IDENTITAS AGAMA, RUANG PUBLIK DAN POST-SEKULARISME: PERSPEKTIF DISKURSUS JURGEN HABERMAS

Authors

  • Irfan Noor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v11i1.733

Keywords:

identitas agama, diskursus, postsekularisme, ruang publik

Abstract

The politic of identity based on religion is still a major issue of Indonesian nationality.One such issue is the validity of a religious groups involvement in the national publicpolicy in Indonesia.In this context, the theory of Jurgen Habermass discourse and itsrelation to his view of post-secularism was very relevant to discuss. For Habermas, theneutrality of the public sphere does not mean that a vacuum of religion. In the name ofdemocracy, religious positions should be placed in parallel with the formation of otherpolitical opinions and aspirations. Functional differentiation in modern society leadingto the individualization of religion does not necessarily imply loss of influence andrelevance of religion in the public sphere. Nevertheless, of course, the involvement ofreligion in the public sphere still has limits, that the religious language of particularreligion must be translated into the language first that being accepted by the public,which has epistemic status that can be accepted by the other residents. Such alignmentis called postsekular people, where every citizen has the right faith with the bond ofcommunication with each other.

References

dalam Teori Diskursus Jurgen Habermas, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2009).

George Ritzer, Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots, (Boston:

The Basics, McGraw Hill, 2003).

Giancarlo Bosetti (ed.), Iman Melawan Nalar: Perdebatan Joseph Ratzinger

Jamhari dan Jajang Jahroni, Gerakan Salafi Radikal di Indonesia, (Jakarta:

Rajawali Press, 2004).

K. Hadden dan Anson Shupe (eds.), Religion and Political Order vol.

III: Secularization and Fundamentalism Reconsidered, (New York: Paragon

House, 1989).

David Scott dau Charles Hirsehkind (eds.). Powers of the Secular Modern:

Talal Asad and His Interlocutors, Stanford, (California: Stanford

University Press, 2006).

Jurgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry

into a Category qf Bourgeois Society, (Cambridge MIT Prees, 1991)

of Society, T. McCarthy (trans.). (Boston: Beacon, 1984).

McCarthy (trans.). (Boston: Beacon, 1987).

Democracy, W. Rehg (trans.). (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).

Jurgen Habermas dan Joseph Ratzinger, The Dialectics of Secularization: On

Reason and Religion, disunting oleh Florian Schuller, (San Francisco:

Ignatius Press, 2006).

Michael J. Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, (Cambridge University

Press 1982).

Paul Budi Kleden dan Adrianus Sunarko (eds.), Dialektika Sekularisasi:

dan Ledalero, 2010).

Downloads

Published

2016-03-07