Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
AT-TARADHI: JURNAL STUDI EKONOMI maintains the standards of peer review while enhancing the efficiency of the process.
All manuscripts published in AT-TARADHI: JURNAL STUDI EKONOMI undergo a full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:
- All submissions are firstly evaluated their suitability and eligibility in terms of the journal's focus and scope as well as academic writing standards by the journal's handling editor. Inappropriate manuscripts to the journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review.
- After passing the in-house editorial evaluation above, all manuscripts are then reviewed by at least one suitably external reviewer.
- The review process employs a double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author's identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa.
- In the review process, reviewers consider the correspondence of title, abstract, discussion (findings), and conclusions. Beside, reviewers also examine the novelty, scientific impact, and references used in the paper.
- All publication decisions are made by the journal's Editor in chief on the basis of the reviews provided.
- Managing Editors provide the administrative support that allows the journal to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and handling editors alike.