This is an outdated version published on 2024-02-12. Read the most recent version.

Adaptasi Alat Ukur Team Learning Capability (TLC) pada Karyawan Generasi Z

Authors

  • Shanty Komalasari Airlangga University of Surabaya
  • Seger Handoyo Universitas Airlangga Surabaya
  • Nuri Herachwati Universitas Airlangga Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/jsi.v11i1.10309

Keywords:

Adaptasi Alat Ukur, Karyawan Generasi Z, Team Learning Capability

Abstract

This research discusses the "Adaptation of Team learning capability (TLC) Measurement Tool in Generation Z." Team Learning, or team-based learning, refers to the capacity of organizational members to avoid making personal assumptions and to think freely together as one organization. Group research entails dialogue among organizational members and the presence of customs that allow them to express their thoughts freely and openly for the benefit of the organization. The measurement tool used in this study is the result of the adaptation of the Team learning capability (TLC) measurement tool by Batt-Rawden et al. (2018). The method used is qualitative, with the technique of distributing questionnaires through Google Forms. There are several criteria for respondents in this study, namely those born between 1995 and 2010, currently or previously employed, and willing to participate as respondents. One hundred four (104) respondents filled out the questionnaire through Google Forms, and most respondents were born between 1999 and 2003. This research is expected to provide information on the adaptation of the measurement tool for Generation Z using the Team learning capability (TLC) measurement tool by Batt-Rawden et al. (2018).

References

Association, A. E. R., Association, A. P., on Measurement in Education, N. C., & others. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. (No Title).

Batt-Rawden, V. H., Lien, G., & Slåtten, T. (2019). Team learning capability – an instrument for innovation ambidexterity? International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 11(4), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2019-0026

DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32.

Delić, M., Slåtten, T., Milić, B., Marjanović, U., & Vulanović, S. (2017). Fostering learning organisation in transitional economy--the role of authentic leadership and employee affective commitment. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 9(3/4), 441–455.

Drucker, P. F. (2002). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 95–102.

Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. John Wiley & Sons.

Erhardt, N. (2011). Is it all about teamwork? Understanding processes in team-based knowledge work. Management Learning, 42(1), 87–112.

Gregoire, J. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134.

Hewitt, G., Sims, S., & Harris, R. (2014). Using realist synthesis to understand the mechanisms of interprofessional teamwork in health and social care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(6), 501–506.

Idris, M. A., Dollard, M. F., & Tuckey, M. R. (2015). Psychosocial safety climate as a management tool for employee engagement and performance: A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Stress Management, 22(2), 183.

Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5–18.

Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.

Lencioni, P. (2007). Conquer team dysfunction. Retrieved November, 12, 2007.

Luthans, F. (2015). Organizational Behavior - An Evidence-based Approach (13th ed.). McGraw Hill Inc.

Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991.

Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299–326.

Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.

Morgeson, F. P., Reider, M. H., & Campion, M. A. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 583–611.

Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (2013). Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic press.

Nikolova, I., Van Ruysseveldt, J., De Witte, H., & Van Dam, K. (2014). Learning climate scale: Construction, reliability and initial validity evidence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 258–265.

Schneider, B., González-Romá, V., Ostroff, C., & West, M. A. (2017). Organizational climate and culture: Reflections on the history of the constructs in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 468.

Selnes, F., & Sallis, J. (2003). Promoting relationship learning. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 80–95.

Slåtten, T., & Lien, G. (2016). Consequences of employees’ collective engagement in knowledge-based service firms. Journal of Service Science Research, 8, 95–129.

Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104.

Wardhani, N. S., Sulastiana, M., & Ashriyana, R. (2022). Adaptasi Alat Ukur Learning Agility pada Karyawan untuk Meningkatkan Organizational Agility: Versi Bahasa Indonesia. Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi, 27(2), 243–264.

Yang, C.-F., & Lai, C.-S. (2012). Relationship learning from organizational knowledge stores. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 421–428.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-12

Versions

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Shanty Komalasari, Seger Handoyo, Nuri Herachwati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).