Pancasila dalam Pusaran Diskursus Liberalisme versus Komunitarisme

Authors

  • Otto Gusti Madung HAM dan Filsafat Politik di STFK Ledalero, Flores, Nusa Tenggara Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v13i2.768

Abstract

Abstract: This paper attempts to show that a democratic order is not built onthe procedural ethics as assumed by liberals, but it is required a substantiveethical foundation. The reason is the democratic system is not contained ofatomistic individuals without social relations. A democratic process always movesin a society characterized by social relations and the various formation pro-cesses of complex communities. Democracy is built on formal yet fragilecollective identity. In the context of Indonesia, Pancasila is an expression of thecollective identity. As a collective identity, Pancasila has no ends and always inthe process of being and find themselves in a new way. At the end of thepaper, two methods; deliberative and agonistic democracy method are pre-sented. These methods are offered by contemporary political philosophy inresolving conflicts of value in the middle of pluralism.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-25

How to Cite

Madung, O. G. (2016). Pancasila dalam Pusaran Diskursus Liberalisme versus Komunitarisme. Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora, 13(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v13i2.768

Issue

Section

Articles