Gender Bias in Academic Writing: Challenges and Equity Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/muadalah.v12i1.12543Abstract
This review synthesizes existing research on the intricate relationship between gender and academic writing, exploring gendered writing styles, perceptions of writing quality, representation in academic publishing, intersectionality with other social identities, and interventions to promote gender equity. Findings reveal nuanced variations in writing practices, with female scholars tending toward more tentative styles and male scholars favoring assertive approaches. Evaluation biases persist, perpetuating gender stereotypes that impact grading and recognition. Structural inequities manifest in academic publishing landscapes, hindering diverse representation. An intersectional lens elucidates the compounding effects of gender, race, class, and disciplinary affiliations. Interventions proposed include gender-neutral guidelines, bias training, diversity initiatives, and institutional policies supporting inclusivity. While progress has been made, ongoing efforts are needed to dismantle persisting biases, address inequities, and cultivate equitable spaces valuing diverse voices in knowledge production. This comprehensive review informs future research directions and institutional strategies toward gender equity in academic writing.References
Allen, K.-A., Butler-Henderson, K., Reupert, A., Longmuir, F., Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., Berger, E., Grove, C., Heffernan, A., Freeman, N., & Kewalramani, S. (2021). Work like a girl: Redressing gender inequity in academia through systemic solutions. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(3), 03.
Belcher, D. D. (1997). An argument for nonadversarial argumentation: On the relevance of the feminist critique of academic discourse to L2 writing pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(1), 1–21.
Bleich, D. (1989). Genders of writing. Journal of Advanced Composition, 10–25.
D’Angelo, L. (2008). Gender identity and authority in academic book reviews: An analysis of metadiscourse across disciplines.
Deats, S. M., & Lenker, L. T. (1994). Gender and academe: Feminist pedagogy and politics. Rowman & Littlefield.
Earl-Novell, S. (2001). "Gendered" styles of writing and the "inequality in assessment" hypothesis: An explanation for gender differentiation in first-class academic achievement at university. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21(1/2), 160–172.
Francis, B., Read, B., Melling, L., & Robson, J. (2003). University Lecturers’ Perceptions of Gender and Undergraduate Writing. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690301891
Francis, B., Robson, J., & Read, B. (2001). An Analysis of Undergraduate Writing Styles in the Context of Gender and Achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076282
Ghafoori, N., & Oghbatalab, R. (2012). A comparative study of metadiscourse in academic writing: Male vs. female authors of research articles in applied linguistics. https://www.sid.ir/paper/627007/fa
Haswell, R., & Wyche-Smith, S. (1994). Adventuring into writing assessment. College Composition and Communication, 45(2), 220–236.
Kamler, B. (1994). Gender and genre in early writing. Linguistics and Education, 6(2), 153–182.
Kirsch, G. (1993). Women writing the academy: Audience, authority, and transformation. SIU Press.
Lundine, J., Bourgeault, I. L., Glonti, K., Hutchinson, E., & Balabanova, D. (2019). “I don’t see gender”: Conceptualizing a gendered system of academic publishing. Social Science & Medicine, 235, 112388.
Macaro, E. (2019). Systematic reviews in applied linguistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 230–239). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780367824471-20/systematic-reviews-applied-linguistics-ernesto-macaro
Pasaribu, T. A. (2017). Male and female students’ use of textual discourse markers in writing academic essays. Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1), 74–81.
Peterson, S., & Bainbridge, J. (1998). Teachers’ gendered expectations and their evaluation of student writing. Reading Research and Instruction, 38(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079909558293
Poole, M., Bornholt, L., & Summers, F. (1997). An international study of the gendered nature of academic work: Some cross-cultural explorations. Higher Education, 34(3), 373–396.
Preece, S. (2018). Identity work in the academic writing classroom: Where gender meets social class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 32, 9–20.
Pullen, A. (2006). Gendering the Research Self: Social Practice and Corporeal Multiplicity in the Writing of Organizational Research. Gender, Work & Organization, 13(3), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00308.x
Read, B., Robson, J., & Francis, B. (2004). Re-viewing undergraduate writing: Tutors’ perceptions of essay qualities according to gender. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 9(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740400200176
Robson, J., Francis, B., & Read, B. (2002). Writes of Passage: Stylistic features of male and female undergraduate history essays. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877022000021757
Sala, M., & D’Angelo, L. (2009). Gender-and authority-related writing performance in academic research articles. Textus, 22(1 (2009)), 59–76.
Savigny, H. (2017). Cultural Sexism is Ordinary: Writing and Re‐Writing Women in Academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(6), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12190
Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2008). 'Robot Kung Fu': Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(7), 1232–1248.
White, K., Rumsey, S. K., & Amidon, S. (2016). Are We “There” Yet? The Treatment of Gender and Feminism in Technical, Business, and Workplace Writing Studies. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(1), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281615600637
Williams, E. A., Kolek, E. A., Saunders, D. B., Remaly, A., & Wells, R. S. (2018). Mirror on the Field: Gender, Authorship, and Research Methods in Higher Education’s Leading Journals. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(1), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1330599
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Arinal Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
