, J., & Adendorff, R. (2021). Reading parents: Parody and paradox in Go the Fuck to Sleep. Language and Communication, 77, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.12.004
Stapleton, K., & Fäagersten, K. B. (2023). Editorial: Swearing and interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 218, 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.10.009
Trudgill, P., & Anderson, L. (1992). Bad Language. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Limited.
Twenge, J., VanLandingham, H., & Campell, K. (2017). The seven words you can never say on television: Increases in the use of swear words in American books. Sage Open, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017723
Virginia, F., & Mubarak, Z. H. (2022). Pragmatic analysis of Searle’s directive acts types in “Get out movie”. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 12(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v12i2.7366
Wang, N. (2013). An analysis of the pragmatic functions of swearing. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 6, 71-79.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Thu Lau

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
LET (LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING) http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/index licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




