URGENCY CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES PARADIGM FOR THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE DIVORCE CASE

Nita Triana

Abstract


This research describes the protection of women victims of domestic violence in divorce cases. Domestic violence victims are hidden in divorce cases in the Religious Courts. The positivistic paradigm adopted by the Judges gives less protection to victims of domestic violence. The method used in this study is a qualitative method, a type of doctrinal legal research with a socio-legal  approach. Domestic violence victims in the Religious Courts need a new paradigm to provide protection for victims of domestic violence. Religious Court Judges who have a positivistic paradigm see the law as a book (act). The judge in examining the domestic violence in divorce only adheres to the law relating to marriage, namely Law No. 1 of 1974 and Compilation of Islamic Law. Paradigm of Critical Legal Studies. build critical awareness in law enforcement by improving the legal system and carrying out a reformation in the institutions responsible for the protection of victims of domestic violence, one of which is the Religious Courts. Also consider the PKDRT Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the elimination of domestic violence even covering legal culture of family, community, health and psychological.


Keywords


Paradigm, Critical Legal Studies, Victims, Domestic Violence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonim. Pedoman Perilaku Hakim (Code of Conduct) Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. 2018

Ester Lianawati, . Konflik Dalam Rumah Tangga Keadilan & Kepedulian Proses Hukum KDRT Prespektif Psikologis Feminis. Paradigma Indonesia, Yogyakarta 2009.

Fakih Mansour, Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2003

Friedman.M.Lawrence. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York, Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.

Harahap M. Yahya, Kedudukan kewenangan dan acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Pustaka karsuni, 1990),

Irianto Sulistyowati; Antonius Cahyadi; Runtuhnya Sekat Perdata dan Pidana Studi Peradilan Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan, Penerbit yayasan Obor. Jakarta 2008.

J. Chambliss William and Robert B. Seidman , Law, Power and Order, Philipine, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1971.

Manan A dan Fauzan, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Peradilan Agama. : Rajawali Pers, Jakarta. 2000.

RahardjoSatjipto Hukum Progresif – Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia, Yogyakarta.Genta Publishing. 2009

______________, Sekitar Hakim yang Memutus, Semarang . Kumpulan Tulisan Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum .UNDIP, 2009

Tamanaha Z. Brian. On the Rule of Law,New York: Cambridge University Press.2004

_______________ A Concise Guide to The Rule of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper, 07-0082, New York, St John University School of Law 2007

Unger M Roberto Law in Modern Society. Harvard: Harvard University Press. 1977

Unger M Roberto, Teori Hukum Kritis: Kajian Tentang Posisi Hukum Dalam Masyarakat Modern. Bandung, Nusa Media, 2008,

Strauss and J Corbin, Busir, Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedure and Techniques, London: Sage Publication, 1990.

Tanya L Bernard, dkk, Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi , Yogya:Genta Publishing, 2013

Valerine, J.L.K., Metode Penelitian Hukum: Kumpulan Bahan Bacaan untuk Program S2 dan S3 (Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana FHUI, 2014

Brickell Khaterine , Clouding the Judgment of Domestic Violence Law: Victim Blaming by Institutional Stakeholders in Cambodia, Journal Of InterpersonaViolence . Publish by Sage. May 2017. 32(9)

Danardono.Donny, Critical Legal Studies: Posisi Teori dan Kritik, Kisi Hukum Vol 14, No 1 2015

Irianto Sulistyowati dan Sidharta, Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi, Ed, (Jakarta:Yayasan Pustaka Obor-JHMP FHUI, 2013)

Syamsudin. M. Rekonstruksi Pola Pikir Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Korupsi Berbasis Hukum Progresif, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum.Vol.11 No.1. Januari.2011 . UNSOED Purwokerto. 2011

Suteki, Kebijakan Tidak Menegakan Hukum (Non Enforcement Of Law) Demi Pemuliaan Keadilan Substantif, Pidato Pengukuhan dalam Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam bidang Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.UNDIP.2010

Triana Nita. Progresifitas Hakim dalam Dinamika Positivisasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia,Al manahij Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam. STAIN Purwokerto, Vol.V No.2,Juli .2011

Grafik dimuat dalam Catatan Tahunan (CATAHU) 2017 (https://www.komnasperempuan.go.id, di unduh 18 agustus 2018 )

Adhitya Himawan dan Lili Handayani - 2017, Pengaduan Kasus di Jakarta ke LBH APIK https://www.suara.com/news/.../2017-pengaduan-kasus-di-jakarta-kelbh-apik, diunduh 18 agustus 2018

Konstitusi Undang Undang Dasar 1945 (Constitution of 1945)

Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (Law. No. 1 of 1974 concerning marriage)

Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Presidential Instruction No.1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law)

Undang-Undang No.7 Tahun 1984 tentang Pengesahan Konvensi Mengenai Penghapusan Segala Bentuk Diskriminasi Terhadap Wanita. (Law No.7 of 1984 concerning Ratification of the Convention concerning the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women)

Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (UU no. 23 of 2004 concerning Elimination of Domestic Violence)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/sy.v18i2.2276

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Nita Triana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran

Indexed By :

                 No automatic alt text available.
 
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.