NATURALISASI FILSAFAT ISLAM  DALAM PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI

Ridhatullah Assyabani

doi:10.18592/khazanah.v18i2.3563

Authors

Ridhatullah Assyabani Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Alqur'an (STIQ) Amuntai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v18i2.3563

Keywords:

al-Ghazali’s thought, naturalizatation, Islamic philosophy

Abstract

The thought of al-Ghazali as outlined in Tahafut al-Falasifah has been a controversy for centuries and even today it has become a debate mainly related to the view of al-Ghazali who deconstructed the building of philosophy in Islam resulting in old wounds. In the end, various negative stigmas directed at al-Ghazali. However, whether the work of al-Ghazali, as many have suspected, has resulted in haunting in philosophy or just the opposite? By re-reading al-Ghazali as a traditionalist scholar and reviewing the general opinion which says that Tahafut al-Falasifah is a representation of the conflict between philosophy and dogma; or between orthodoxy and heterodoxy, this paper will show that al-Ghazali has an important role in naturalizing science and philosophy in the frame of Islamic theology.Pemikiran al-Ghazali yang tertuang pada Tahafut al-Falasifah menjadi kontroversi selama berabad-abad, bahkan hingga saat ini menjadi perdebatan terutama terkait dengan pandangan al-Ghazali yang mendekonstruksi bangunan filsafat dalam Islam mengakibatkan luka lama. Pada akhirnya berbagai macam stigma negatif yang ditujukan kepada al-Ghazali. Namun, apakah karya al-Ghazali tersebut seperti banyak yang diduga, telah mengakibatkan kehancuran dalam fisafat atau justru sebaliknya? Dengan melakukan pembacaan ulang terhadap al-Ghazali sebagai ulama tradisionalis dan meninjau pendapat umum yang mengatakan bahwa Tahafut al-Falasifah merupakan representasi konflik antara filsafat dan dogma; atau antara ortodoksi dan heterodoksi, tulisan ini akan memperlihatkan bahwa al-Ghazali memiliki peran penting dalam melakukan naturalisasi filsafat dalam bingkai teologi Islam.

References

Abd. Moqsith Ghazali, “Corak Tasawuf al-Ghazali dan Relevansinya Dalam Konteks Sekarang,” dalam Al-Tahrir, Vol. 13, No. 1 Mei 2013

Ahmad Atabik, “Telaah Pemikiran al-Ghazali tentang Filsafat” dalam Fikrah, Vol. 2, No. 1, Juni 2014.

Aksin Wijaya, Nalar Kritis Epistemologi Islam: Membincang Dialog Kritis Para Kritikus Muslim: al-Ghazali, Ibn Rusd, Thah Husein, Muhammad Abid al-Jabiri (Yogayakarta: Teras, 2014)

Al-Akiti, M. Afifi. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Falsafa: Al-Ghazālī’s Madnūn, Tahāfut, and Maqāsid, with Particular Attention to Their Falsafī Treatments of God’s Knowledge of Temporal Events,” dalam Y. Tzvi Langermann (ed.), Avicenna and His Legacy: A Golden Age of Science and Philosophy (Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2009), 51-100.

Alexander Treiger, Inspired Knowledge in Islamic Thought: al-Ghazali’s Theory of Mystical Cognition and it’s Avicennian Foundation,(New York: Routledge, 2012)

Al-Ghazālī, Abū Hāmid. Al-Iqtishād fī’l-Iʻtiqād, diedit oleh Ibrāhīm A. Çubukçu dan Huseyin Atay. Ankara: Nur Matbaasi, 1962.

_______. Al-Munqidz min al-Dhalāl / Erreur et delivrance, edisi dwibahasa Arab-Prancis yang diedit dan diterjemahkan oleh Farid Jabre. Beirut: Commission Libanaise pour la Traduction des Chefs-d’Oeuvre, 1969.

_______. Fayshal al-Tafriqah bayna’l-Islām wa al-Zandaqah, diedit oleh Mahmūd Bījū. Damaskus: al-Mathba‘ah al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1993.

_______. Ihyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn, 5 jilid. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1982.

_______. The First Islamic Reviver: Abū Hāmid al-Ghazālī and His Revival of the Religious Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

_______. The Incoherence of the Philosophers / Tahāfut al-Falāsifah, edisi dwibahasa Inggris-Arab yang diedit dan diterjemahkan oleh Michael E. Marmura. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 2000.

_______. The Niche of Lights / Misykāt al-Anwār, edisi dwibahasa Inggris-Arab yang diedit dan diterjemahkan oleh David Buchman. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1998.

Al-Jābirī, Muhammad ‘Ābid. Takwīn al-‘Aql al-‘Arabī. Beirut: Markaz Dirāsāt al-Wahdat al-‘Arabiyyah, 1989.

Badarussyamsi, “Tasawuf al-Ghazali dan Jalaluddin Rumi,” dalam Tajdid, Vol 13, No 1, 2014

Badrus, “Pemikiran Al-Ghazali dalam Tasawuf,” dalam Tribakti, Volume 14 No.1 Januari 2005

Ebrahim Moosa, Ghazali and the Poeticsof Imagination, (The University of North Carolina Press, 2005)

Fakhry, Majid. A History of Islamic Philosophy, 3rd edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.

Frank Griffel, “‘... And the Killing of Someone Who Upholds These Convictions is Obligatory!’ Religious Law and the Assumed Disappearance of Philosophy in Islam,” dalam Andreas Speer dan Guy Guldentops (ed.), Das Gesets (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014)

_______. “Preface” dalam buku. Frank Griffel (ed.), Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghazali Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary. Vol. 2, (Brill, Leiden, 2016)

_______. Al-Ghazalı’s Philosophical Theology (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2009)

Garden, Kenneth. “Coming Down from the Mountaintop: Al-Ghazālī’s Autobiographical Writings in Context,” The Muslim World, 101 (2011), 581-596.

Georges Tamer, “Preface” dalam buku. Georges Tamer (ed.), Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghazali Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary. Vol. I, (Brill, Leiden, 2015)

Ghazali Munir, “Kritik al-Ghazali Terhadap Para Filosof” dalam Teologia, Volume 25, Nomor 1, Januari-Juni 2014.

Irwan Masduqi, “Kritik Nalar Arab dalam Perspektif Abid al-Jabiri” dalam Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, Vol 20 no. 1, 2013

Jamhari, “Al-Ghazali dan Oposisinya terhadap Filsafat”, dalam Jurnal Ilmu Agama, vol. 16, No. 1, Desember 2015.

Janssens, Jules. “al-Ghazali Between Philosophy (Falasifa) and Sufism (Tasawuf): His Complex Attitude in the Marvels of the Heart (Ajaib al-Qalb) of the Ihya’ Ulum al-Din,” dalam The Muslim World, Volume 101, Oktober 2011

_______. “Al-Ghazzālī’s Tahāfut: Is It Really a Rejection of Ibn Sīnā’s Philosophy?,” Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2001), 1-17.

Kenneth Garden, “Coming Down from the Mountaintop: Al-Ghazali’s Autobiographical Writings in Context,” dalam The Muslim World, 101 (2011)

M. Amin Abdullah, Filsafat Etika Islam, Antara al-Ghazali dan Kant (Bandung, Mizan, 2002)

M. Faisol, “Struktur Nalar Arab-Islam Menurut Abid al=Jabiri” dalam Jurnal Tsaqafah, Vol 6, No. 2, tahun 2010.

Marmura, Michael E. “Al-Ghazālī’s Second Causal Theory in the 17th Discussion of his Tahāfut,” dalam Parviz Morewedge (ed.), Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism (Delmar, N.Y.: Caravan Books, 1981), 85-112.

Mas’udi, “Menyingkap Hubungan Agama dan Filsafat: Mereda Kesesatan Filsafat al-Ghazali, Merespon Keterhubungan Filsafat dan Agama Ibnu Rusd” dalam Jurnal Penelitian, vol. 7, No. 2, Agustus 2013.

Omer Michaelis, ““Even of the Philosophers”: Taqlid in Maimonides’ Guide of the Perplexed and its Sources” dalam A Journal of Jewish Philosophy & Kabbalah, No. 83, 2017

Sabra, A.I. “The Appropriation and Subsequent Naturalization of Greek Sciences in Medieval Islam: A Preliminary Statement,” History of Science, 25 (1987), 223-243.

Scott Michael Girdner “Ghazali’s Hermeneutics and Their Reception in Jewish Tradition Mishkat al-Anwar (The Niche of Lights) and Maimonides’ Shemonah Peraqim (Eight Chapters)” dalam buku. Georges Tamer (ed.), Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghazali Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary. Vol. I, (Brill, Leiden, 2015)

William M. Watt, Islamic Philosophy and Theology, 117. Lihat juga William M. Watt, The Faith and Practice of al-Ghazali, Serie XIII of Ethical and Religious Classics of East and West (London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd, 1953)

_______,” The Authenticity of the Works Attributed to al-Ghazali” dalam The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland,No. 1/2 (Apr., 1952)

Zurkani Jahja, Teologi al-Ghazali: Pendekatan Metodology, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1996)