IDENTITAS AGAMA, RUANG PUBLIK DAN POST-SEKULARISME: PERSPEKTIF DISKURSUS JURGEN HABERMAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v11i1.733Keywords:
identitas agama, diskursus, postsekularisme, ruang publikAbstract
The politic of identity based on religion is still a major issue of Indonesian nationality.One such issue is the validity of a religious groups involvement in the national publicpolicy in Indonesia.In this context, the theory of Jurgen Habermass discourse and itsrelation to his view of post-secularism was very relevant to discuss. For Habermas, theneutrality of the public sphere does not mean that a vacuum of religion. In the name ofdemocracy, religious positions should be placed in parallel with the formation of otherpolitical opinions and aspirations. Functional differentiation in modern society leadingto the individualization of religion does not necessarily imply loss of influence andrelevance of religion in the public sphere. Nevertheless, of course, the involvement ofreligion in the public sphere still has limits, that the religious language of particularreligion must be translated into the language first that being accepted by the public,which has epistemic status that can be accepted by the other residents. Such alignmentis called postsekular people, where every citizen has the right faith with the bond ofcommunication with each other.References
dalam Teori Diskursus Jurgen Habermas, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2009).
George Ritzer, Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots, (Boston:
The Basics, McGraw Hill, 2003).
Giancarlo Bosetti (ed.), Iman Melawan Nalar: Perdebatan Joseph Ratzinger
Jamhari dan Jajang Jahroni, Gerakan Salafi Radikal di Indonesia, (Jakarta:
Rajawali Press, 2004).
K. Hadden dan Anson Shupe (eds.), Religion and Political Order vol.
III: Secularization and Fundamentalism Reconsidered, (New York: Paragon
House, 1989).
David Scott dau Charles Hirsehkind (eds.). Powers of the Secular Modern:
Talal Asad and His Interlocutors, Stanford, (California: Stanford
University Press, 2006).
Jurgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry
into a Category qf Bourgeois Society, (Cambridge MIT Prees, 1991)
of Society, T. McCarthy (trans.). (Boston: Beacon, 1984).
McCarthy (trans.). (Boston: Beacon, 1987).
Democracy, W. Rehg (trans.). (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).
Jurgen Habermas dan Joseph Ratzinger, The Dialectics of Secularization: On
Reason and Religion, disunting oleh Florian Schuller, (San Francisco:
Ignatius Press, 2006).
Michael J. Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, (Cambridge University
Press 1982).
Paul Budi Kleden dan Adrianus Sunarko (eds.), Dialektika Sekularisasi:
dan Ledalero, 2010).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).