Instructional Leadership of Madrasah Principals in Improving Teacher Quality in Elementary Madrasahs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18592/moe.v12i2.20203Keywords:
Instructional Leadership, Teacher Quality, and Professional DevelopmentAbstract
Improving teacher quality is a crucial factor in determining the quality of the learning process and educational outcomes in Islamic schools. This study seeks to examine the instructional leadership strategies employed by madrasah principals to enhance teacher quality at MI Dalwa Pasuruan, while also identifying the factors that facilitate or hinder their implementation. This research employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. The data collection methods used were observation, in-depth interview, and documentation with the madrasah principal and teachers as the respondents. Data analysis was conducted interactively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that teacher quality improvement is implemented through a learning management cycle that includes participatory quality improvement program planning, implementation of ongoing teacher training and coaching, supervision of learning by the madrasah principal, and reflective program evaluation conducted with the teachers' council. The program contributed to improving pedagogical competence and professional awareness among some teachers in developing learning practices. However, the program's effectiveness is still affected by several inhibiting factors, such as low motivation among some teachers to innovate in learning, limited information technology facilities, and discipline in participating in professional development activities. On the other hand, the supportive leadership style of madrasah principals and a collaborative culture among teachers are important supporting factors in maintaining sustainable improvements in educational quality. This research confirms that instructional leadership and the strength of school social capital play a strategic role in enhancing teacher professionalism in madrasahs with limited resources.
References
Abidin, Z., & Qusairi, A. (2025). Kepemimpinan Kolaboratif Dan Partisipatif Dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan (JMP), 14(3), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.26877/jmp.v14i3.24842
Affriyenni, Y., Georgiou, H., & Finkelstein, N. (2025). Navigating the adoption of research-based instructional strategies within the complex nature of higher education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(2), 020124. https://doi.org/10.1103/wvjk-8y8k
Anselmus Dami, Z., Budi Wiyono, B., Imron, A., Burhanuddin, B., Supriyanto, A., & Daliman, M. (2022). Principal self-efficacy for instructional leadership in the perspective of principal strengthening training: Work engagement, job satisfaction and motivation to leave. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2064407. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2064407
Bouncken, R. B., Czakon, W., & Schmitt, F. (2026). Purposeful sampling and saturation in qualitative research methodologies: Recommendations and review. Review of Managerial Science, 20(2), 579–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00881-2
Bush, T., Middlewood, D., & Bell, L. (2019). Principles of educational leadership & management.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dasci Sonmez, E., Cemaloglu, N., & Kahraman, G. (2025). Teachers’ professional learning: Do instructional leadership and teacher leadership make a difference in Turkiye? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(5), 1016–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241280124
Ediyanto, E., Çakır, G. K., Wong, L. H., Muslihati, M., Ben, F., & Setiyowati, A. J. (2025). Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Educational Management and Technology (ICEMT 2024). Springer Nature.
García-Martínez, I., Montenegro-Rueda ,Marta, Molina-Fernández ,Elvira, & and Fernández-Batanero, J. M. (2021). Mapping teacher collaboration for school success. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1925700
Gechere, T., Oumer, J., & Ouke, T. (2025). Influence of principals’ instructional leadership and teachers’ efficacy on students’ performance in secondary schools in the Wolaita Zone, South Ethiopia. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01797-3
Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2022). Mapping the intellectual lineage of educational management, administration and leadership, 1972–2020. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(2), 192–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211006093
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2023). The importance of school leadership? What we know. School Leadership & Management, 43(5), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2287806
He, P., Guo, F., & Abazie, G. A. (2024). School principals’ instructional leadership as a predictor of teacher’s professional development. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE.
Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The Effect of Instructional Leadership and Distributed Leadership on Teacher Self-efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Mediating Roles of Supportive School Culture and Teacher Collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
Mavi, D., Tuti, G., & Özdemir, M. (2025). Instructional leadership as a catalyst for teacher professionalism: A multilevel mediation model of teacher collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 63(6), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2025-0055
Meyer, A., Hartung-Beck, V., Gronostaj, A., Krüger, S., & Richter, D. (2023). How can principal leadership practices promote teacher collaboration and organizational change? A longitudinal multiple case study of three school improvement initiatives. Journal of Educational Change, 24(3), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09451-9
Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ
Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
Monaro, S., Gullick, J., & West, S. (2022). Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Research: A Step-by-Step Example of Phenomenological Interpretation. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5249
Muli Prima Aldi M, Tika Widiyan, Juni Erpida Nasution, Leni Fitrianti, & Farida Nur Hidayah. (2026). The Role of Madrasah Principal Leadership in Enhancing Institutional Quality in Islamic Senior High Schools. Journal of Educational Management Research, 5(1), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v5i1.1624
Nguyen, D., Pietsch, M., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Collective teacher innovativeness in 48 countries: Effects of teacher autonomy, collaborative culture, and professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103463
Nolan, K., & Xenofontos, C. (2025). Exploring Teachers’ Fears and Resistance when Learning about Culturally Responsive Pedagogy in the Mathematics Classroom. Journal for Theoretical & Marginal Mathematics Education, 4(1), Article 0406. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17024063
Opara, V., Spangsdorf, S., & Ryan, M. K. (2023). Reflecting on the use of Google Docs for online interviews: Innovation in qualitative data collection. Qualitative Research, 23(3), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211045192
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for Teacher Learning: A Community of Practice Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07312958
Qusairi, A. (2024). Strategi Pembinaan untuk Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru di Sekolah. Jurnal Inovatif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.38073/jimpi.v3i2.1698
Rahimi, R. A., & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: Navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00303-4
Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(8), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011
Shaked, H. (2023). How organizational management supports instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2022-0101
Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Trust, T., & and Whalen, J. (2021). Emergency remote teaching with technology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Using the whole teacher lens to examine educator’s experiences and insights. Educational Media International, 58(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2021.1930479
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
Zaini, M., Barnoto, B., & Ashari, A. (2023). Improving Teacher Performance and Education Quality through Madrasah Principal Leadership. Kharisma: Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v2i2.23
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zainal Abidin, Ahmad Qusairi, Ikmal Wahyudi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a 