TAHAP PENGETAHUAN MAHASISWA UNIVERSITI AWAM (UA) NEGERI SELANGOR TERHADAP ILMU PERBANDINGAN AGAMA

Authors

  • Aemy Elyani Mat Zain Jabatan Kefahaman dan Pemikiran Islam, Pusat Pengajian Teras, Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa
  • Nazneen Binti Ismail Jabatan Dakwah Dan Usuluddin, Fakulti Pengajian Peradaban Islam, Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor. Bandar Seri Putra, 43000 Kajang, Selangor
  • Norsaadah Din@ Mohamad Nasirudin Jabatan Kefahaman Dan Pemikiran Islam, Pusat Pengajian Teras, Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor Bandar Seri Putra, 43000 Kajang, Selangor
  • Maryam Habibah Kamis Pembantu Penyelidik, Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor Bandar Seri Putra, 43000 Kajang, Selangor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/al-banjari.v18i2.3409

Keywords:

Tahap Pengetahuan, Mahasiswa, Universitas Umum, Selangor, Perbandingan Agama

Abstract

The field of Comparative Religion is getting more attention from most scholars in the world, including Malaysia. This is parallel with the nature of the Malaysian community which is diverse. The more one knows of the knowledge in comparative religion, the more one is sensitive when interacting with the people of other religions. Hence, in the context of university students in Malaysia, how far is their level of knowledge in comparative religion? This study is going to analyse on the level of knowledge among public university students in Selangor towards the field of comparative religion. This is based on the respondents’ demography which are gender, age, state originality, secondary education, department of study and the phase of the study in university. The method employed is quantitative which used the Statistical Packages for the Social Science (SPSS) For Windows (version 22.0) and the findings are analysed descriptively. The result shows that Min distribution is a high 4.04 Overall, it is shown that the majority of the public university students have certain knowledge in the field of comparative religion.Ilmu perbandingan agama merupakan satu bidang ilmu yang semakin mendapat tempat masyarakat dunia termasuk Malaysia. Ini menepati dengan sifat rakyat Malaysia yang majmuk. Semakin seseorang itu mengetahui tentang ilmu perbandingan agama, semakin dia peka apabila bergaul dan berinteraksi dengan penganut agama lain. Namun, dalam konteks mahasiswa universiti, bagaimana tahap pengetahuan mereka terhadap ilmu perbandingan agama. Maka, kajian ini dilakukan bagi menganalisis sejauh mana tahap pengetahuan mahasiswa universiti awam di Selangor terhadap ilmu perbandingan agama berdasarkan demografi mahasiswa dari segi jantina, umur, negeri asal, sekolah menengah terakhir, fakulti dan peringkat pengajian. Metod kajian yang dilakukan adalah kuantitatif yang menggunakan perisian Statistical Packages for the Social Science (SPSS) For Windows versi 22.0 dan seterusnya hasil kajian dihuraikan secara deskriptif yang merangkumi nilai kekerapan dan peratusan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa tahap pengetahuan mahasiswa universiti awam negeri Selangor mengenai ilmu perbandingan agama mencapai taburan min yang tinggi iaitu 4.04. Ini jelas membuktikan bahawa mahasiswa universiti awam Selangor mempunyai pengetahuan yang jelas terhadap ilmu perbandingan agama.

References

Aemy Elyani Mat Zain. “Pendekatan Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia (IKIM) Dan Islamic Information and Services Foundation (IIS) Dalam Dialog Antara Agama Di Malaysia.” Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2015.

Azhar Ahmad. “Strategi Pembelajaran Dan Pengaturan Kendiri Pendidikan Islam Dan Penghayatan Akhlak Pelajar Sekolah Menengah.” Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2006.

Faisal Ahmad Shah, Haziyah Hussin, Latifah Abdul Majid, Sabri Mohamad, Fadlan Mohd Othman. “Interfaith Dialogue: Approaches, Ethics and Issues.” International Journal of Asian Social Science, 12, 3 (n.d.): 2455–64.

Gay & Airasian. Educational Research: Competencies For Analysis And Applications. Boston: Florida International University, n.d.

John W.Creswell. Mixed Methods Research & Mixed Methods Reader. 2008th ed. T.tp: SAGE Publication, n.d.

Mohd Faizal Abdulkhir. “Metode Perbandingan Deskriptif Dalam Perbandingan Agama: Suatu Analisis Terhadap Metode al-Quran.” QURANICA-International Journal of Quranic Research,v, 1, 2 (2012): 131–45.

Mohd Najib Abdul Ghafar. Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2013.

Sekaran. Research Methods for Business A Skill-Building Approach. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

Taslim HM.Yasin. “Membangun Hubungan Antara Agama Mewujudkan Dialog Dan Kerjasama.” Jurnal Substantia, 1, 12 (2011): 85–91.

Tuckman, Bruce W. Conducting Educational Research. San Diego, California: Harcourt Brace, 1994.

Wan Haslan Khairuddin. “Tema Dan Metode Kritikan Rahmatullah Al-Kayranawi Terhadap Bible Berdasarkan Kitab Izhar al-Haq.” Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2018.

Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi W.Razali. “Tema-Tema Ilmu Kajian Agama Dalam Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldun: Satu Perbahasan Ringkas,” 2017.

Wiersma. Research Methods In Education: An Introduction. London: Allyn & Bacon, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).