INTEGRATING KHILAFAH AND DEMOCRACY THROUGH PROPHETIC SOCIAL SCIENCE: TOWARD AN ETHICAL FRAMEWORK OF ISLAMIC GOVERNANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v23i1.18168Keywords:
Khilafah, Democracy, Thematic Interpretation, Prophetic Social ScienceAbstract
Khilafah and democracy are two opposing poles according to many researchers. This assessment is actually reductive, because reading the two terms from one side, namely both as systems and forms of government. Democracy, as a system of government, is highly context-dependent, manifesting in various forms such as liberal, direct, or participatory democracy in various societies. Defenders of the caliphate are mistaken in interpreting the word caliphate mentioned in the Qur'an. Meanwhile, the plaintiffs of the caliphate agree with the assumption of the defense group. As a result, the assumption that the caliphate is a system and form of government continues to roll until it covers the original meaning of the caliphate itself. This article will clear the term caliphate from the pile of political tendencies and then reveal its original meaning. For that, the author proposes two problem formulations. First, what is the true meaning of the caliphate ? Second, how to reconcile the caliphate in a political sense with democracy ? In order to dissect the two problem formulations, the author will adopt two analytical knives, namely the thematic interpretation method and Kuntowijoyo's Prophetic Social Science. Thematic interpretation will reveal the basic meaning of the caliphate, while Kuntowijoyo's prophetic social science will synthesize the caliphate and democracy. This research will produce two conclusions. First, the caliphate is not a system and form of state, but rather a divine character that embodies the will to imitate God and personal responsibility for that character. Second, the caliphate manifests itself as an idea and movement based on science, not just doctrine and belief.
References
’ArabÄ«, Ibn. Al-FutūḥÄt Al-Makkiyyah Vol. 7. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, n.d.
Ä€bÄdÄ«, Muḥammad al-FayrÅ«z. Al-QÄmÅ«s Al-Muḥīá¹. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2013.
Abdussalam, Izzuddin bin. Kitab Dan Terjemah Syajarat Al-Ma’Ärif Wa Al-AḥwÄl Wa á¹¢Äliḥ Al-AqwÄl Wa Al-A’mÄl: Tuntunan Qur’an Mengihsankan Pikiran, Perkataan Dan Perbuatan. Jakarta Selatan: Qaf Media Kreativa, 2020.
Agensky, Jonathan C. “Recognizing Religion: Politics, History, And The ‘Long 19th Century.’†European Journal of International Relations 23, no. 4 (2021): 729–55.
Ahmed, Amir Khan. “A Philosophical Exploration of Spiritual Values and Their Contribution to Shaping Humanity.†MEΘEXIS Journal of Research in Values and Spirituality III, no. II (2023): 130–50. doi:10.71210/mjrvs.5.a.8.
Al-BÄqÄ«, Muḥammad Fu’Äd ’Abd. Al-Mu’jam Al-Mufahras Li AlfÄẓ Al-Qur’Än. Kairo: Maá¹ba’at DÄr al-Kutub al-Miá¹£riyyah, 1364.
Al-BiqÄ’ī, Burḥan al-DÄ«n AbÅ« al-Ḥasan IbrÄhÄ«m. Naẓm Al-Durar FÄ« TanÄsub Al-Ä€yÄt Wa Al-Suwar Vol. 7. Kairo: DÄr al-KitÄb al-IslÄmÄ«, n.d.
Al-DÄmaghÄnÄ«, Ḥusayn. QÄmÅ«s Al-Qur’Än Aw Iá¹£lÄḥ Al-WujÅ«h Wa Al-NazÄ’ir FÄ« Al-Qur’Än Al-KarÄ«m. Beirut: DÄr al-’Ilm li al-MalÄyÄ«n, 1983.
Al-Fayyadl, Muhammad. “Teologi Negatif Ibn ’Arabi: Sebuah Kritik Atas Metafisika Ketuhanan.†UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2009.
Al-Iá¹£fahÄnÄ«, Al-RÄghib. MufradÄt AlfÄẓ Al-Qur’Än. Damaskus: DÄr al-Qalam, 2009.
Al-Jumal, Ḥasan ’Izz al-DÄ«n. Mu’jam Wa TafsÄ«r LughawÄ« Li KalimÄt Al-Qur’Än Vol. 2. Riyadl: al-Hay’ah al-Miá¹£riyyah al-Ä€mmah li al-KitÄb, 2005.
Al-MaqdisÄ«, Ä€lamÄ« ZÄdah Fayá¸ullÄh al-ḤasanÄ«. Fatḥ Al-RaḥmÄn Li ṬÄlib Ä€yÄt Al-Qur’Än. Beirut: al-Maá¹ba’ah al-Ahliyyah, 1323.
Al-Qurá¹ubÄ«, AbÅ« ’AbdillÄh Muḥammad. Al-JÄmi’ Li AḥkÄm Al-Qur’Än Wa Al-Mubayyin Li MÄ Taá¸ammanahÅ« Min Al-Sunnah Wa Ä€y Al-FurqÄn Vol. 17. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-RisÄlah, 2006.
Al-RÄzÄ«, Fakhr al-DÄ«n. Al-TafsÄ«r Al-KabÄ«r Wa MafÄtīḥ Al-Ghayb Vol. 14. Beirut: DÄr al-Fikr, 1981.
Al-Sabt, KhÄlid ibn ’UṡmÄn. QawÄ’id Al-TafsÄ«r: Jam’an Wa DirÄsatan. DÄr Ibn ’AffÄn, n.d.
Al-SuyÅ«á¹Ä«, JalÄl al-DÄ«n ‘Abd al-RaḥmÄn. Al-ItqÄn FÄ« ’UlÅ«m Al-Qur’Än Vol. 1. Beirut: DÄr al-Fikr, 1979.
Al-SuyÅ«á¹Ä«, JalÄl al-DÄ«n ’Abd al-RaḥmÄn. Al-Durr Al-Manṡūr FÄ« Al-TafsÄ«r Bi Al-Ma’ṡūr Vol. 11. Kairo: Markaz Hajr li al-Buḥūṡ wa al-DirÄsÄt al-’Arabiyyah wa al-IslÄmiyyah, 2003.
Al-ṬabarÄ«, AbÅ« Ja’far Muḥammad. JÄmi’ Al-BayÄn ’an Ta’wÄ«l Ä€y Al-Qur’Än Vol. 20. Beirut: Markaz li al-Buḥūṡ wa al-DirÄsÄt al-’Arabiyyah wa al-IslÄmiyyah bi DÄr Hajr, 2001.
Al-ZamakhsyarÄ«, AbÅ« al-QÄsim MaḥmÅ«d. Al-KasysyÄf ’an ḤaqÄ’iq GhawÄmiḠAl-TanzÄ«l Wa ’UyÅ«n Al-AqÄwÄ«l FÄ« WujÅ«h Al-Ta’wÄ«l Vol. 2. Riyadl: Maktabat al-’UbaykÄn, 1998.
Al-ZarkasyÄ«. Al-BurhÄn FÄ« ‘UlÅ«m Al-Qur’Ān Vol. 1. Beirut: DÄr al-Fikr, 2001.
Dzimar, Arsyad, and Ezhar Ghazlan. “The Urgency of Implementing Siyasah Syar’iyyah Values in National Law-Making: Harmonizing Islamic Governance Principles with Constitutional Democracy.†SYARIAT: Akhwal Syaksiyah, Jinayah, Siyasah and Muamalah 1, no. 4 (2024): 172–79. doi:10.35335/2frs5098.
Fuadi, Azrian Isyfaul. “Reconfiguring Religious Authority and Ethical Governance in Islamic Political Thought: A Comparative Literature Review.†Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 3 (2024): 136–48. doi:10.61194/ijis.v2i3.605.
Geertz, Clifford. Agama Jawa: Santri, Abangan, Priyayi Dalam Kebudayaan Jawa. Edisi ke-2. Depok: Komunitas Bambu, 2014.
Hallaq, Wael B. “Qur’anic Constitutionalism and Moral Governmentality: Further Notes on the Founding Principles of Islamic Society and Polity.†Comparative Islamic Studies 8, no. 1–2 (2014): 1–52. doi:10.1558/cis.v8i1-2.1.
Hamzah, Adil Aiman. “An Analysis of the Relationship Between Executive Power and Islamic Law in Democratic States.†SYARIAT: Akhwal Syaksiyah, Jinayah, Siyasah and Muamalah 2, no. 1 (2025): 8–15. doi:10.35335/z0xezq29.
ḤanafÄ«, Ḥasan. Min Al-‘AqÄ«dah IlÄ Al-á¹ awrah 5 Volume. Beirut: DÄr al-TanwÄ«r li al-ṬibÄ’ah wa al-Nasyr dan al-Markaz al-á¹ aqÄfÄ« al-‘ArabÄ« li al-ṬibÄ’ah wa al-Nasyr, 1988.
Harari, Yuval Noah. Homo Deus: Masa Depan Umat Manusia. Tangerang Selatan: Alvabet, 2018.
Kaṡīr, Ibn. TafsÄ«r Al-Qur’Än Al-’Aẓīm Vol. 1. Jizah: Mu’assasat Qurá¹ubah bekerja sama dengan Maktabat AwlÄd al-Syaykh li al-TurÄṡ, 2000.
Masduha. Al-Alfaazh: Buku Pintar Memahami Kata-Kata Dalam Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2017.
Masyah, Syarif Hade. “Konsepsi Politik Khalifah Pada Era Khulafa Al-Rasyidin (Tinjauan Semantik Terhadap Term ‘Khilafah’).†Buletin Al-Turas, 2002. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/al-turats/article/view/4090%0Ahttp://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/al-turats/article/download/4090/2907.
Masyhudi. Kepemimpinan/Leadership Dalam Islam. Semarang: RSI Sultan Agung Islamic Teaching Hospital, n.d.
Mietzner, Marcus, and Burhanuddin Muhtadi. “Explaining the 2016 Islamist Mobilisation in Indonesia: Religious Intolerance, Militant Groups and the Politics of Accommodation.†Asian Studies Review 42, no. 3 (2018): 479–97. doi:10.1080/10357823.2018.1473335.
Munawwir, Ahmad Warson. Kamus Al-Munawwir: Arab-Indonesia Terlengkap. Surabaya: Pustaka Progresif, 1997.
N.A Baiquni, I.A Syawaqi dan R.A. Azis. Indeks Al-Qur’an: Cara Mencari Ayat Al-Qur’an. Surabaya: Arkola, 1996.
Rose, Nikolas, and Peter Miller. “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government.†New Critical Writings in Political Sociology: Volume One: Power, State and Inequality 43, no. 2 (2017): 255–87. doi:10.4324/9781315094021-9.
Rozi, Ahmad Bahrur. “Penerapan Syari’ah Di Negara Modern (Analisis Ijtihad Pemikiran Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im).†AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 10, no. 2 (2016): 359–92. doi:10.19105/al-lhkam.v10i2.734.
Saeed, Abdullah. “Trends in Contemporary Islam: A Preliminary Attempt at a Classification 97 (July 2007).†The Muslim World 97 (2007).
Saumantri, Theguh. “Pluralisme Dan Inklusivitas Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural Perspektif Pemikiran Tariq Ramadan.†Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 9, no. 1 (2023): 135. doi:10.31332/zjpi.v9i1.5899.
Supriyadi, Ujang. “Yusuf Al-Qardhawi ’ S Thoughts And Implementation To Indonesian Society.†Syntax Transformation 4, no. 12 (2023): 19–34.
Zaim, Muntaha Artalim. “The Modern Indonesian Experience in Coexistence between Muslims and Others: Presentation and Evaluation.†Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 13, no. 1 (2024): 20–33. doi:10.24252/al-daulah.v13i1.48650.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Novianta Budi Surana, Riko Wijaya, Ibnu Azka, Fathur Baldan Haramain

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.














