METODOLOGI KRITIK MATAN HADIS MENURUT AL-ADLABIDARI TEORI KE APLIKASI

Authors

  • Hairul Hudaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v13i1.701

Keywords:

matan sahih, syaz, �illah,

Abstract

The validity of hadith is not only seen from the sanad aspect, but also from matan. Hadith scholars set two criteria forthe validity of the matan, both are avoid syaz and illah. Disability element of matan at syaz lies in the contention ofthe matan. The illah aspect of matan was because of the additional editorial matan when compared with other. Al-Adlabi formulated the criteria of the validity of matan based on four things namely; 1). It is not contradicting with theKoran; 2). It is not contrary with the valid hadith and sirah nabawiyah; 3). It is not contrary to reason, sense andhistory; and 4). It is similar with the prophetic word. If the formula of al-Adlabis matan criticism is seen in aspectsof syaz and illah, then it appears that his offering is only covers one aspect of the syaz of matan criticism. While thecriteria of illah have not been accommodated in the rule.

References

Daftar Pustaka

Ahmad Amin, (1974). Dhuha al-Islam, Kairo, Maktabah al-Nahdhah al-Mishriyyah.

Arifuddin Ahmad, (2005). Paradigma Baru Memahami Hadis Nabi: Refleksi Pemikiran Pembaruan Prof.

Dr. Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail, Jakarta, MSCC.

Bustamin dan M. Isa H.A. Salam, (2004). Metodologi Kritik Hadis, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.

Hasjim Abbas, (2004). Kritik Matan Hadis versi Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha, Yogyakarta, Teras.

Mahmud al-Thahhan, (tth). Taysir Mushthalah al-Hadits, Beirut, Dar al-Fikr.

Muhammad Hasbi ash-Shiddieqy, (1997). Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadis, Semarang, Pustaka Rizki

Putra.

M. Syuhudi Ismail, (1992). Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi, Jakarta, Bulan Bintang.

Dar al-Afaq al-Jadid.

al-Suyuthiy, (1988). Tadrib al-Rawi fi Syarh Taqib al-Nawawi, Juz I, Beirut, Dar al-Fikr.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-07