Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal PTK dan Pendidikan is about journal article classroom research and school research. Journal PTK&Pendidikan article for teacher and lecture.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Article this review mitra bestari and the publish is standart journal PTK dan Pendidikan.

Blind review the article don't see the editor and the reviewer.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

More...

 

Publication Fee

Author free charge for submission, editing, or publication.

 

Frequency Publication

Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan publish on twice the year is Januari and Desember

 

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman is a peer reviews journal, publish twice in year, print and online publish. Islamica published by Fakultas Tarbiyah UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing articles in Theosophy, including writers, editors council, bestari partners and publishers. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guidelines for Publication

Theosophical Publishing articles is an important building in the development of a coherent network of knowledge and respected. This is a direct reflection of the quality of work of the authors and the institutions that support them. The articles were reviewed to support and contain the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected of all the parties involved in publishing, namely: author, editor of the journal, smart partners, publishers and the public.

Fakultas Tarbiyah UIN Antasari Banjarmasin as the publisher responsible for guarding all stages Islamica publishing seriously and recognizes the ethical responsibilities and other responsibilities. Institutions other than committed to ensure that the print ads and other commercial income has no impact or influence on editorial decisions, is also committed to assist communication with journal managers and / or issuer to another, if deemed useful and necessary.

Dicision of Publication

Islamica editor responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted should be published . Validation of the work and the centrality of the researcher and the reader should always encourage these decisions. The editor can be guided by the policies of the board of editors of journals and restricted by law must be upheld as concerns defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can negotiate with the other editor or the assessment team in making this decision.

Fair Treatment

Editors always rate a script based on their intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the authors.

Secrecy

The editors and staff editors must not disclose any information regarding the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the author, expert editors, bestari partners and publishers.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest

The materials disclosed in unpublished manuscript submitted should not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author clear.



Assessment Team Liability


Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Evaluation smart partners to assist editors in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also help writers improve writing.

Quickness

Each assessor chosen who are not qualified to judge the research reported in a manuscript or knows that rapid review will not have to notify the editor and rid itself of the assessment process .

Secrecy

Each manuscript is accepted to be rated should be treated as confidential documents. The document should not be shown or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.

Objectivity standards

Assessment should be conducted objectively. Critics are personal to the author is not justified. Assessors should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Recognition Source

Assessors should identify relevant published work that is not cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by relevant quotes. An appraiser should also ask the editor's attention to the similarity or overlap between the manuscript assessed and other writings have been published.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest

Confidential information or opinion obtained through assessment bestari partners must be kept secret and should not be used for private purposes. The assessor should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest that comes from relationships or connections that are competition, cooperation, or other with any author, company, or institution related to writing.



Author Liabilities

Reporting standards

The author should present an accurate account of the work created and discussion on significance. Basic data should be represented accurately in writing. An article should include sufficient detail and references to permit others to repeat the work. Statements fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Authenticity and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written works that are entirely original, and that they have quoted correctly when using the work and / or words of others.

Double Publishing , repetition or Coincided

An author is generally not publish the manuscript which essentially describes the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Recognition Source

Fair recognition of the work of others must always be given . The authors should cite the publication of influence in determining the nature of the work being reported.

Authorship Posts

Authorship should be limited to those who made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution or interpretation of the study reported. All the people who made significant contributions should be listed as (co-authors). If there are other people who participated in certain important aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as a contributor (contributors). The author is right to ensure that all appropriate co-authors put in writing, and that all authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed submission for publication.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other conflicts and other substantive conflict that might influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All financial support for the project must be notified.

Fundamental errors in published works

If an author finds errors or inaccuracies that means in the paper publication, the author is obligated to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper