PEMIKIRAN FILSAFAT MORAL IMMANUEL KANT (Deontologi, Imperatif Kategoris dan Postulat Rasio Praktis)

Authors

  • Mohammad Dahlan Universitas Darul ‘Ulum Jombang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v8i1.1369

Keywords:

etika kebahagiaan, etiak kewajiban, metafisika spekulatif, dan metafisika rasional.

Abstract

Immanuel Kant is a philosopher who successfully defines ethicsin terms of moral imperatives, not in terms of efforts to attain happiness.He also proposes a rational metaphysics as opposed to the speculativemetaphysics. In the context of rational metaphysics, Kant leads his moralphilosophy to religion, even though the latter is not directly put as thefoundation of the former.

References

Frans Magnis Suseno, 13 Tokoh Etika, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1997)

Harun Hadiwijoyo, Seri Sejarah Filsafat Barat 2, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1980)

Immanuel Kant, “Critique Of Pure Reason”, Jhon Cottingham (ed), dalam “Western Philosophy; An Anthology” (Cambridge: Blacwell Publishers, 1996).

K. Bertens, Ringkasan Sejarah Filsafat, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1975)

M. Amin Abdullah, The Idea of Universality of Ethical Norms in Ghazali and Kant (Turki: Diyanet Vakfi, 1992)

Immanuel Kant, “Prolegomena, zueiner jeden kuenftigen Metaphysik die alls Wissenschaft wird Auftreten koennen, Herausgegeben on Karl

Vorlaender” dalam Endang Daruni Asdi, Imperatif Kategoris dalam Filsafat Moral Immanuel Kant, (Jurnal Filsafat, no. 23 Nopember 1995)

Lorens Bagus, Kamus Filsafat, (Jakarta: Gramedia,2000).

Ahmad Tafsir, Filsafat Umum, (Bandung: Rosdakarya, 2001).

Haryatmoko, Penjelasan Seputar Filsafat Moral Immanuel Kant, di Kelas Filsafat Islam Semester III Pascasarjana IAIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Periode 2002-2003.

S.P. Lili Tjahjadi, Hukum Moral; Ajaran Immanuel Kant tentang Etika dan Imperatif

Kategoris, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1991).

Immanuel Kant, Kritik der Urttheilskrft (Critique of Judgement), terjemahan, J.H. Bernhard (New York: Hefner Press, 1951).

Downloads

Published

2009-01-04