Reconstructing Gender Equality in Family Law: A Normative and Comparative Analysis of European Family Law Systems in Religious Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.17694Abstract
This study examines the normative and doctrinal foundations of gender equality in European family law and investigates how Christian and Islamic religious heritage continues to shape contemporary legal interpretations and outcomes. Using a multi-method designcombining normative legal analysis, cross-jurisdictional comparison, and qualitative assessment of statutory frameworks, case law, and scholarly literature, the study evaluates legal mechanisms regulating gender relations through the lenses of critical gender theory, intersectional analysis, and religious ethics. The findings reveal marked divergences in matrimonial property regimes, valuation of care work, and principles governing divorce. Despite widespread recognition of formal equality, substantive inequalities remain embedded due to the undervaluation of domestic labor, tensions between autonomy and compensation principles, and the persistence of cultural “cryptotypes” rooted in religious and historical traditions. The analysis demonstrates that Christian and Islamic heritages exert dual influences: they reinforce patriarchal norms while simultaneously offering internal interpretive pathways for gender-progressive reform. The results underscore that, although European family law systems show increasing convergence toward human rights standards, doctrinal inconsistencies and implicit judicial biases continue to limit equitable outcomes. The study proposes a reconstructed model of family law incorporating gender-sensitive jurisprudence, equitable valuation of non-financial contributions, stronger regulation of religious adjudicatory bodies, and gender-responsive judicial training. This research contributes conceptual clarity and policy-relevant insights into how family law can be restructured to advance substantive gender equality within Europe’s diverse socio-legal contexts.References
Al Kadumi, Fitri, Nadiyah Seff, and Abdul Hakim. “The Reconstruction of Islamic Family Law in Indonesia: A Normative-Comparative Analysis of Gender Justice and Legal Modernity.” ASEAN Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization (AJISC) 1, no. 1 (2024): 1–19.
American University. “Comparative Family Law.” https://www.american.edu/wcl/impact/initiatives-programs/gender/projects/family-law/.
Arake, Lukman, Ma’adul Yaqien Makkarateng, Kurniati Abidin, Elviana Baharuddin, and Muhammad Yusuf. “Non-Binary Gender in Siyasah Syar’iyah Perspective: Study at Religious Universities in South Sulawesi.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 3 (2023): 1708–33. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.20152.
Arake, Lukman, Ma’adul Yaqien Makkarateng, Kurniati Abidin, Elviana Baharuddin, and Muhammad Yusuf. “Non-Binary Gender in Siyasah Syar’iyah Perspective: Study at Religious Universities in South Sulawesi.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 3 (2023): 1708–33. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.20152.
ari, M. Khoirul Hadi al-Asy’. “STATUS HUKUM PEREMPUAN MENURUT IBN ḤĀZM DAN KEDUDUKANNYA DALAM KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI).” Al-Ahkam, October 24, 2015, 161–80. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2015.25.2.600.
Baker, Katharine. “Equality and Family Autonomy.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 24, no. 2 (2022): 412.
Beschastnyi, V., S. Shkliar, A. Fomenko, N. Obushenko, and L. Nalyvaiko. “Place of Court Precedent in the System of Law of the European Union and in the System of Law of Ukraine.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 22, no. 6 (2019).
Contributor, Guest. “How Did the German Church Become the Leaders of Catholic LGBTQ Equality?” New Ways Ministry, March 21, 2022. https://www.newwaysministry.org/2022/03/21/how-did-the-german-church-become-the-leaders-of-catholic-lgbtq-equality/.
“Cover-Up: French Gender Equality and the Islamic Headscarf - Ideas | Institute for Advanced Study.” June 26, 2015. https://www.ias.edu/ideas/scott-cover-up.
Eidrup, Martin. “The Study of Muslim Family Norms in Contemporary Europe: A Systematic Scoping Review.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, March 29, 2025, rwaf005. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaf005.
“Family Law 2025 | Global Practice Guides | Chambers and Partners.”. https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/family-law-2025.
“Family, Law, and Society: From Roman Law to the Present Day - SWPS University.” https://english.swps.pl/science-and-research/review-our-research-output/publications-in-english/33917-family-law-and-society-from-roman-law-to-the-present-day.
Fitriyati, Yusida, Duski Ibrahim, Firman Muntaqo, and KN Shofyan Hasan. “Reconsidering Inheritance Equality: Gender Justice in Religious Court Decisions through the Lens of Maqashid Al-Shariah.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 25, no. 1 (2025): 122–40. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i1.27133.
“Gender Equality in Research and Innovation - Research and Innovation.” October 14, 2025.
Gerhard, Ute. “Legal Particularism and the Complexity of Women’s Rights in Nineteenth-Century Germany.” Private Law and Social Inequality in the Industrial Age: Comparing Legal Cultures in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States, 2000, 137–54.
Gerhard, Ute. “Women’s Rights in Civil Law in Europe (nineteenth century).” Clio. Women, Gender, History 43, no. 1 (2016): 250–73. https://doi.org/10.4000/clio.13020.
Huda, Miftahul, and Tri Wahyu Hidayati. “The Concept of Muḥammad Shaḥrūr on Gender Parity in Inheritance Legislation.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 6, no. 2 (2023): 262–80. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i2.18121.
Leheza, Yevhen, Larysa Yerofieienko, and Volodymyr Komashko. “Peculiarities of Legal Regulation of Intellectual Property Protection in Ukraine under Martial Law: Administrative and Civil Aspects.” Revista Justiça Do Direito 37, no. 3 (2023): 157–72. https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v37i3.15233.
Mahfiana, Layyin, Noor Dzuhaidah Binti Osman, Evi Ariyani, and Lutfiana Zahriani. “Influence of Religion and Culture on Women’s Rights in Joint Property Settlements in Java, Indonesia.” Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 25, no. 1 (2025): 117–38. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i1.117-138.
“Marriage Equality and Its Relationship to Family Law.” Harvard Law Review, n.d. https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-129/marriage-equality-and-its-relationship-to-family-law/.
Mudhofar ’Afif, Achmad, Maskur Rosyid, and Lutfi Lutfi. “Gender Equality in Islamic Sharia (The Study of Bisri Mustofa’s Thought in Al-Ibrīz Li Ma’rifah Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān Al-’Azīz).” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 22, no. 1 (2022): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v22i1.6307.
Nafisah, Durotun. “Positivisasi Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Gender.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2013): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v7i1.575.
Powers, Francis. “Religion and the Law.” Catholic University Law Review 1, no. 3 (1951): 115–21.
Puteh, Hjh Norhartijah binti Haji, and Cecep Soleh Kurniawan. “Reforming Islamic Family Law in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei Darussalam.” ASEAN Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization (AJISC) 2, no. 1 (2025): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.62976/ajisc.v2i1.1367.
Ramli, Mohd Anuar, Annuar Ramadhon Kasa, Nurhidayah Muhamad Sharifuddin, Muhammad Yusri Yusof, and Paiz Hassan. “The Quest for Third Gender Equality: Challenges and Implications for Islamic Law and Muslim Women’s Sustainability in Malaysia.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 24, no. 2 (2024): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i2.37746.
Reinterpreting Religious Texts on Gender Equality: The Perspective of Ahmad Syafii Maarif | JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah). n.d. https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/article/view/10233.
ResearchGate. “Peculiarities of Legal Regulation of Intellectual Property Protection in Ukraine under Martial Law: Administrative and Civil Aspects.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379499862_Peculiarities_of_legal_regulation_of_intellectual_property_protection_in_Ukraine_under_martial_law_administrative_and_civil_aspects.
Routledge & CRC Press. “Family Law, Sex and Society: A Comparative Study of Family Law.” https://www.routledge.com/Family-Law-Sex-and-Society-A-Comparative-Study-of-Family-Law/DeCruz/p/book/9781859416389.
Selby, Jenn. “How Can UK Law Help Islamic Sharia Councils Promote Gender Equality?” EachOther, March 27, 2019. https://eachother.org.uk/how-can-uk-law-help-islamic-sharia-councils-promote-gender-equality/.
Sholihah, Hani, Nani Nani Widiawati2, and Mohd Khairul Nazif bin Hj Awang Damit. “Reinterpretation of Justice in Islamic Inheritance Rights Based on Gender.” Al-’Adalah 21, no. 1 (2024): 101–24. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v21i1.21256.
The Evolving Landscape of Family Law: Addressing Contemporary Issues | International Journal of Law Management & Humanities. n.d. https://ijlmh.com/paper/the-evolving-landscape-of-family-law-addressing-contemporary-issues/.
The History of the European Family. With Internet Archive. New Haven : Yale University Press, 2001. http://archive.org/details/historyofeuropea0003unse_j8y1.
Tsivolas, Theodosios. Law and Religious Cultural Heritage in Europe. Springer International Publishing, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07932-5.
Vitvitskiy, S. S., O. N. Kurakin, P. S. Pokataev, O. M. Skriabin, and D. B. Sanakoiev. “Formation of a New Paradigm of Anti-Money Laundering: The Experience of Ukraine.” Problems and Perspectives in Management 19, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.30.
Wagner, Joachim. “Islamic Mediators Facilitate ‘Two Legal Systems’ in Germany.” International. Der Spiegel, June 20, 2012. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/islamic-mediators-facilitate-two-legal-systems-in-germany-a-839580.html.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Viktoriia Kobko Odarii, Yuliia Leheza, Konstantin Sokolovskiy, Oleksandra Nestertsova Sobakar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
