Future Competition Law In Indonesia: Analysis Of The Phenomenon Of Disruptive Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v21i2.4448Keywords:
Competition Act, Disruptive Innovation, Politic of LawsAbstract
Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa status hukum dari ada nya disruptive innovation terhadap penerapan hukum persaingan usaha dan untuk menentukan arah kebijakan hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia pada masa yang akan datang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan Undang-Undang serta memanfaatkan data sekunder. Dewasa ini, permasalahan terkait penerapan hukum persaingan usaha mulai memuncak dikarenakan hadirnya disruptive innovation, inovasi yang merusak ini mampu merubah paradigma produsen dan konsumen terhadap aktivitas bisnis, yang mana terbiasa melakukan transaksi secara langsung atau tradisonal. Muncul nya teknologi modern akibat ada nya revolusi industri 4.0, mampu mengkombinasikan automisasi dan komputerisasi produk dengan internet, berdampak pada hadirnya inovasi-inovasi yang merusak produk pendahulu. Disruptive innovation memberikan kesempatan bagi produsen untuk menawarkan produk nya secara efisien dan tepat sasaran melalui online-based offerings untuk memfasilitasi konsumen dengan berbagai pilihan produk. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa ada nya konsep disruptive innovation justru mampu merangsang sikap berkompetisi para produsen menjadi lebih intensif, dan bagi konsumen dapat memberikan kemudahan dalam menentukan pilihan produk berdasarkan kebutuhan dan kesanggupan secara ekonomi. Dalam hubungan nya dengan politik hukum Undang-Undang persaingan usaha, perlu diperhatikan bahwa hukum persaingan usaha seharusnya dirujuk sebagai social control dan social engineering untuk menciptakan pasar yang efisien dan efektif dengan menggunakan Pasal 33 UUD 1945 sebagai dasar menentukan arah kebijakan pasar.Kata Kunci: Hukum Persaingan Usaha; Inovasi yang Merusak; Politik Hukum Abstract: This research aims to analyze the legal status of disruptive innovation concerning the competition act and outline the policy direction of business competition regulations. In conducting this research, the author uses normative research methods by utilizing secondary data. In recent years, legal issues related to business competition have culminated in the presence of innovations that can change the paradigm of producers and consumers towards market activity habits, which are accustomed to conducting direct transactions. The emergence of modern technology has created a new, fourth industrial revolution that combines automation and computing with the internet of things. Disruptive innovation enables producers to offer their products and services efficiently and effectively through online-based offerings to provide consumers with various product choices to determine their needs efficiently and according to economic capacity. This paradigm shift must be balanced with regulations that can limit the legal corridors that have been adjusted to create prosperity for consumers and producers. It can be concluded that disruptive innovation has made the competition very intensive for consumers, making it easier for them to make choices according to economic capacity. In connection with the legal politics of business competition regulation, the law must be directed as a means of social control and social engineering to make business competition effective and efficient by still paying attention to Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution as the basis for market policy direction. Keywords: Competition Act; Disruptive Innovation; Politic of LawsReferences
Atmasasmita, Romli. Teori Hukum Integratif, Rekontruksi terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2012).
FX Joko Priyono. Hukum Perdagangan Jasa (GATS/WTO), Filosofi, Teori dan Implikasi bagi Profesi Hukum di Indonesia (Semarang: Diponegoro Press, 2010).
Fajar, Mukti & Ahmad Yulianto. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normative dan Empiris, cet. ke 4 ed (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017).
Friedman, W. Legal Theory (London: Steven & sons limited, 1960).
Keraf, ASony. Etika Bisnis: Tuntutan dan Relevansinya (Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 1998).
Kurniawan, Lutfi J & Mustafa Lutfi. Perihal Negara, Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik (Semarang: Setara, 2011).
Muladi. “Menyongsong Keberadaan UU Persaingan Sehat di Indonesia”, dalam UU Anti monopoli Seperti Apakah yang Sesungguhnya Kita Butuhkan? (Jakarta: Yayasan Pusat Pengkajian Hukum).
Prayoga, Ayudha D. Persaingan Usaha dan Hukum yang Mengaturnya di indonesia (Jakarta: Proyek ELIPS, 2000).
Rasjidi, Lili. Dasar - Dasar filsafat Hukum (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1996).
Tambunan, Tulus. UMKM Indonesia- Rangkuman Hasil Sejumlah Penelitian (Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, 2014).
Dolmans, Maurits & Tobia Pesch. “Should we disrupt antitrust law?” (2019) 5:2 Compet Law Policy Debate.
Fajar, Mukti, Dyah Mutiarin & Reni Budi Setianingrum. “Disruptive Innovation on Competition Law: Regulation Issues of Online Transportation in Indonesia” (2019) 5:2 Eur J Econ Bus Stud 23–37.
Garland, Laura, Balasundram Maniam & Geetha Subramaniam. “Implications of disruptive technology in the fourth industrial revolution” (2019) 28:8 Special Issue Int J Adv Sci Technol 839–848.
Hutchinson, Terry. “Legal Research in the Fourth Industrial Revolution” (2017) 43:2 Monash Univ Law Rev 567–590.
Khan, Lina M. “Amazon ’ s Antitrust Paradox” (2016) 126:3 Yale Law J 710–805.
Maryanto & Lathifah Hanim. “Application of Competition Law Against Business Communities Using Disruptive Innovation” (2019) 1:1 Sultan Agung Notary Law Rev 33–45.
Rusydi, Ibnu. “Disruptive Innovation Dalam Kajian Hukum Persaingan Usaha” (2017) 5:2 J Ilm Galuh Justisi 192–205.
Saleh, Rosdiana. “Kebijakan hukum untuk meningkatkan daya saing produk UKM Unggulan Indonesia dalam rangka ASEN Economic Community” (2015) 5:1 Prioris 1–18.
Wafiya. “Politik Hukum Pembentukan Undang-Undang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat” (2015) 8:4 Fiat Justisia 657–680.
Wei, Hsin-Fang. “Does Disruptive Innovation ‘ Disrupt ’ Competition Law Enforcement ? The Review and Reflection” (2017) 25:2 1–27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.