Faktor-Faktor Psikologis Perilaku Phubbing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/jsi.v9i2.4517Keywords:
Boredom, conformity, phubbing, Phubbing, kebosanan, konformitasAbstract
Phubbing is a common phenomenon in society and, at the same time, is considered inappropriate in social life. This study aims to determine whether social media addiction, boredom proneness, self-control, conformity, and demographic factors affect phubbing behavior. The sample in this study was 387 respondents consisting of active students of UIN Syarif Hidatyatullah Jakarta with probability sampling techniques with simple random sampling techniques. In this study, researchers used an adaptation of a phubbing measuring tool, namely the phubbing scale developed by Karadaǧ (2015), the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) developed by Andreassen et al. (2016), boredom proneness Scale-Sort Form (BPS -SF) developed by Vodanovich, Wallace and Kass (2005), self-control scale by Averill (1983), and adaptation conformity scale from measuring instrument developed by Myers (2010). This study indicates a significant influence between social media addiction, boredom proneness, self-control, conformity, and demographic factors on phubbing behavior by 28.7%, while other variables outside of this study influence 71.3%. In addition, three variables significantly influence phubbing behavior, namely social media addiction, self-control, and gender.References
Al-Saggaf, Y., MacCulloch, R., & Wiener, K. (2019). Trait Boredom Is a Predictor of Phubbing Frequency. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0080-4
Andreassen, C., & Pallesen, S. (2014). Social Network Site Addiction - An Overview. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20(25), 4053–4061. https://doi.org/10.2174/13816128113199990616
Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J., Mazzoni, E., Billieux, J., Demetrovics, Z., & Pallesen, S. (2016). The Relationship Between Addictive Use of Social Media and Video Games and Symptoms of Psychiatric Disorders: A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(2), 252–262.
Averill, J. R. (1983). Personal Control over Aversive Stimuli and its Relationship to Stress.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
Chou, W. J., Chang, Y. P., & Yen, C. F. (2018). Boredom proneness and its correlation with Internet addiction and Internet activities in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 34(8), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.016
David, M. E., & Roberts, J. A. (2017). Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1086/690940
Elhai, J. D., Vasquez, J. K., Lustgarten, S. D., Levine, J. C., & Hall, B. J. (2018). Proneness to Boredom Mediates Relationships Between Problematic Smartphone Use With Depression and Anxiety Severity. Social Science Computer Review, 36(6), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317741087
Fahlman, S. A., Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Flora, D. B., & Eastwood, J. D. (2013). Development and Validation of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale. Assessment, 20(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111421303
Griffiths, M. (2005). A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359
Karadaǧ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., Çulha, I., & Babadaǧ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.005
Leuppert, R., & Geber, S. (2020). Commonly done but not socially accepted? Phubbing and social norms in dyadic and small group settings. Communication Research Reports, 00(00), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1756767
Mikulas, W., & Vodanovich, S. J. (1993). The Essence of Boredom. The Psychological Record, 43(1), 3–12.
Moynihan, A. B., Igou, E. R., & van Tilburg, W. A. P. (2019). Lost in the crowd: Conformity as escape following disbelief in free will. In European Journal of Social Psychology (Vol. 49, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2499
Myers, D. G. (2010). SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Tenth Edition. In The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (Vol. 10). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276052.n353
Purwaningsih, I. E. (2011). Sikap Terhadap Rumah Kos Tanpa Induk Semang Ditinjau Dari Jenis Kelamin Dan Asal Daerah Pada Mahasiswa UST. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
Siyoto, S., & Sodik, M. A. (2015). DASAR METODOLOGI PENELITIAN (Ayup (ed.)). Literasi Media Publishing. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self‐control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 2(April 2004), 54.
Throuvala, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., Rennoldson, M., & Kuss, D. J. (2019). Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study. Computers in Human Behavior, 93(December 2018), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.012
Ugur, N. G., & Koc, T. (2015). Time for Digital Detox: Misuse of Mobile Technology and Phubbing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1022–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.491
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Hendrickson, A. T., Pollmann, M. M. H., & Ling, R. (2019). Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: An exploratory observation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 100(February 2018), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.004
Vernon, L., & Uink, B. (2017). Early results are in! What are Australians’ smartphone habits? EARLY SURVEY RESULTS.
Vodanovich Stephen J., Craig, W. J., & J., K. S. (2005). A Confirmatory Approach to the Factor Structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: Evidence for a Two-Factor Short Form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 3891(June), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8503
Zhang, K. Z. K., & Chen, C. (2015). Understanding the Role of Diversification. Asset Management : Tools and Strategies. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472920393.0014
Zhao, F. F., Guo, Y., Suhonen, R., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2016). Subjective well-being and its association with peer caring and resilience among nursing vs medical students: A questionnaire study. Nurse Education Today, 37, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.019
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).