Sintesis metodologi penelitian kuantitatif dalam kajian informasi: tren, inovasi, dan arah pengembangan di era transformasi digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/pk.v13i2.17784Keywords:
inovasi metodologis, kecerdasan buatan, metode kuantitatif, analisis statistik, studi informasiAbstract
Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menelaah dan menggabungkan berbagai pendekatan, temuan, dan desain penelitian kuantitatif guna membentuk pemahaman menyeluruh mengenai tren metodologi yang digunakan. Penelitian ini menyajikan sintesis dari delapan studi terkini (2020–2025), dengan kriteria (1) terbit pada rentang 2020–2025, (2) mewakili topik-topik strategis dalam bidang perpustakaan dan informasi, dan (3) mencakup beragam jenis metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Analisis difokuskan pada: (1) permasalahan yang diangkat dan tujuan penelitian, (2) desain penelitian dan teknik pengumpulan data, (3) teknik analisis data dan upaya menjaga keabsahan temuan, serta (4) hasil utama, pembahasan, dan kebaruan dari setiap studi. Hasil sintesis menunjukkan bahwa para peneliti menyoroti kesenjangan pengetahuan pada konteks lokal atau topik baru (misalnya kurangnya pustakawan data di negara berkembang, minimnya kurikulum preservasi digital, dll.) dan meresponnya dengan pendekatan metodologis beragam seperti survei kuantitatif, analisis konten, bibliometrik, hingga pengembangan model kecerdasan buatan. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya peningkatan kompetensi profesional informasi dalam menghadapi transformasi digital. Para peneliti pada bidang ini berupaya menjaga relevansi disiplin ini dengan cara berinovasi pada metodologi dan memperluas domain kajian.References
Ashiq, M. & Warraich, N.F. (2024). Librarian’s perception on data librarianship core concepts: a survey of motivational factors, challenges, skills and appropriate trainings platforms. Library Hi Tech, 42(3), 849–866
Atoy Jr., M. B., Garcia, F. R. O., Cadungog, R. R., Cua, J. D. O., Mangunay, S. C., & de Guzman, A.
B. (2020). Linking digital literacy and online information searching strategies of Philippine university students: The moderating role of mindfulness. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(4), 1015–1027
C
hu, H., Qing Ke, Q. (2017) Research methods: What's in the name?, Library & Information Science Research, 39 (4): p. 284-294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.001.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Cox, A.M., Kennan, M.A., Lyon, L., Pinfield, S. and Sbaffi, L. (2019), “Maturing research data
services and the transformation of academic libraries”, Journal of Documentation, 75 (6)
pp. 1432-1462.
Garnita, N., Larasati, D., Fitriani, Y., Rizal, M., & Hayaza, R. (2024). From Classroom to Global Goals: A Bibliometric Analysis of Universitas Indonesia’s Student Projects Addressing SDG 3. F1000Research, 13, (Art. 140695)
Granikov, V., Hong,Q. N., Crist, E., Pluye, P. (2020) Mixed methods research in library and information science: A methodological review. Library & Information Science Research, 42 (1) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101003.
Ghosh, S. (2024). Integrating quantitative methods in LIS research: Opportunities and constraints. Journal of Documentation, 80(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2023-0054
Ghorbi,A. , Karimi,A. and seifi,K. (2024). Mapping the Evolution and Impact of Information Science Research in the Middle East: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Study. InfoScience Trends, 1(2), 16-28. doi: 10.61186/ist.202401.01.11
Heting Chu, H., Ke, Q. (2017) Research methods: What's in the name? Library & Information Science Research, 39 (4), p. 284-294.
Hikmawati, N., (2020). Mind mapping dalam pembelajaran ipa sekolah dasar (studi meta-sintesis). Kariman, 08 (02): p. 303-326
Kim, S., & Park, H. (2022). Quantitative approaches in library and information science: A bibliometric analysis of research methods. Information Processing & Management, 59(5), 103045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103045
Kharazishvili, Y., & Kwilinski, A. (2022). Methodology for Determining the Limit Values of National Security Indicators Using Artificial Intelligence Methods. Virtual Economics, 5(4), 7–26
Li, J., & Zhao, L. (2021). Emerging quantitative techniques in information research: From surveys to computational modeling. Information Development, 37(4), 516–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920962642
Liu, S., & Jia, J. (2025). A quantitative study of vocabulary categorization and reuse in the LIS field linked data. Online Information Review, 49(2), 246–268
Mayesti, N., Huang, C. H., Azmir, A. F., & Adzani, D. M. (2024). Librarians’ views of the readiness of university libraries in Indonesia to adopt virtual and augmented reality. Digital Library Perspectives, 40(2), 212–230
Merga, M. K., & Mat Roni, S. (2025). School library professionals’ perceptions of students’ digital information literacy. Journal of Library Administration, 63(1), (Advance online publication)
Pandey, P., Madhusudhan, M., & Singh, B. P. 2023. Quantitative research approach and its
applications in library and information science research. ACCESS: An International
Journal of Nepal Library Association, 2, 77–80.
Wattanasiri , et.al. 2024. Analyzing Global Trends and Collaborations in Library and Information Science Research: A Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis Perspective. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope (IRJMS), 5(4): 117-130
Risso, V. G. (2016). Research methods used in library and information science during the 1970–2010. New Library World, 117(1/2), 74–93.
Ullah, A& Ameen, K., (2018). Account of methodologies and methods applied in LIS research:
A systematic review, Library & Information Science Research, 40 (1): p. 53-60
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.03.002.
Yoon, A. and Donaldson, D.R. (2019), “Library capacity for data curation services: a US national
survey”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 811-828.
Yoon, A., Murillo, A. P., & McNally, P. A. (2021). Digital Preservation in LIS Education: A Content Analysis of Course Syllabi. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(1), 61–86
Zhou, X., & Liu, Y. (2025). Mapping methodological evolution in information science research: A quantitative synthesis (2015–2025). Scientometrics, 130(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04912-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adi Priyono, Agustina Setianingrum, Margareta Aulia Rachman, Sudirman Sudirman , Paulina Pannen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) Author (s)

Pustaka Karya: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in Pustaka Karya are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Pustaka Karya.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Pustaka Karya to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in Pustaka Karya, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.






1.png)
1.png)
