NUANSA FIQIH DALAM PEMIKIRAN TEOLOGI SYEKH MUHAMMAD ARSYAD AL-BANJARI PADA RISALAH TUHFAT AL-RÂGHIBÎN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v19i1.4938Keywords:
Arsyad al-Banjari, Tuhfat al-Râghibîn, aqidah, Syariah, fiqihAbstract
This paper examines the theological thoughts of Sheikh Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari in Tuhfat al-Râghibîn. Although it is a treatise on theology that actually deals with theoretical aspects (nazharî), it discusses extensively practical aspects (‘amalî). With Arsyad al-Banjari's background as an expert in Islamic law, these practical aspects are described using some notions developed in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). As a result, the nuances of fiqh are so evident in this treatise. This can be observed from the use of deontic modalities and argumentation models of fiqh to explain issues related to theology. Moreover, this treatise follows the deep structure of the so-called al-hukm al-wadh‘î in Islamic law to describe the concept of faith.Paper ini menganalisa pemikiran teologi Syekh Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari dalam Tuhfat al-Râghibîn. Walaupun ini risalah tentang akidah yang sebenarnya membahas aspek-aspek teoritis (nazharî), tapi ia banyak mendiskusikan aspek-aspek praktis (‘amalî). Dengan latar belakang Arsyad al-Banjari sebagai seorang ahli fiqih, maka aspek-aspek praktis ini diuraikan dengan menuggunakan beberapa ide yang dikembangkan dalam yurisprudensi Islam (fiqih). Alhasil, nuansa fiqih sangat kentara dalam risalah ini. Ini terlihat dari penggunaan modalitas deontik dan model argumentasi fiqih untuk menguraikan persoalan-persoalan yang terkait dengan aqidah. Lebih dari itu, risalah ini mengikuti struktur dalam (deep structure) hukum wadh‘î dalam fiqih untuk menjelaskan konsep keimanan.References
‘Âyish, ‘Abd al-Fattâh dan Qaishar. Mu‘jam al-Adibbâ’ min ‘Asr al-Jâhilî hattâ sana 2002. Vol. 4. Beirut: Dâr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya, 2003
Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. Strukturalisme Levi-Strauss: Mitos dan Karya Sastra. Yogyakarta: Galang Press, 2001.
Arsyad al-Banjari, Tuhfat al-Râghibîn, Ed. Mahmud Siddiq. Teluk Selong, Martapura, 1983.
Azra, Azyumardi. The Origins of Islamic reformism in Southeast Asia: networks of Malay-Indonesian and Middle Eastern ‘Ulamâ’ in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Crows Nest; Honolulu: Allen & Unwin; University of Hawai’i Press, 2004.
El-Muhammady, Muhammad ‘Uthman. “Aqidah Ahli Sunnah Wal-Jamaah menurut Syeikh Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari”. Dalam Abdul Rahman Abdullah, Biografi Agung Sheikh Arshad al-Banjari. Shah Alam, Selangor: Karya Bestari, 2016.
Esposito, Jhon L. & Natana J. Delong-Bas, Shariah: What Everyone needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
al-Ghazâlî, Abû Hâmid. Al-Mustashfâ min ‘Ilm al-Ushûl. Bûlâq: al-Mathba’a al-Amîrîyya, 1324H/1906.
Halidi,Yusuf. Ulama Besar Kalimantan Selatan Syekh Arsyad al-Banjari. Surabaya: al-Ikhsan, 1968.
Hasan, Norhaidi. “The Tuhfat al-Raghibin: The Work of Abdul Samad al-Palimbani or Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari?” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (BKI) 163-1, 2007.
Ibn Hazm, Al-Ihkâm fî Ushûl al-Ahkâm. vol. 3, Ed. Ahmad Muhammad Shâkir. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat al-Saʿâda,1926-1930
Iqbal, Muhammad dan Shahid Rahman “Arsyad Al-Banjari’s Dialectical Model for Integrating Indonesian Traditional Uses into Islamic Law”, Argumentation, Vol. 35,2021.
al-Jabartî, ‘Abd al-Rahman. Târîkh ‘Ajâ’ib al-Âthâr fî al-Tarâjum wa al-Akhbâr, vol.1. Beirut: Dâr al-Jîl, 1998
al-Jâbî, Bassâm ‘Abd al-Wahâb. “Tarjamah Muhammad ibn Sulaymân al-Kurdî/al-Kardî”. Dalam Muhammad b. al-Kurdî, al-Fawâ’id al-Madaniyya. Libanon: Dâr Nûr al-SHabâh and al-Jaffân wa al-Jâbî, 2011.
Jahja, Zurkani. “Pemikiran Syeikh Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari dalam Bidang Tauhid”. Dalam Abdul Rahman Abdullah, Biografi Agung Sheikh Arshad al-Banjari. Dalam Abdul Rahman Abdullah, Biografi Agung Sheikh Arshad al-Banjari. Shah Alam, Selangor: Karya Bestari, 2016.
al-Juwaynî, Imâm al-Haramayn. Al-Waraqât fî Ushûl a-Fiqh. On the margin of al-Mahallî’s Sharh al-Waraqât. Hyderabad: Markaz Tau'iyya al-Fiqh al-Islâmî, 1955.
Kahâla, ‘Umar Ridhâ. Mu‘jam al-Mu’allifîn; Tarâjum Mu’alifî al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyya. Vol.2. Beirut: Mu’assasa al-Risâla, 1993
Mujiburrahman, M. Rusydi, Muhammad Iqbal & Adi Hatim, Pemikiran Teologi Syekh Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari dalam Kitab Hidâyat al-Mustarsyidîn, UIN Antasari Banjarmasin, Banjarmasin, 2021.
Mujiburrahman. “Islamic Theological Texts and Contexts in Banjarese Society: An Overview of the Existing Studies”. Southeast Asian Studies, 3/3, 2014.
Munadi, Fathullah. Teks dan Naskah Sabîl al-Muhtadîn: Kajian Filologi atas Karya Syekh Muhammad Arsyad. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/41958304/teks_dan_naskah_sab%c4%aal_al_muhtad%c4%aan_kajian_filologi_atas_karya_syekh_muhammad_arsyad.
Nasution, Harun. Islam Ditinjau dari Berbagai Aspeknya, Jilid 2. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2002.
Nasution, Harun. Teologi Islam. Jakarta: UI-Press, 1986.
Noor, Irfan. “Visi Spiritual Masyarakat Banjar”, Al-Banjari, Vol. 12 No. 2 Juli 2013.
Noor, Muhammad Iqbal. “Nalar Keislaman Urang Banjar”, Al-Banjari, Vol.10. No.2, 2011.
Perlmann, Moshe. “Shaykh al-Damanhûrî against the churches of Cairo (1739)”. Actas IV Congresso de Estudos Arabes e Islâmicos: Coimbra-Lisboa, 1 a 8 de ´ setembro de 1968. Leiden: Brill, 1971).
Piaget, Jean. Strukturalisme, terj. Hermoyo. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 1995.
Rahman, Shahid., Farid Zidani, & Walter E. Young, “Ibn Hazm on Heteronomous Imperative. Landmark in the History of the Logical Analysis of Legal Norms”. Dalam P. McNamara, A. Jones, & M. Brown, Deontic Logic. Synthese Library-Springer.Rahman, 2020.
Rahman, Shahid., J. G. Granström, A. Farjami, “Legal Reasoning and Some Logic After All. The Lessons of the Elders”. Dalam D. Gabbay, L. Magnani, W. Park, & A.-V. Pietarinen, Natural Arguments. A Tribute to John Woods. London: CollegePublications, 2019.
Rusydi, M. “Analisis atas Tuhfah ar-Râghibîn Karya Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari” Al-Banjari, Vol. 9 No.1, 2010.
_________, “Ideologi dan Epistemologi Kitab Tuhfah ar-Râghibîn Karya Muhammad Arshad al-Banjari, Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. 8, No.2, 2014.
al-Shîrâzî, Abû Ishâq. Al-Lumaʻ fî Ushûl al-Fiqh. Ed. Muḥyī al-Dīn Dīb Mustū and Yūsuf ʻAlī Badīwī. Damascus; Beirut: Dār al-Kalam al-Ṭayyib; Dâr Ibn Kathîr, 1995.
_________, Al-Maʿûna fî al-Jadal. Ed. ʻAlî b. ʿAbd al-ʿAzîz al-ʿUmayrînî. Al-SHafâh, Kuwait: Manshûrât Markaz al-Makhthûthât wa-al-Turâth, 1987.
Steenbrink, K. A. Beberapa Aspek tentang Islam di Indonesia Abad ke19. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1984.
Syukur, Aswadie. “Pemikiran Syeikh Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari dalam Bidang Fiqh (1); Kitab Sabil al-Muhtadin”. Dalam Abdul Rahman Abdullah, Biografi Agung Sheikh Arshad al-Banjari. Shah Alam, Selangor: Karya Bestari, 2016.
_________, Naskah Risalah Tuhfatur Raghibin. Laporan Penelitian IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin, 1990
van Bruinessen, M. “Kurdish `Ulama and their Indonesian disciples" [revised version of: "The impact of Kurdish `ulama on Indonesian Islam"]”. Les annales de l'autre Islam, 5, 1998.
Yusran, Study Tentang Risalah Tuhfatur Raghibin, Skripsi, Fakultas Ushuluddin IAIN Antasari, Banjarmasin, 1988
al-Zakarsyî, Abû ‘Abdillah. al-Bahr al-Muhîth fî Ushûl al-Fiqh, Jilid 2. Dar al-Kutubî, 1994
al-Zarkalî, Khair al-Dîn. al-A’lâm. vol.4. Beirut: Dâr al-‘Ilm li al-Malâyîn, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
