https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/issue/feed Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 2025-12-12T03:43:58+00:00 Anwar Hafidzi [email protected] Open Journal Systems <h2>Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran</h2> <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tbody align="top"> <tr> <td>Journal Title</td> <td>: Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran</td> </tr> <tr> <td>E-ISSN</td> <td> <div>: <strong><a href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1482190991">2549-001X</a> </strong></div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>DOI Prefix</td> <td>: Prefix <a href="https://search.crossref.org/?q=2460-7606&amp;from_ui=yes" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10.18592</a> by Crossref <img src="http://educasia.or.id/public/site/images/educasiasinta2/CROSREFF_Kecil2.png" alt="" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Editor in Chief</td> <td> <div>: <a>Anwar Hafidzi</a> (Scopus ID: 57215653628) </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>E-mail</td> <td>: [email protected] </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Publisher</td> <td>: Fakultas Syariah, <a href="https://www.uin-antasari.ac.id/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari </a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Frequency</td> <td>: 2 issues per year (July and December)</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top">Citation Analysis</td> <td> <div data-sider-select-id="dcfb562c-1246-49fa-850f-ac1c24328aeb">: <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18o0koZkymkqJzdlKV-zNNr9rqT7AcNRT/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sinta</a> | <a href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=YH31L-IAAAAJ&amp;hl=id&amp;authuser=2">Google Scholar</a><a href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=YH31L-IAAAAJ&amp;hl=id&amp;authuser=2"> </a>| <a href="https://suggestor.step.scopus.com/progressTracker/?trackingID=01875519029644D6">Scopus</a> | <a href="https://doaj.org/toc/2549-001X?source=%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22filtered%22%3A%7B%22filter%22%3A%7B%22bool%22%3A%7B%22must%22%3A%5B%7B%22terms%22%3A%7B%22index.issn.exact%22%3A%5B%221412-6303%22%2C%222549-001X%22%5D%7D%7D%2C%7B%22term%22%3A%7B%22_type%22%3A%22article%22%7D%7D%5D%7D%7D%2C%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22size%22%3A100%2C%22_source%22%3A%7B%7D%7D">DOAJ</a> | <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/19IeUMoyjsIjo07f3yZxVRfdzsUxq9bSG/view?usp=sharing" data-sider-select-id="5ddf4411-a3a4-40ac-ae56-ac5210193acc">Sinta 1</a></div> <div> </div> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/18181 Reconstructing Information Law Theory in Confronting Fake News: An Analysis of Digital Media Ethics Based on Regulation and Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah 2025-09-29T00:45:08+00:00 Mochamad Riyanto [email protected] Ahmad Roihan Firdiansyah [email protected] <p>The spread of fake news in the digital era has posed complex challenges to journalism ethics, legal regulation, and social stability. Existing information laws tend to be reactive and have not integrated ethical dimensions or religious values. This study presents a new theoretical model based on <em>maqā</em><em>ṣ</em><em>id al-sharī</em><em>ʿ</em><em>ah</em>, integrating professional ethics, positive law, and Islamic legal principles as a framework for reconstructing Media and Press Law. Using a normative-qualitative approach, this study analyzes press regulations in Indonesia, selected scientific literature, and Islamic legal doctrine—particularly the concepts of <em>ta</em><em>ʿ</em><em>z</em><em>ī</em><em>r</em> and <em>maq</em><em>ā</em><em>ṣ</em><em>id al-sharī</em><em>ʿ</em><em>ah</em>—through thematic analysis with source selection criteria and a conceptual coding process to identify gaps between media ethics, regulations, and <em>fiqh</em>. This approach examines how misinformation and disinformation threaten the protection of reason (<em>ḥ</em><em>if</em><em>ẓ</em><em> al-</em><em>ʿ</em><em>aql</em>) and religion (<em>ḥ</em><em>if</em><em>ẓ</em><em> al-dīn</em>), which are the core objectives of Sharia. The study's results indicate that integrating the principles of information verification (<em>tabayyun</em>), accountability, and public responsibility into the legal system and journalistic practices can increase resilience to disinformation. The information governance model based on <em>maqā</em><em>ṣ</em><em>id</em>, formulated in this study, is a conceptual contribution that aligns law enforcement with journalistic ethics, ensuring that freedom of expression remains guaranteed while upholding the collective obligation to maintain truth and justice in the digital public space. In addition, this study proposes policy indicators that translate the objectives of <em>maqā</em><em>ṣ</em><em>id al-sharī</em><em>ʿ</em><em>ah</em> into regulatory measures that can be implemented by media institutions and state authorities, thereby building an adaptive and ethically based regulatory framework to address the threat of disinformation within the scope of Media and Press Law.</p> 2025-12-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Mochamad Riyanto, Ahmad Roihan Firdiansyah https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/18090 Harmonizing Constitutional Law and Islamic Law in Protecting Papua’s Cultural Heritage amid Infrastructure Development: A Case Study of the Aitumeiri Civilization Stone Site 2025-12-12T03:43:58+00:00 Enny Martha Sasea [email protected] Marwati Riza [email protected] Syamsul Bachri [email protected] Ahmad Masum [email protected] Maskun Maskun [email protected] <p>Rapid infrastructure development in Papua has intensified tension between economic growth and the protection of indigenous cultural heritage. This condition represents a critical phenomenon marked by regulatory change and the urgent need for sustainable legal solutions in culturally sensitive regions. Existing legal frameworks often operate in a fragmented manner, weakening effective heritage protection. The theoretical framework of this study lies at the intersection of constitutional law, Islamic law, and legal pluralism. Although the Indonesian Constitution guarantees cultural advancement and the recognition of indigenous rights, and Islamic law provides ethical guidance through maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, their integration in heritage governance remains limited. This study aims to examine the harmonization of constitutional law and Islamic law in protecting Papua’s cultural heritage, using the Aitumeiri Civilization Stone Site as a case study. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by qualitative analysis and a maqāṣid al-sharīʿah framework focusing on the protection of religion, intellect, and lineage. The findings reveal overlapping regulations, weak intergovernmental coordination, and limited indigenous participation as major obstacles to effective heritage governance. Integrating maqāṣid al-sharīʿah into constitutional interpretation strengthens normative coherence and moral legitimacy. In conclusion, harmonized and inclusive legal frameworks are essential to safeguard Papua’s cultural heritage within sustainable development. The study recommends strengthening maqāṣid-based regional regulations, institutionalizing consultative mechanisms inspired by shūrā, and mandating heritage impact assessments involving indigenous communities.</p> 2026-01-02T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Enny Martha Sasea, Marwati Riza, Syamsul Bachri, Ahmad Masum https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/18275 Sharia Fintech Contract Architecture: Developing a Standardization Framework Based on the Convergence of Fiqh, Fatwas, and Judicial Decisions 2025-09-30T08:14:33+00:00 Yasardin Yasardin [email protected] Amelia Rahmaniah [email protected] Avisena Ilma Rachmasari [email protected] <p>The rapid expansion of Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) schemes represents a major shift in consumer finance and has entered Islamic financial markets with significant controversy. While promoted as an inclusive financing solution, Islamic BNPL raises urgent concerns regarding hybrid contracts, Shariah compliance, and consumer protection. This trend reflects both technological change and a regulatory gap that demands systematic assessment and normative solutions.Existing studies on Islamic fintech largely focus on compliance checklists or technical contracts, leaving unresolved tensions between innovation, governance, and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This research addresses the problem of whether Islamic BNPL can be structured as a Shariah-compliant instrument that also supports economic democratization. Using doctrinal and normative legal analysis, this study examines Islamic BNPL practices through the lenses of Shariah governance, contract theory, and Islamic economic principles. The analysis reveals that loosely structured hybrid contracts often generate legal ambiguity, misallocate risk, and weaken ethical safeguards. Conversely, BNPL models grounded in clear contractual separation and effective Shariah oversight show stronger alignment with justice and inclusivity. This study concludes that Islamic BNPL requires governance reform rather than mere contractual labeling. It recommends regulatory harmonization, strengthened Shariah supervision, and contract standardization to ensure that BNPL contributes to responsible financial access and equitable economic development.</p> 2025-12-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Yasardin Yasardin, Amelia Rahmaniah, Avisena Ilma Rachmasari https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/18226 Barriers to Halal Certification among Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Makassar: Financial, Digital, and Governance Perspectives 2025-09-29T00:55:33+00:00 Reslawati Reslawati [email protected] R. Adang Nofandi [email protected] Ahsanul Khalikin [email protected] <p>This study examines how the dynamics of halal certification shape the experiences of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Makassar, South Sulawesi, in the aftermath of the Halal Product Assurance Law (UU JPH). While previous scholarship has repeatedly highlighted financial burdens, regulatory complexity, and technological gaps, few studies explore how these challenges unfold in specific local contexts. Drawing on a qualitative design that combined field observation, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews, this research identifies the barriers encountered by MSMEs and evaluates the real outcomes of government-led support initiatives in Makassar. The findings reveal that persistent financial constraints, uneven levels of digital literacy, and weak institutional coordination remain the most significant obstacles to effective certification. These issues are analyzed through the lenses of policy implementation, governance, and service quality, showing that systemic institutional weaknesses, rather than mere technical inefficiencies, lie at the heart of these challenges. By situating Makassar’s case within broader debates on Indonesia’s halal governance, the study demonstrates how localized insights can illuminate gaps in national implementation frameworks. The results underscore the urgent need for targeted financial assistance, integrated governance reforms, and sustained capacity-building programs to ensure that MSMEs are not only able to comply with certification requirements but also benefit from their participation in the growing halal economy, while providing context sensitive field perspectives that are rarely addressed in existing literature.</p> 2025-12-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Adang Nofandi, Reslawati Reslawati, Ahsanul Khalikin https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/18166 Negotiating Sacred Law: Qur’anic Hermeneutics, Legal Pluralism, and Interfaith Marriage in Muslim-Majority Countries 2025-10-07T00:27:59+00:00 Syarif Syarif [email protected] Saifuddin Herlambang [email protected] Budiyono Budiyono [email protected] Gama Pratama [email protected] Fharkhan Luthfi [email protected] Nur Paikah [email protected] <p>Interfaith marriage remains a persistently contested legal issue in Muslim-majority societies, situated at the intersection of Islamic legal authority, state constitutional frameworks, and global human rights discourses. The complexity of this debate has intensified within the context of the modern nation-state, which manages religious pluralism through state law and bureaucratic governance. This article examines how marital norms within Islamic law are not only formulated at the normative level but also negotiated, reinterpreted, and enacted within contemporary regimes of legal pluralism. Employing a qualitative approach grounded in an interdisciplinary framework, the study integrates doctrinal legal analysis, Qur’anic hermeneutics, and cross-national comparative law. Primary data are drawn from regulations and legal practices governing interfaith marriage in Indonesia, Egypt, Malaysia, and Turkey, while secondary data consist of classical <em>fiqh</em> (Islamic jurisprudence) literature, Qur’anic exegetical works, and relevant contemporary scholarship. The findings reveal a spectrum of regulatory models ranging from absolute prohibition and ambiguous tolerance to hybrid regulation and secular permission, shaped by the complex interaction of <em>fiqh</em> doctrines, state bureaucratic governance, and social dynamics. The study further highlights the strategic role of bureaucratic actors in producing what is termed pragmatic <em>fiqh</em>, as well as the transnational strategies employed by interfaith couples to navigate restrictive domestic legal frameworks. Theoretically, the article introduces the concepts of negotiated orthodoxy and <em>fiqh</em> pragmatism as analytical tools for understanding the adaptation and transformation of Islamic law in modern contexts. In doing so, the study contributes to contemporary debates on Islamic legal pluralism by advancing <em>fiqh</em> pragmatism as an adaptive paradigm that bridges sacred norms and modern social realities.</p> 2026-01-03T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Syarif, Saifuddin Herlambang, Budiyono, Gama Pratama, Fharkhan Luthfi, Nur Paikah https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/16592 Ethical Contestation in Law Enforcement: Reactualizing Islamic Values within Indonesia’s Rule of Law Framework. 2025-11-26T05:00:32+00:00 Muhammad Taufik [email protected] Muhammad Zainal Abidin [email protected] Elsayed Amin [email protected] Rusfian Effendi [email protected] <p style="font-weight: 400;">Violations of ethical values have become a common phenomenon that occurs in law enforcement in Indonesia nowadays. Violations of ethical values have become a topic of discussion and debate in the public space, with society discussing the weak law enforcement and the difficulty of getting justice. The purpose of this research is to analyze the contestation of ethical values in law enforcement by reactivating Islamic values to achieve the supremacy of law. Academically, this research is important because it reinforces the ethical theory that states that the right action aligns with moral norms. In this case, law enforcement must be carried out, as it is a shared duty and responsibility. Meanwhile, in practice, violations of ethical values in law enforcement become a serious moral issue. This research uses a qualitative approach with in-depth exploration, digging into data scattered across the internet and online news. The research findings indicate that the public debate about ethics and the weak enforcement of the law has become commonplace. Moreover, ethical values must be applied in law enforcement, so as not to trigger debates and discussions about how justice and ethics should be realized. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the contestation of ethical values in law enforcement can be achieved by reactivating Islamic values to realize the supremacy of the law. Based on these findings, this study suggests the need for continuous training in law enforcement to create a just society. Additionally, the public should be given space to have their opinions heard to improve law enforcement in the future.</p> 2025-12-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Taufik, Muhammad Zainal Abidin; Elsayed Amin; Rusfian Effendi https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/18269 Reconstructing The Legal Protection Of Indonesian Migrant Workers Facing The Death Penalty (Jinayat) In Saudi Arabia: National And International Legal Perspectives 2025-09-29T05:42:42+00:00 Ahmad Muchlis [email protected] Pujiyono Pujiyono [email protected] Nabitatus Sa'adah [email protected] <p data-start="148" data-end="790"> </p> <p>This study examines the reconstruction of the legal protection model for Indonesian migrant workers (PMI) facing the death penalty in Saudi Arabia from both national and international legal perspectives. The research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of existing legal instruments, identify implementation gaps, and propose a comprehensive, human rights–based model of protection. Employing a normative juridical (doctrinal) method, the study analyzes Indonesia’s constitutional and statutory framework, international conventions such as the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963), and the structure of Saudi Arabia’s jināyāt legal system. The findings reveal that although Indonesia possesses a robust national legal framework, weak implementation, inadequate inter-agency coordination, and limited bilateral enforcement mechanisms continue to expose migrant workers to severe human rights risks, particularly due to Saudi Arabia’s non-compliance with Mandatory Consular Notification (MCN). The study recommends the establishment of binding bilateral agreements, the strengthening of legal diplomacy and attaché functions, and the harmonization of national law with international human rights standards. The implications highlight that migrant worker protection must operate as an integrated system—covering prevention, legal assistance, and post-trial support—to effectively realize the state’s constitutional duty to protect its citizens abroad.</p> <p> </p> 2025-10-23T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Muchlis, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Nabitatus Sa'adah https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/16325 The Formulation of Islamic Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) To Achieve Sharia Economic Democratization 2025-11-17T01:08:10+00:00 Prawitra Thalib [email protected] Fahrian Saleh Siregar [email protected] Wimboko Wimboko [email protected] Ibtisam @ Ilyana Ilias [email protected] Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono [email protected] <p>The rapid growth of financial technology has reshaped global economic structures and accelerated the diffusion of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) schemes, which commonly rely on interest‑based deferred payments. In Muslim‑majority jurisdictions such as Indonesia, this raises controversy over the permissibility of BNPL, given its riba‑like charges and opaque fee structures, alongside a regulatory gap that has not yet been addressed through a dedicated Islamic BNPL framework. This article examines that gap by asking, first, how a Sharia‑compliant BNPL model can be normatively formulated? and second, how such a model can contribute to achieving Sharia economic democracy? Using normative legal research based on historical and systematic interpretation, and employing conceptual, statute, and comparative approaches, the study analyses BNPL regulation and practice in Qatar, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The findings show that current Indonesian BNPL products embed riba, gharar, and unjust enrichment, whereas Qatar and Malaysia have begun to redesign BNPL through <em>Murabaha, Ijarah, and Qard</em> contracts under explicit Sharia governance and consumer‑protection rules. The study then proposes a legal‑contractual model for Islamic BNPL that combines fixed‑price or cost‑based fees, transparent contractual disclosure, capped non‑profit penalties, and formal Sharia supervision, operationalised through indicators of access, affordability, transparency, anti‑exploitation, and ethical governance. The article concludes by recommending that Indonesian regulators adopt a specific Islamic BNPL act, integrate Islamic supervisory mechanisms, and standardise consumer‑protection safeguards so that Islamic BNPL can function as an instrument of inclusive finance and Sharia‑based economic democracy.</p> 2025-12-15T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Prawitra Thalib, Fahrian Saleh Siregar, Wimboko, Ibtisam @ Ilyana Ilias, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono