Peer Review Process

 

Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman is a peer-reviewed journal of Islamic Studies published by the Graduate School of Antasari State Islamic University of Banjarmasin. This journal is published twice a year (June and December) in both print and online versions and provides a forum for publishing the original research articles and review articles related to issues in the area of Indonesian and Malay Islamic Studies from scholars of related disciplines. All submitted papers are subject to double-blind review process.

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Blind Preview Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects. Peer Reviewer that collaboration with Al-Banjari Journal is the experts in the Islamic studies area and issues around it. They were experienced in the prestigious journal and publication that was spread around the national.

At Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman , we uphold a meticulous peer review process to ensure the integrity and quality of published research. Here's a detailed overview of our review procedures:

1. Submission Evaluation:
Upon receiving a submission, the editorial team conducts an initial evaluation to ensure it aligns with the journal's scope and guidelines.

2. Assignment to Reviewers:
Suitable expert reviewers are carefully selected based on their expertise in the paper's subject matter. Reviewers are chosen for their academic qualifications, research experience, and knowledge in the specific field.

3. Double-Blind Review:
Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman  employs a double-blind review process, where both the reviewer and author identities are kept confidential. This anonymity ensures unbiased evaluation.

4. Review Criteria:
Reviewers assess various aspects of the manuscript, including:
- Title, Abstract, and Structure: Reviewers evaluate the clarity and appropriateness of the title and abstract. They also check if the paper adheres to the standard structure, including introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.
- Content Quality: Reviewers examine the depth of the research, the validity of methods used, and the soundness of conclusions drawn.
- Originality and Innovation: The manuscript's novelty and innovative aspects are assessed to determine its contribution to the field.
- Scientific Impact: Reviewers evaluate the potential impact of the research on the scientific community and its relevance to existing literature.
- References: The quality and appropriateness of the references cited are analyzed to ensure a strong theoretical foundation.

5. Peer Review Reports:
Reviewers provide detailed reports outlining their comments, suggestions, and recommendations. Authors receive these reports, which may include constructive feedback for revisions.

6. Decision Making:
Based on the peer review reports, the editorial team makes an informed decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection of the manuscript. Authors are promptly notified of the editorial decision along with reviewers' comments.

7. Revision and Resubmission:
If revisions are required, authors are encouraged to address reviewers' comments and revise the manuscript accordingly. The revised version undergoes further evaluation before a final decision is made.

8. Publication:
Once accepted, the paper moves into the production process, eventually leading to its publication in Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 

This rigorous and thorough peer review process ensures that the articles published in Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman meet the highest academic standards and contribute significantly to the field of study.