PEMIKIRAN METODOLOGIS A. MUKTI ALI TENTANG PENELITIAN AGAMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v14i2.695Keywords:
Metode Ilmiah, Penelitian, Agama, Scientific-cum-DoctrinaireAbstract
In Indonesia, it will be said that A.Mukti Ali is a pioneer in introducing religious studies. A.Mukti Ali realized that
religious studies did not only need the scientific methods but they must also integrate with social approaches. He thought
religious studies should be conducted objectively without involving the apologists-polemical element as a basic concept. In
fact, the use of the scientific method, social sciences, and objective attitude do not be certainly enough to understand
religious phenomenon, despite religious reflection must be involved and researchers must give their views too. All components
must be synthesized in order to produce a holistic and integral assessment of religious phenomenon. The integrated
components that needed in studying religious phenomenon is what be called by Mukti Ali as a scientific approach-cumdoctrinaire.
This writing will discussed about A.Mukti Ali’s thoughts in the field of religious studies.
References
Abdullah, M. Amin. Studi Agama: Historisitas atau Normativitas? Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 1996.
Ali, A. Mukti. Ilmu Perbandingan Agama: Sebuah Pembahasan tentang Metodos dan Sistema. Yogyakarta: PT
al-Falah. 1975.
———. Ilmu Perbandingan Agama di Indonesia. Bandung: Mizan. 1996.
———. “Penelitian Agama di Indonesia” dalam Mulyanto Sumardi (ed.). Penelitian Agama Masalah
dan Pemikiran. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan. 1982.
———. “Metodologi Ilmu Agama Islam” dalam Abdullah, Taufik dan Rusli Karim (ed.). Metodologi
Penelitian Agama Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana Yogya. 1991.
———. “Penelitian Agama (Suatu Pembahasan tentang Metode dan Sistem)” dalam A. Makmur
Makka (ed.), 70 Tahun B.J. Habibie. Jakarta: Pustaka CIDESINDO. 1996
Basuki, A. Singgih. Pemikiran Keagamaan A. Mukti Ali.Yogyakarta: Suka Press. 2013.
Damami, Muhammad, dkk. “Prof. Dr. H. A. Mukti Ali, M.A.” dalam Lima Tokoh IAIN Sunan Kalijaga
Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Suka Press. 2000.
Daya, Burhanuddin dan Herman Leonard Beck (ed). Ilmu Perbandingan Agama di Indonesia dan Belanda.
Jakarta: INIS. 1992.
Djam’annuri (ed.). 70 Tahun H. A. Mukti Ali: Agama dan Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: IAIN Sunan
Kalijaga Press. 1993.
Handrianto, Budi. 50 Tokoh Islam Liberal Indonesia Pengusung Sekularisme, Pluralisme, dan Liberalisme
Agama.Jakarta: Hujjah Press. 2007.
Kahmad, Dadang. Metode Penelitian Agama Perspektif Ilmu Perbandingan Agama. Bandung: CV Pustaka
Bandung. 2000.
Manaf, Mujahid Abdul. Ilmu Perbandingan Agama. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. 1994.
Rahmadi, dkk. Dinamika Pemikiran Sarjana Muslim tentang Metodologi Studi Agama di Indonesia. Kajian
terhadap Literatur Terpublikasi Tahun 1964-2012. Banjarmasin: IAIN Antasari Press. 2014.
Riyanto, Waryani Fajar. Integrasi-Interkoneksi Keilmuan: Biografi Intelektual M. Amin Abdullah (1953-…)
Person, Knowledge, and Institution (Buku Pertama). Yogyakarta: Suka Press. 2013.
———. Studi Islam Indonesia (1950-2014).Yogyakarta: Kurnia Kalam Semesta. 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).