About the Journal
Focus and Scope
Jurnal Studia Insania invites scholars, researchers, and students to contribute the results of their studies and researchers in the areas related to Islamic Psychology, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality which covers textual and fieldwork investigation with various perspective of Developmental Psychology, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Social Psychology, Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Indigenous Psychology and Psychometrics.
Peer Review Process
At least two reviewers independently review every manuscript submitted to Jurnal Studia Insania in the form of "double-blind review." The decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based on their reports/recommendation. In some instances, the editor may submit an article for review to another, the third reviewer before making a decision, if necessary.
Starting in 2017 published two times a year, (every Mei and November). Each number consists of 6 published articles
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Detail Jurnal Studia Insania
Jurnal Studia Insania is published in the printed version and the electronic version. Jurnal Studia Insania is a peer-reviewed journal in Islamic Psychology, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality that published by Faculty of Usuluddin and Humanities. Jurnal Studia Insania publication aims to facilitate the interaction, discussion, and renewal the notion of scientists, practitioners, and enthusiasts of Islamic psychology and psychologists
JSI is devoted to studies, though, and research on the development theory and application theory to the problems concerning the discipline of Islamic Psychology, psychology of religion and spirituality, Islamic studies on psychology and relevant issues about psychology in Islam perspective and tradition which includes the Developmental Psychology, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Social Psychology, Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Indigenous Psychology and Psychometrics. The current editor-in-chief is Halimatus Sak'diyah, and managing editor is Imadduddin Parhani.
Starting in 2017, Jurnal Studia Insania publishes articles two volumes a year, in May and November. All papers are published online as soon as they have been accepted (peer-reviewed and edited) by adding them to the "current" volume's Table of Contents.
Jurnal Studia Insania in 2017 will rise twice in one year. They are the edition in May and November.
- Jurnal Studia Insania in 2017 will also present articles covering a variety of essential topics and focus and on the Islamic Psychology and Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.
The published manuscript in Jurnal Studia Insania is article results of textual and fieldwork investigation, both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The studies are done individually or in groups.
The author whose manuscript will be published in Jurnal Studia Insania will only receive five printed papers and no printing costs nor shipping costs.
- The author does not incur the contribution cost of submission
A professional translator will examine the abstract of the article proper fit.
The author should revise based on the reviewer's feedback within the time limit set by the Editor. The editor reserves the right to improve the content and layout of script writing without altering the substance of the material.
Code of Conduct and Ethics Publications
Jurnal Studia Insania (ISSN 2355-1011 E-ISSN 2549-3019) is a peer-reviewed journal published Faculty of Ushuluddin and Humanities, UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, Editor In Chief, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Studia Insania is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles help and embody the scientific method. It is therefore essential to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.
Faculty of Ushuluddin and Humanities, UIN Antasari Banjarmasin as the publisher of Jurnal Studia Insania takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or additional commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Besides, the Faculty of Ushuluddin and Humanities, UIN Antasari Banjarmasin and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and publishers where this is useful and necessary.
The editor of the Jurnal Studia Insania is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its quick review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. The proper citation should accompany any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. False or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works and if the authors have used the work and words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or first publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper support of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
The invention should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their paper. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her published work, the author must promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Registration Journal and Journal Submit
Process List to Jurnal Studia Insania those who have signed up:
Go to the website of the Jurnal Studia Insania
Click the Menu List Register
Then fill out a form that has been provided
- After filling out a form and then click on the register
Once registered to check your email to find out the notification of the Jurnal Studia Insania containing usernames and passwords that have been given.
Username and password used to log in when submitting the manuscript of a journal.
Manuscript journals, authors institutions, and address correspondence to upload on the upload script.
The manuscript contains the title of the article, the identity /author and a brief bio as well as the correspondence address of thanks submitted/uploaded on additional file (supplementary file)
The submitted manuscript must use the templates provided. Papers that do not use the provided templates will not be processed further without notice.
Please download the form template Journal.
Screening plagiarism is done with the help of Viper Plagiarism Scanner application system and googles scholar plagiarism checker. This application is used to detect the use of the word similarity between the source document with document comparison.
Article Processing Charges
Every article submitted to Jurnal Studia Insania will not have any 'Article Processing Charges.' This includes lodging, peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining, archiving, and allowing immediate access to the full-text versions of the article