Delegitimization Of Religious Motives in Polygamy in Banjar Society

Authors

  • Zainal Muttaqin Dahli Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari
  • Masyithah Umar Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari, Banjarmasin
  • Mujiburohman Mujiburohman Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari, Banjarmasin
  • Rusdiyah Rusdiyah Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Sa'adah Sa'adah Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Nadiyah Khalid Seff Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari, Banjarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v24i1.12392

Abstract

In fact, the practice of polygamy in the Banjar community is often carried out without being recorded and gives rise to legal problems, not only in the form of not fulfilling the right to justice but also gives rise to physical, verbal, and psychological violence. It is often that religion becomes a 'shield' in the form of unconscious motives to cover up the truly practical motives. The purpose of this writing is to describe why the practice of polygamy in Banjar society, with its duality of motives, actually creates problems and why religion is always a 'shield'. This research was conducted empirically with data obtained from the interview process with informants and then analyzed using a socio-legal approach. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the practice of polygamy for religious reasons as an unconscious motive has the potential to give rise to unfair polygamous behavior, acts of violence, and a disregard for the protection of rights and the law. The textual and partial interpretation of polygamy texts supported by a patriarchal socio-cultural system is the basis for legitimizing this behavior, even though this behavior is not by the essential goals of marriage including polygamy and the applicable regulations. Making religion an unconscious motive is something that is considered effective in legitimizing polygamy because, by the religious character of Banjarese society with Islam being an ethnic identity, the practice of polygamy is understood as a natural and legitimate thing.  This condition is strongly supported by the traditionalist reasoning that many Banjar people adhere to so that often the understanding of a tuan guru includes polygamy as an accepted truth. This is because of the position of the tuan guru who is considered as an authoritative figure in every aspect of Banjarese people's life.

References

Anam, Haikal Fadhil. “Poligami dalam Hermeneutika Feminis Amina Wadud.” Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam 19, no. 1 (Januari 2020): 43–56. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2020.191.43-56.

Attoh, Franca Chitoh. “Gender, Religion And Patriarchy: A Sociological Analysis Of Catholicism And Pentecostalism In Nigeria.” Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 4, no. 14 (25 Juli 2017). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.414.3482.

Aziz, Muhammad, dan Athoillah Islamy. “Memahami Pencatatan Perkawinan di Indonesia dalam Paradigma Hukum Islam Kontemporer.” Islamitsch Familierecht Journal 3, no. 02 (14 November 2022): 94–113. https://doi.org/10.32923/ifj.v3i02.2776.

Aziz, Nasaiy, Rispalman Rispalman, dan Tika Anggraini. “Polygamy in the Perspective of Tafsīr Al-Aḥkām and Islamic Law: An Examination of the Gayo Luwes Community in Aceh, Indonesia.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 3 (19 Oktober 2023): 1682–1707. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.20021.

Dharma, Ferry Adhi. “Konstruksi Realitas Sosial:Pemikiran Peter L. Berger Tentang Kenyataan Sosial.” Kanal: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 7, no. 1 (1 September 2018): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21070/kanal.v6i2.101.

Effendi, Rustam. “Cucupatian (Teka-Teki) Banjar: Analisis Struktur, Fungsi, Dan Nilai Budaya.” Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia 36, no. 2 (2010): 209–43. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v36i2.652.

———. “Mahalabiu: Media Kritik Sosial Masyarakat Banjar (Mahalabiu: The Media Of Social Critics Of Banjar Society).” Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya 7, no. 2 (26 Januari 2018): 173. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v7i2.4418.

———. Mahilung Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Banjar. Banjarmasin: Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 2021.

Fadhli, Ashabul, dan Fathur Rahmi. “Ijtihad Hakim Pengadilan Agama pada Perkara Poligami.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 19, no. 2 (18 Desember 2020): 215–29. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v19i2.2429.

Firmansyah, Ahmad Aziz Masyhadi, dan Deden Fardan Hamdani. “The Duality of Islam and Arabic: Criticism of The Expression ‘Take The Islam and Through The Arabic.’” Transformatif (Studi Islam) 6, no. 1 (28 April 2022): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.23971/tf.v6i1.3881.

Hamim, Khairul. “Comparison Between Double Movement Theory and Nazariyyat Al-Hudud Theory on Polygamy Laws.” El-Mashlahah 12, no. 2 (31 Desember 2022): 190–209. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v12i2.4903.

Helim, Abdul. “Poligami Perspektif Ulama Banjar.” ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 12, no. 1 (2017): 50–79. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2017.12.1.

———. “Poligami Perspektif Ulama Banjar.” ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 12, no. 1 (4 September 2017): 50–70. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2018.12.2.176-205.

Helim, Abdul, Aris Sunandar Suradilaga, Wafid Syuja’ Vennovary Benevolent, dan Rabiatul Adawiyah. “Cumulative Versus Alternative Conditions: A Study of Polygyny Permits in Indonesia From the Perspective of the Legal Certainty Principle.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah 15, no. 1 (4 Juli 2023): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i1.15384.

Hjelm, Titus. “Peter L. Berger and the Sociology of Religion.” Journal of Classical Sociology 18, no. 3 (Agustus 2018): 231–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X18761217.

———. “Rethinking the Theoretical Base of Peter L. Berger’s Sociology of Religion: Social Construction, Power, and Discourse.” Critical Research on Religion 7, no. 3 (Desember 2019): 223–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303219874392.

Iman, Iman Fadhilah, Tedi Kholiludin, Muhammad Lutfi Hakim, dan Ubbadul Adzkiya’. “Exploring the Monogamy Principle in the Samin Community’s Customary Marriages in Kudus: Harmonisation of Tradition and State Law.” Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 23, no. 2 (2023): 281–304. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v23i2.281-304.

Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal. “Otoritarianisme Pemahaman Keagamaan: Melacak Akar Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan dalam Rumah Tangga.” Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak 16, no. 1 (17 Juni 2021): 49–70. https://doi.org/10.24090/yinyang.v16i1.3999.

Karman. “Konsep Dualisme Versus Dualitas dalam Diskursus Epistemologi Ilmu Sosial.” Majalah Semi Ilmiah Populer Komunikasi Massa 2, no. 1 (Juni 2021): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.09.063.

Kharisudin, Kharisudin. “Nikah Siri Dalam Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia.” Perspektif 26, no. 1 (30 Januari 2021): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v26i1.791.

Khitam, Husnul. “Pencatatan Perkawinan: Suatu Analisis Sejarah Sosial.” Islamitsch Familierecht Journal 3, no. 02 (14 November 2022): 170–78. https://doi.org/10.32923/ifj.v3i02.2757.

Kholis, Nur, Jumaiyah Jumaiyah, dan Wahidullah Wahidullah. “Poligami dan Ketidakadilan Gender dalam Undang-undang Perkawinan di Indonesia.” Al-Ahkam 27, no. 2 (12 Oktober 2017): 195–212. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2017.27.2.1971.

Kolasi, Klevis. “Structuration Theory.” Dalam The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies, disunting oleh Scott Romaniuk, Manish Thapa, dan Péter Marton, 1–4. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_360-1.

Kristianto, Paulus Eko. “Integrasi Teori Strukturasi Anthony Giddens dan Kajian Feminis pada Kebijakan Sumber Daya Manusia di Tempat Kerja.” Dekonstruksi 7, no. 01 (1 Juli 2022): 136–59. https://doi.org/10.54154/dekonstruksi.v7i01.106.

M. Fahmi, Al Amruzi, Zainal Muttaqin, dan Rusdiyah. “Discussing the Concept of Harta Perpantangan of Ijtihad Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari.” Dalam Perspevtive and Paradigm of Sharian Reason Theory, 1 ed., 1–319. Pekalongan: PT. Nasya Expanding Management, 2022. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=pLyjEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA320&lpg=PA320&dq=Perspective+and+Paradigm+of+Sharia+Reason+Theory&source=bl&ots=b7yZTcLxNK&sig=ACfU3U0xD7jBT9Eb8YpILyTysbOqrnQ96Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjUroqK5q-EAxWpR2wGHdfcBA4Q6AF6BAg_EAM#v=onepage&q=Perspective%20and%20Paradigm%20of%20Sharia%20Reason%20Theory&f=false.

Muhibbuthabry, Muhibbuthabry. “Poligami Dan Sanksinya Menurut Perundang-Undangan Negara-Negara Modern.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 16, no. 1 (28 Januari 2016). https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/view/2891.

Muthalib, Salman Abdul. “Pengesahan Isbat Nikah Perkawinan Poligami: Kajian Putusan Nomor 130/Pdt.G/2020/Ms.Bna.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 5, no. 2 (12 Mei 2023): 224–38. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v5i2.16040.

Muzzammil, Shofiyullah, Mohammad Affan, Muhammad Alwi Hs, dan Masturiyah Masturiyah. “Motif, Konstruksi, dan Keadilan Semu dalam Praktik Poligami Kiai Pesantren di Madura.” Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi) 7, no. 01 (22 Juni 2021): 129–42. https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v7i01.1207.

Nadhiroh, Wardatun. “Nalar Keberagamaan Masyarakat Banjar: Dari Mistis-Realis Hingga Tradisionalis-Kritis.” Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 18, no. 2 (28 Desember 2019): 246. https://doi.org/10.18592/al-banjari.v18i2.3003.

———. “Religious and Gender Issues In the Tradition of Basurung and the Polygamy of Banjar Tuan Guru in South Kalimantan.” Al-Albab 6, no. 2 (1 Desember 2017): 263. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v6i2.674.

———. “Religious and Gender Issues In the Tradition of Basurung and the Polygamy of Banjar Tuan Guru in South Kalimantan.” Al-Albab 6, no. 2 (1 Desember 2017): 263. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v6i2.674.

Nofialdi, Nofialdi, Elimartati Elimartati, Syukri Iska, Deri Rizal, Firdaus Firdaus, Kasmidin Kasmidin, dan Hamdani Hamdani. “The Ambiguity of Using the Statement of Absolute Responsibility Based on Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019: Study in Dharmasraya Regency, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 23, no. 1 (29 Juni 2023): 108–20. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i1.1358.

Nurnazli, Nurnazli, Hashm Omer Ahmad, Linda Firdawaty, M. Yasin al Arif, dan Muhammad Akmansyah. “The Contestation of Islamic Boarding School Womens’s View of Wifes’ Rights in Poligamy.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 24, no. 1 (22 Juni 2024): 16–35. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1349.

Romadloni, Fitria. “Pencatatan Perkawinan Dalam Perspektif Maqasid Syariah.” Opinia de Journal 3, no. 4 (2023): 48–62. https://doi.org/10.35888/opinia.v3i2.45.

Sa’adah, Nurus, Vita Fitria, dan Kurnia Widiastuti. “Poligami dalam Lintas Budaya dan Agama: Meta-Interpretation Approach.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 49, no. 2 (2015): 479–99. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v49i2.151.

Sadat, Anwar, dan Ipandang Ipandang. “Dinamika Poligami Di Tengah Budaya Oligarkis-Patriarkis (Studi Pada Masyarakat Poliwali Mandar Dan Konawe Sulawesi).” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 14, no. 1 (2 Juni 2020): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v14i1.3657.

Sari, Yuliati Puspita. “Mahalabiu: Ketaksaan Makna Dalam Bahasa Banjar.” Salingka: Majalah Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra 13, no. 2 (2016): 103–13.

Septiandani, Dian, Ani Triwati, dan Efi Yulistyowati. “Kemaslahatan dalam Perkawinan Poligami Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 3 (26 Oktober 2023): 466. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i3.7236.

Suminar, Panji. “Relasi Agen Dan Struktur: Ruang Negosiasi Dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan Di Kabupaten Lebong.” Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara 6, no. 1 (17 Juni 2020): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsn.6.1.55-76.

Supraptiningsih, Umi, dan Khoirul Bariyyah. “Marriage Settlement among Minority Moslem by Datok Imam Masjid in South Thailand.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 14, no. 2 (10 Desember 2019): 221–36. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v14i2.2631.

Tarigan, Azhari Akmal, Nurhayati, dan Watni Marpaung. “Taming Islam’ Polygyny Law: Revealing Male Sexual Desire in Indonesia’s Polygyny Practices.” Journal Of Indonesian Islam 15, no. 01 (2021): 149–70. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2021.15.1.149-170.

———. “Taming Islam’s Polygyny Law: Revealing Male Sexual Desire in Indonesia’s Polygyny Practices.” Journal of Indonesian Islam 15, no. 01 (2021): 149–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2021.15.1.149-170.

Wafi, Akhmad, Almejiem Aditya Wijaya, Muhammad Noor Ridani, Budi Rahmat Hakim, dan Muhammad Haris. “Reaktualisasi Persyaratan Perempuan Menjadi Saksi Perkara Perdata Dalam Fikih Klasik Dan Korelasinya Pada Hukum Modern.” Journal Of Islamic And Law Studies 7, no. 2 (27 November 2023): 186–206. https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v7i2.11550.

Wahdini, Muhammad, Ariyadi Ariyadi, dan Muhammad Torieq Abdillah. “Pandemi Covid-19 dan Ekspresi Beragama: Studi Pelaksanaan Majelis Taklim di Kota Banjarmasin.” The Sociology of Islam 5, no. 1 (30 Juni 2022): 36–53. https://doi.org/10.15642/jsi.2022.5.1.36-53.

Widiyanto, Hari. “Konsep Pernikahan Dalam Islam (Studi Fenomenologis Penundaanpernikahan Di Masa Pandemi).” Jurnal Islam Nusantara 04, no. 01 (2020): 103–10. https://doi.org/10.33852/jurnalin.v4i1.213.

Wijaya, Ina Yosia, dan Lidya Putri Loviona. “Kapitalisme, Patriarki dan Globalisasi: Menuju Langgengnya Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online.” Jurnal Wanita dan Keluarga 2, no. 1 (26 Juli 2021): 52–64. https://doi.org/10.22146/jwk.2243.

Zahrah, Muhammad Abu. Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah. 2 ed. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi, 1950.

Zainuddin, Zainuddin, dan Zaki Ulya. “Recording Siri’s Marriages In Obtaining Legal Certainty (Reflections on the rise of Siri marriages in Aceh).” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 21, no. 1 (22 Maret 2021): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v1i1.3276.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-27

Issue

Section

Articles