Facing World Religion Paradigm: Challenges Of Dayak Kaharingan During New Order Era Into Reforms

Authors

  • Muhammad Sandi Rosyadi UIN Antasari Bnajarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v21i2.7316

Keywords:

Ilmu Ushuluddin, Religious studies, Comparative Religion

Abstract

Belief, as part of human life, is part of the fundamental rights. However, the increasing number and variety of existing beliefs impact the emergence of standardized beliefs that deserve to be categorized as religion. This paper discusses how one of the original beliefs of the people of Kalimantan, namely kaharingan, cannot be considered a religion because various religious standards hamper it. This paper finds that standardization which begins with the notion of religion, according to EB Taylor, has an impact on a belief that must meet several conditions, such as belief in God, holy scriptures, carriers of religion or prophets, and others. The standardization impacts Kaharingan as a belief that can only be said as a "aliran kepercayaan," not a religion in Indonesia. The rise and fall of the relationship between local religion and the state that occurred during the New Order era and reforms were more or less influenced by this paradigm.

References

Abdillah, Arafat Noor, and Syafira Anisatul Izah. “Dinamika Hubungan Antara Agama Lokal, Agama Resmi, Dan Negara.” Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam 7, No. 1, December 20, 2022.

Baier, Martin. “The Development of the Hindu Kaharingan Religion: A New Dayak Religion in Central Kalimantan.” Anthropos, no. H. 2, 2007.

Bell, Catherine. “Paradigms behind (and before) the Modern Concept of Religion.” History and Theory 45, no. 4, 2006.

D. Barger, Stephanie. “James L. Cox. 2007. From Primitive to Indigenous: The Academic Study of Indigenous Religions. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, Pp. 171, ISBN 9780754655695, Hb,pounds 50.00.” Edinburgh University Press 22 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LF UK, 2009.

Etika, Tiwi, and Anne Schiller. “Kaharingan or Hindu Kaharingan: What’s in a Name in Indonesian Borneo?” Nova Religio 25, no. 4, 2022.

Gellner, David N. “Religion, Politics, and Ritual. Remarks on Geertz and Bloch.” Social Anthropology 7, no. 2, 1999.

Indrawardana, Ira. “Berketuhanan Dalam Perspektif Kepercayaan Sunda Wiwitan.” MELINTAS 30, no. 1 (April 1, 2014): 105–18. https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v30i1.1284.105-118.

Kustini. “Peranan Forum Kerukunan Umat Beragama Dalam Pelaksanaan Pasal 8, 9, Dan 10 Peraturan Bersama Menteri Agama Dan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 9 Dan 8 Tahun 2006 / Editor, Kustini | OPAC Perpustakaan Nasional RI.” Accessed December 30, 2022. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=726991.

Ma’arif, Samsul. Pasang Surut Rekognisi Agama Leluhur Dalam Politik Agama Di Indonesia. CRCS UGM Yogyakarta, 2017.

Masuzawa, Tomoko. The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. University of Chicago Press, 2005.

Moeliono, Irmayanti. Prosiding International Conference on Indonesian Studies: Ethnicity and Globalization. Vol. 1. Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya, Universitas Indonesia, 2013.

Nazmi, Aulia, Fatimah Fatimah, and Suroto Suroto. “Upaya Suku Dayak Dalam Memperjuangkan Kaharingan Menjadi Salah Satu Agama Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 8, no. 2 (2018): 250–56. https://doi.org/10.20527/kewarganegaraan.v8i2.10624.

Pals, Daniel L. “Introducing Religion: Readings from the Classic Theorists,” 2009.

Petebang, Edi. “Dayak Sakti, Ngayau, Tariu, Mangkok Merah.” Pontianak: Institut of Dayakology Research and Development, 1999.

Ramli, Yusri Mohamad. “Agama Dalam Tentukur Antropologi Simbolik Clifford Geertz.” International Journal of Islamic Thought (IJIT) 1 (2012): 62–73.

Riwut, Tjilik, and R. Nila. “Kalimantan Membangun: Alam Dan Kebudayaan. Sleman.” NR publishing, 2007.

Weinstock, Joseph A. “Kaharingan: Life and Death in Southern Borneo.” Indonesian Religions in Transition, 1987.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30