MEMBEDAH TEORI SOSIOLOGI: Teori Pertukaran (Exchange Theory) George Caspar Homans

Wardani Wardani

Abstract


This article is aimed at analyzing critically George Caspar Homans’s theory of exchange. The critical analysis that may be called here simply as “maping ideology” embodied in theory is needed to place the theory within the specific social and political condition, intellectual background, school of thought having great influence on it, and so forth, and also to assesses its limitedness as a theoretical frame-work of scientific research to explain complicated social phenomenon or human interaction. Influenced by psychological and economic theories, Homans’s theory of exchange has been intended at the beginning by the author as attack against Marxism domination that addressed criticism to capitalism as macro-structure oppressing the proletariat by the ruling class and against Durkheimian structural functionalism. By addressing the attack against Marxism and because of his intellectual and social background, Homans’s theory then has been regarded as an explanation justifying the existing situation. Being attributed as psychological reductionism, as neglecting the important role of structure, and deterministic are some of the objections addressed to his theory.      


Keywords


Pertukaran Sosial; Stimulus-Respon; Ganjaran-Hukuman (Reward-Punishment)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Basrowi, Muhammad dan Soenyono. Teori Sosial dalam Tiga Paradigma. Surabaya: Yayasan Kampusina, 2004.

Homans, George C. Elementary Form of Social Behavior. 2nd edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974,sebagaimana dikutip dalam http; //www2. pfeiffer. edu/~Iridener/ courses/ GENPROP. HTML.

Jary, David dan Julia Jary. The Harper Collins Dictionary of Sociology. New York: Harper Collins, 1991.

Maliki, Zainuddin. Narasi Agung: Tiga Teori Sosial Hegemonik. Surabaya: Ipam, 2003.

Nur Syam. Bukan Dunia Berbeda: Sosiologi Komunitas Islam. Surabaya: Jenggala Pustaka Utama, 2004.

Pals, Daniel L. Seven Theories of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Poloma, Margaret M. Contemporary Sociological Theory, terjemah tim Yasogama. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2004.

Ritzer, George Contemporary Sociological Theory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1988.

____________. Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1980.

____________. Sociology: A Multiple-Paradigm Science, terjemah Alimandan dengan judul Sosiologi: Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2004.

Ritzer, George dan Douglas J. Goodman. Modern Sociological Theory, terjemah Alimandan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.

Wagner, David G. “Daring Modesty: on Metatheory, Observation, and Theory Growth”, Steven Seiman dan David G. Wagner (eds.). Postmodernism and Social Theory. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1992.

Wallace, Walter L. The Logic of Science in Sociology. Diterjemahkan Yasogama dengan judul Metoda Logika Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1994.

Young, Lawrence A. (ed.). Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment (New York: Routledge, 1997.

http: www.kfunigraz. ac.at/ 502www/ogsoe/lexikon/klassiker/homans/23bio.htm.

http; //www2. pfeiffer. edu/~Iridener/ courses/ GENPROP.HTML.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/jsi.v4i1.1111

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Wardani Wardani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Studia Insania Indexed By :

 
 Collaborate with API-HIMPSI (Asosiasi Psikologi Islam-Himpunan Psikologi Indonesia)

ISSN: 2355-1011 (Cetak); 2549-3019(Online)
Jurnal Studia Insania
Banjarmasin - Indonesia

Creative Commons License
All publications
by Jurnal Studia Insania are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
International License.