ANALISIS LOGIS DAN EPISTEMOLOGIS ISTINBATH HUKUM BERBASIS ILMU DHARURI DAN NAZHARI

Authors

  • Zainal Pikri Fakultas Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi UIN Antasari Banjarmasin http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3020-3071
  • Agustini Agustini UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v19i2.5219

Keywords:

‘Ilm Nazharī, ‘Ilm Dharūrī, Logika, Epistemologi

Abstract

This article explores the construction of the definition of "fiqh" in several books of ushul fiqh of the mutakallimūn school by starting from an exploration of the classification of knowledge in Islamic philosophy and theology. Furthermore, this article identifies the implications of the classification of knowledge in theology, namely ‘ilm dharūrī (immediate knowledge) and ‘ilm nazharī (discursive knowledge) as the basis for the formation of ushul fiqh, with the main focus on the term "fiqh" in several books of ushul fiqh by mutakallimūn. In the final section, this article discusses two logical and epistemological aspects of the nazharī paradigm and analyzes the example of nazharī reasoning in usul fiqh from Al-Amidi in those two aspects. This article argues that logical and epistemological analysis within the nazharī paradigm can identify divine elements and human understanding in the steps producing Islamic law so that the distinction between syariah and fiqh can be clarified systematically.Artikel ini menelusuri konstruksi definisi “fiqh” dalam beberapa kitab ushul fiqh aliran mutakallimūn dengan memulai dari eksplorasi klasifikasi ilmu dalam filsafat Islam dan kalam. Selanjutnya artikel ini mengidentifikasi implikasi klasifikasi ilmu dalam kalam, yaitu ilmu dharūrī dan nazharī sebagai dasar dalam pembetukan ilmu ushul fiqh, dengan fokus utama pada istilah “fiqh” pada beberapa kitab ushul fiqh aliran mutakallimūn. Pada bagian akhir, artikel ini membahas dua aspek logis dan epistemologis dari paradigma ilmu nazharī dan menganalisis contoh penalaran nazharī dalam ushul fiqh dari Al-Amidi dari sisi kedua aspek ini. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa analisis logis dan epistemologis dengan paradigma ilmu nazharī dapat memilah unsur ilahi dan pemahaman manusia dalam langkah-langkah istinbāth hukum Islam sehingga pembedaan antara syariah dan fiqh dapat diklarifikasi secara sistematis. 

References

Abed, Shukri. Aristotelian Logic and the Arabic Language in Alfārābī. SUNY series, toward a comparative philosophy of religion. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press, 1991.

Abou El Fadl, Khaled. And God Knows the Soldiers: The Authoritative and Authoritarian in Islamic Discourses. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 2001.

Abrahamov, Binyamin. “Necessary Knowledge in Islamic Theology.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 20 (January 1, 1993): 20–32.

Adamson, Peter. Philosophy and Jurisprudence in the Islamic World. Philosophy in the Islamic world in context volume 1. Berlin Boston (Mass.): De Gruyter, 2019.

Āmidī, ʻAlī ibn Abī ʻAlī. Al-Iḥkām Fī Uṣūl al-Aḥkām. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Fikr, 1997.

Āmidī, ʻAlī ibn Abī ʻAlī, Aḥmad Muḥammad Mahdī, and Dār al-Kutub wa-al-Wathāʼiq al-Qawmīyah (Egypt). Markaz Taḥqīq al-Turāth. Abkār Al-Afkār Fī Uṣūl al-Dīn. 5 vols. al-Qāhirah: Maṭbaʻat Dār al-Kutub wa-al-Wathāʼiq al-Qawmīyah bi-al-Qāhirah, 2002.

Arfan, Abbas. “Peran Dan Pengaruh Filsafat Dan Logika Dalam Metode Istinbāth Hukum Islam.” Ulumuna 19, no. 1 (June 29, 2015): 93–110.

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: The International Inst. of Islamic Thought, 2008.

Audi, Robert. Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. 3rd ed. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2011.

Avicenna, and Farhang Zabeeh. Avicenna’s Treatise on Logic. : (A Concise Philosophical Encyclopaedia) and Autobiography. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1971.

Baiḍāwī, ʿAbdallāh Ibn-ʿUmar al-, and Šaʿbān Muḥammad Ismāʿīl. Minhāj al-wuṣūl ilā ʿilm al-uṣūl, 2008.

Calder, Norman. “Law, Islamic Philosophy Of.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2016. Accessed December 2, 2021. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/law-islamic-philosophy-of/v-1.

Dalhat, Yusuf. “The Concept of Al-Aql (Reason) in Islam.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 5, no. 9 (2015): 1.

Dedi, Syarial. “Ushul Fiqih Menurut Paradigma Filsafat Ilmu (Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, Dan Aksiologi).” Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (November 30, 2020): 289.

Fahr-ad-Din ar-Razi, Muhammad Ibn-`Umar., and Muhammad `Abd-al-Qadir. `Ata. al- Mahsul fi `ilm al-usul. 1 1. Bairut: Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiya, 1999.

Falah, Riza Zahriyal. “Filsafat Islam Dalam Ilmu Ushul Fiqih.” YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (December 1, 2015): 414–433.

Fanani, Muhyar. “Ilmu Ushul Fiqh (Kajian Ontologis Dan Aksiologis).” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 4, no. 2 (September 2, 2013): 197–208.

Feloussi, Messaoud. Madrasah Al-Mutatakallimīn Wa Manhajuha Fī Dirāsah Ushūl al-Fiqh. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rushd Nasyirūn, 2004.

Frank, R. M. “Knowledge and Taqlîd: The Foundations of Religious Belief in Classical Ashʿarism.” Journal of the American Oriental Society (1989): 37–62.

———. “Several Fundamental Assumptions of the Baṣra School of the Mu’tazila.” Studia Islamica (1971): 5–18.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Joel Weinsheimer, and Donald G. Marshall. Truth and Method. 2nd, rev. ed ed. Continuum impacts. London ; New York: Continuum, 2004.

Ghazzali. Shifa’ al-Ghalil Fi Bayan al-Shabah Wa l-Mukhil Wa-Masalik al-Ta’lil. Edited by Hamd al-Kabisi. Baghdad: Riasah Diwan al-Auqaf, 1971.

Hallaq, Wael B. “Logic, Formal Arguments and Formalization of Arguments in Sunnī Jurisprudence.” Arabica 37, no. 3 (1990): 315–358.

———. “Non-Analogical Arguments in Sunni Juridical Qiyās.” Arabica 36, no. 3 (1989): 286–306.

———. “The Development of Logical Structure in Sunni Legal Theory.” Der Islam: Der Islam: Journal of the History and Culture of the Middle East 64, no. 1 (1987): 42–67.

Iannone, A. Pablo. Dictionary of World Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2001.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. 3rd rev. and enl. Ed. Cambridge, UK: Islamic Texts Society, 2003.

Marmura, Michael E. “Ghazali’s Attitude to the Secular Sciences and Logic.” In Essays on Islamic Philosophy and Science, edited by George Fadlou Hourani, 100–11. Studies in Islamic philosophy and science. Albany, N.Y: State university of New York press, 1975.

Movahed, Zia. “Suhrawardi on Syllogisms.” Sophia Perennis 2 (2010).

Mumford, Stephen. “Metaphysics and Sport.” In Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Sport, edited by Mike McNamee and William J. Morgan, 274–286. 1st ed. Oxford & New York: Routledge, 2015.

Nasution, Hasan Bhakti. “Hubungan Ilmu Manthiq (Logika) Dengan Ushul Fiqh.” Aqlania 11, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 91.

Newman, Lex. “Ideas, Pictures, and the Directness of Perception in Descartes and Locke.” Philosophy Compass 4 (2009): 134–154.

Peters, J. R. T. M. God’s Created Speech : A Study in the Speculative Theology of the Muʻtazilî Qâdî l-Gudât Abûl-Hasan ʻAbd al-Jabbâr Bn Ahmad al-Hamadânî. Leyden: Brill, 1976.

Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʻUmar, Naṣīr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad Ṭūsī, and Ṭāhā ʻAbd al-Raʼūf Saʻd. Muḥaṣṣal Afkār Al-Mutaqaddimīn Wa-al-Mutaʼakhkhirīn Min al-ʻulamāʼ Wa-al-Ḥukamāʼ Wa-al-Mutakallimīn. Al-Ṭabʻah 1. Min turāth al-Rāzī. Bayrūt, Lubnān: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʻArabī, 1984.

Shihadeh, Ayman. “The Argument from Ignorance and Its Critics in Medieval Arabic Thought.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 23, no. 2 (September 2013): 171–220.

Sklare, David Eric. Samuel Ben Hofni Gaon and His Cultural World : Texts and Studies. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996.

Soroush, Abdolkarim. “The Evolution and Devolution of Religious Knowledge.” In Liberal Islam: A Source Book, edited by Charles Kurzman, 244–251. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Subki, Taqi al-Din `Ali ibn `Abd al-Kafi, Taj al-Din `Abd al-Wahhab ibn `Ali Subki, Sha`ban Muhammad. Isma`il, and `Abd Allah ibn `Umar Baydawi. Ibhaj fi sharh al-Minhaj : `alá Minhaj al-wusul ilá `ilm al-usul lil-qadi al-Baydawi al-mutawaffá sanat 685 H. Bayrut, Lubnan: Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyah, 1984.

Vinci, Thomas. “Immediacy.” In The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, edited by Robert Audi, 418–419. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Weiss, Bernard G., and International Institute of Islamic Thought. The Search for God’s Law : Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf al-Dīn al-Āmidī. Revised. Salt Lake City & Herndon, Va.: University Of Utah Press; International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Pikri, Z., & Agustini, A. (2021). ANALISIS LOGIS DAN EPISTEMOLOGIS ISTINBATH HUKUM BERBASIS ILMU DHARURI DAN NAZHARI. Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora, 19(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v19i2.5219

Issue

Section

Articles