PENGARUH INTERAKSI PEMBELAJARAN TERHADAP KEPUASAN MAHASISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN DARING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/ptk.v9i1.8722Abstract
Abstract: Online learning provides more opportunities and flexibility in constructing knowledge and acquire skills. However, it also creates transactional distance. Students become more anxious and feel pressured. The distance makes the learning process does not meet student needs and interests. Learning interaction offers a key to minimize the distance and ensuring learning satisfaction. Satisfaction indicates the meaningful activities in the learning process. This research aims to investigate the effect of balanced interaction between humans and learning content on student satisfaction. A Quasi-experimental posttest-only group design was used. The experimental group was taught using an online flipped classroom with balanced interaction, and the control group was taught using a traditional online classroom. Two intact classes that consist of 44 students were used. This research found out that level of student satisfaction in both groups were at a moderate level. Although statistically not significant, the mean differences showed that students in the control group felt more satisfied than students in the experimental group. Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Interaction, Online Learning, Satisfaction. Abstrak: Pembelajaran daring memberikan lebih banyak kesempatan dan fleksibilitas dalam membangun pengetahuan dan memperoleh keterampilan. Namun, hal itu juga menciptakan jarak transaksional. Mahasiswa menjadi lebih cemas dan merasa tertekan. Jarak membuat proses pembelajaran tidak sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan minat mahasiswa. Interaksi belajar menawarkan kunci untuk meminimalkan jarak dan memastikan kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran. Kepuasan pembelajaran menunjukkan adanya kegiatan yang bermakna dalam proses pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh interaksi pembelajaran seimbang antara manusia dan konten pembelajaran terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan kuasi eksperimen dengan posttest-only group design. Kelompok eksperimen dibelajarkan menggunakan strategi kelas terbalik daring yang dipadukan dengan interaksi seimbang, dan kelompok kontrol dibelajarkan menggunakan strategi kelas daring tradisional. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua kelas utuh yang terdiri atas 44 mahasiswa. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa pada kedua kelompok berada pada tingkat sedang. Meskipun secara statistik tidak signifikan, perbedaan rata-rata menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa di kelompok kontrol merasa lebih puas daripada mahasiswa di kelompok eksperimen.Kata Kunci: Kelas Terbalik, Kepuasan, Interaksi Pembelajaran, Pembelajaran Daring.References
Alqurashi, E. (2018). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Asoodar, M., Vaezi, S., & Izanloo, B. (2016). Computers in Human Behavior Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 704–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.060
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies engagement strategies. Distance Education, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041
Chae, S. E., & Shin, J. (2015). Tutoring styles that encourage learner satisfaction , academic engagement , and achievement in an online environment. Interactive Learning Environment, February 2015, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1009472
Degeng, I. N. S. (2014). Ilmu pembelajaran klasifikasi variabel untuk pengembangan teori dan penelitian. Bandung Aras Media.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.
Hara, N. (2000). Student Distress In A Web-Based Education Course. Information , Communication & Society, 3(4), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180010002297
Horzum, M. B. (2015). Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(3), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a
Kang, M., & Imt, T. (2013). Factors of learner – instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12005
Kwon, K., Park, S. J., Shin, S., & Chang, C. Y. (2019). Effects of different types of instructor comments in online discussions. Distance Education, 40(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1602469
Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., & Rhame, S. (2021). A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 96(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592
Lee, H., & Rha, I. (2009). Influence of Structure and Interaction on Student Achievement and Satisfaction in Web- Based Distance Learning. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4).
Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient, and engaging instruction. Pfeiffer.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three Types of Interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. Dalam D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (hlm. 22–38). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983065
Moore, M. G. (1999). American Journal of Distance Editorial: Distance education theory. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Rajeh, M. T., Abduljabbar, F. H., Alqahtani, S. M., Waly, F. J., Alnaami, I., Aljurayyan, A., Alzaman, N., Abduljabbar, F. H., Alqahtani, S. M., Waly, F. J., & Alnaami, I. (2021). Students ’ satisfaction and continued intention toward e-learning: A theory-based study. Medical Education Online, 26(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1961348
Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Sense of Community in Graduate Online Education: Contribution of Learner to Learner Interaction Community in Graduate Online. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1339
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1738–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014
Swan, K. (2010). Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: The importance of interaction. Education , Communication & Information, 2(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463631022000005016
Swan, K., & Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
Woods, R. H., & Baker, J. D. (2004). Interaction and Immediacy in Online Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.186
Xiao, J. (2017). Learner-content interaction in distance education: The weakest link in interaction research. Distance Education, 7919(April), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1298982
Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F.-H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic – online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2020.1824884
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Ridha, Muhammad Irfan Islamy, Agus Riwanda, Noor Hasanah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The right to publication of all journal material published on the Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan website is held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain the property of the author).
- The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution International (CC BY) license. This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
- Printed and electronic published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
